1 / 13

HARMONISATION of Criteria for HACCP food safety SYSTEMS

HARMONISATION of Criteria for HACCP food safety SYSTEMS. PETER GOOSEN DUTCH NATIONAL BOARD of EXPERTS-HACCP. INTRODUCTION. Government inspection systems Consumer interests HACCP food safety system standards One GLOBAL registration/certification system Harmonisation initiatives needed.

austin
Télécharger la présentation

HARMONISATION of Criteria for HACCP food safety SYSTEMS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. HARMONISATION of Criteria for HACCP food safety SYSTEMS PETER GOOSEN DUTCH NATIONAL BOARD of EXPERTS-HACCP

  2. INTRODUCTION • Government inspection systems • Consumer interests • HACCP food safety system standards • One GLOBAL registration/certification system • Harmonisation initiatives needed

  3. SAFETY of FOOD Products • Highly regulated area • Risk assessment based approach • No transparent process • Consumers lost confidence • Uncontrolled market responses • International dimension of food market

  4. RESOLUTION • MARKET driven monitoring system • SHARED responsibility all parties • accepted by Governments as complementary system • VOLUNTARY 3rd party REGISTRATION SYSTEM • Consumer ‘SELF PROTECTION’

  5. International Accreditation Forum  LEVEL III (GOLBAL ACCEPTANCE) Accreditation Body  LEVEL II (AUTHORIZATION) Registration Body LEVEL 1 (ASSESSMENT) Feed/Food Supplier ISO Guide 61Peer review system ISO Guide 62/66/65 Registration System Food safety Standard 3 levelled Structure

  6. SUITABLE STANDARD for CERTIFICATION • Food safety SYSTEM with basic requirements • HACCP/HAZOP CONCEPT of major importance • ALINORM 93/13A, Annex II best available • No objective, measurable criteria in CODEX • VERBATIM standards: not of use • ISO 9000 linked standards • HACCP-9000 by Nat. Sanitation Foundation • SQF2000, Australia • ISO 15161 (to be published)

  7. Dutch HAZOP Registration System • Full Food chain, incl. feed and primary sector • Focus on Food SAFETY • No requirement to implement ISO 9000 • Accessible to SME’s/Developm.Countries • Danish standard DS 3021 • Criteria for compentence, assessment methodology, report, decision and surveillance

  8. Harmonized system • First-sight: no need for harmonisation • System undermined at all three levels • Level I: ISO 9000/GMP/Retailers • Level 2: Inspection versus Registration • inspection system lacks safeguards on impartiality, participation all parties, unbiased review • variation in level of confidence unknown • Level 3: IAF no initiatives taken

  9. ISO 9000 approach • ‘translated’ ISO 9000 standards and ISO 15161 no/little added value • ISO 9000 registration body lack specific expertise • ‘Watering down’ requirements/scrutinity • Danish/Dutch proposal to ISO TC 34 for ‘stand alone’ HAZOP food safety standard

  10. GMP requirements • Incorporation GMP/Hygiene Code and Pre Requisite Requirements • to be considered prior to application HAZOP • company own inspection system • change from system to process approach • no international structure for harmonisation/reduction variation

  11. Retailers initiatives • BRC Technical SpecificationCIES Global Food Safety Initiative • no consensus standard, retailers dominate • inspection reports condition for purchase • one day inspection on 250 points • HAZOP/food safety much lower level • reduces motivation to implement HAZOP • judgement of one inspector

  12. CONSUMERS/Producers • Should force third party registration system • Should participate in development of HAZOP standard and assessment criteria • Should force recognition system by Government • Should require proper accreditation

  13. CONTACT • For Registration System documents • FREE of costs • Peter Goosen • intass@wxs.nl • THANK YOU

More Related