1 / 26

Impact of a Hospital-Based Exercise Program on M usculoskeletal Health Outcomes in Older Adults

Impact of a Hospital-Based Exercise Program on M usculoskeletal Health Outcomes in Older Adults. Sandra Goldsmith, MA, MS, RD Director, Public & Patient Education Titilayo Ologhobo, MPH Public Heath Outcomes Manager, Public & Patient Education Osteoarthritis Action Alliance Lunch & Learn

Télécharger la présentation

Impact of a Hospital-Based Exercise Program on M usculoskeletal Health Outcomes in Older Adults

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Impact of a Hospital-Based Exercise Program on Musculoskeletal Health Outcomes in Older Adults Sandra Goldsmith, MA, MS, RD Director, Public & Patient Education Titilayo Ologhobo, MPH Public Heath Outcomes Manager, Public & Patient Education Osteoarthritis Action Alliance Lunch & Learn October 15, 2014

  2. Background • Osteoarthritis (OA) is the leading cause of disability in the US, with estimates showing that 27 million Americans have the disease at an estimated cost of $89.1 billion per year1 • One out of four people suffer from longstanding musculoskeletal conditions2 • OA affects more than 70% of adults between 55 - 78 years of age3 • Older adults with knee OA who engage in moderate physical activity at least 3 x/week can reduce the risk of arthritis-related disability by 47%4 Source: 1Leigh, J.P., Seavey, W., & Leistikow, B. (2001). Estimating the costs of job-related arthritis. Journal of Rheumatology, 28(7), 1647-1654. 2The Bone and Joint Decade. (2014). Global Alliance for Musculoskeletal Health. Retrieved on Jan 10, 2014 from http://bjdonline.org/?page_id=11 3Disability Guidelines (2012). Joint Disorders. Retrieved on August 8, 2014 from http://www.mdguidelines.com/joint-disorders 4Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). Healthy People 2020: Overview of physical activity. Retrieved on August 8, 2012 from http://www.cdc.gov/arthritis/press/questions.htm

  3. Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) • Orthopedic hospital known for its expertise in musculoskeletal and rheumatologic conditions • Committed to providing the highest quality patient care, improving mobility, and enhancing the quality of life of the community it serves • Longstanding history of providing community service and programs to populations of all socio-demographic backgrounds

  4. Osteoarthritis Wellness Initiative (OAWI) • Educate, raise awareness and reduce the impact of OA in the community • Educational seminars and workshops • Exercise classes (focus of today’s presentation) • Free or low-cost programs • Open to the public

  5. The OAWI Team • Laura Robbins, DSW – Senior Vice President • Sandra Goldsmith, MA, MS, RD –Director • Titilayo Ologhobo, MPH – Outcomes Manager • Robyn Wiesel, CHES – Manager • Huijuan Huang, MPA – Senior Program Coordinator • Linda Roberts, LCSW – Program Coordinator • Madeline Meislin – Assistant Coordinator

  6. OAWI Exercise Classes • Goal: improve musculoskeletal health among exercise class participants by: • decreasing musculoskeletal pain, stiffness, fatigue, falls and health limitations • improving health status, level of physical activity and self-efficacy for exercise • improving balance ratings and reducing losses in balance

  7. Program Description • Exercise classes 1x/week • Pilates, Tai Chi, Yoga, Dance, Yogalates • Led by certified exercise instructors • Participants • English-speaking older adults

  8. Methodology • Pre/post surveys • changes in health outcomes • program satisfaction • Approved by the HSS IRB

  9. Outcomes Measures • Standardized and validated instruments • Self-reported • Pain • Pain Relief (Yes/No) • Pain intensity measured by the Numeric Pain Intensity Scale • Pain interference on seven aspects of daily living from the Brief Pain Inventory • Stiffness • Single-item stiffness rating scale from the Brief Stiffness Inventory

  10. Outcomes Measures • Fatigue • Single-item fatigue rating scale from the Brief Fatigue Inventory • Balance • 5-point rating scale • Physical Activity (PA) • Three-question Physical Activity Assessment

  11. Data Analysis • Three levels of analysis • Total sample • Exercise type • Sample with arthritis conditions (OA & RA) • Matched pairs • Paired sample t-test • Chi-square test • Demographic data

  12. Results • Time frame • Spring 2011 – Spring 2014 • Program Reach • 803 total participants • 204 respondents collected via matched pre/post-surveys • Demographic Data • Female (91%) and Caucasian (86%) • Participants were generally older • 65-74 yrs. (25%) • 75-84 yrs. (36%) • >85 yrs. (31%)

  13. Results: Total Sample (n = 204) • Pain Relief • Pain significantly decreased from pre to post test (56% to 47%, p≤0.001) • Pain Intensity • Statistically significant reductions (p≤0.001) in mean pain intensity (pre-test = 4.6; post-test = 3.9)

  14. Results: Total Sample (n = 204) *denotes statistical significance at p≤0.05 **denotes statistical significance at p≤0.01 ***denotes statistical significance at p≤0.001

  15. Results: Total Sample (n = 204) Mean Stiffness and Fatigue Levels on an 11-point rating scale Pre Vs. Post ***denotes statistical significance at p≤0.001 *denotes statistical significance at p≤0.05

  16. Results: Total Sample (n = 204) ***denotes statistical significance at p≤0.001 ***denotes statistical significance at p≤0.001

  17. Results: Exercise Type Pain Interference on Aspects of Daily Living on an 11-point rating scale Pre vs. Post Pilates (n = 33) Yogalates (n = 41) *denotes statistical significance at p≤0.05 **denotes statistical significance at p≤0.01

  18. Results: Exercise Type Balance Ratings (%) Pain Relief (%) *denotes statistical significance at p≤0.05 **denotes statistical significance at p≤0.01 ***denotes statistical significance at p≤0.001

  19. Results: Exercise Type **denotes statistical significance at p≤0.01

  20. Results: Sample with Arthritis Conditions (n = 20) • OA and/or RA* • Pain Intensity • mean pain intensity dropped from 3.6 to 2.9 • Pain Interference • mean pain interference reduced on all aspects of their quality of life • Fatigue • mean fatigue level dropped from 3.8 to 2.5(p ≤ 0.001) • Physical Activity • ≥ 20 minutes of vigorous – intensity PA increased from 13% to 25% (p ≤ 0.05) *Small sample size because collection of data on musculoskeletal conditions commenced in 2013.

  21. Program Satisfaction 98% would recommend the program to a friend or family member

  22. Qualitative Reviews • “This is a wonderful class, taught by a wonderful teacher” • “Superb! An amazing teacher...even her voice is calming” • “The exercise classes are terrific” • “I recommended this program to many of my friends” • “I recommend that HSS could offer the class twice a week” • “I have acquired many valuable exercises from this terrific program which I now incorporate into my daily routine” • “Excellent class, excellent instructor! We all love it!”

  23. Limitations • Small sample size • Survey fatigue • Self-reported data • Participation in exercise programs outside of study

  24. Summary • HSS exercise programs are effective in improving musculoskeletal health outcomes and are associated with positive changes in pain, balance, fatigue, fitness and certain aspects of QOL • It is important to identify effective programs that raise awareness and reduce the impact of musculoskeletal conditions

  25. Next Steps • Implement necessary changes to program outcome measures and evaluation methodology based on results • Broaden the variety of classes offered and implement other models to increase program reach • Explore next phase of program evaluation

  26. Thank You!

More Related