1 / 13

CARPE DIEM

CARPE DIEM. 5th meeting. Dublin, December 2003. Bernat Codina, Miquel Picanyol Dept. of Astronomy and Meteorology University of Barcelona. WP 3: Data assimilation. Contribution to WP3 (Data Assimilation): Experiment comparison between the IAU and nudging methods.

avani
Télécharger la présentation

CARPE DIEM

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CARPE DIEM 5th meeting. Dublin, December 2003. Bernat Codina, Miquel Picanyol Dept. of Astronomy and Meteorology University of Barcelona

  2. WP 3: Data assimilation • Contribution to WP3 (Data Assimilation): • Experiment comparison between the IAU and nudging methods. • Assess the impact on the precipitation field.

  3. WP 3: Data assimilation • Description of the experiment: • Corrections on the T,u,v,q and ps variables are introduced via IAU and nudging methods. • Assimilation frequency: 6 and 3 hours. • 10 different cases.

  4. WP 3: Data assimilation Methodology: “Perfect OBS” First guess + Observations First guess IAU/Nudging First guess Control

  5. WP 3: Data assimilation Surface temperature

  6. WP 3: Data assimilation U 850hPa

  7. WP 3: Data assimilation Sfc – 500hPa RH

  8. ME = 4.1 ME = 4.2 ME = 1.2 RMSE = 14.1 RMSE = 17.7 RMSE = 17.9 ME = -0.8 RMSE = 14.9 ME = -0.7 RMSE = 12.6 WP 3: Data assimilation Total precipitation

  9. ME = 0.8 ME = 1.1 ME = -0.2 RMSE = 9.3 RMSE = 6.9 RMSE = 16.8 ME = -0.04 RMSE = 12.4 ME = 0.2 RMSE = 7.1 WP 3: Data assimilation Total precipitation

  10. ME = 6.0 ME = 6.6 ME = -0.2 RMSE = 23.4 RMSE = 19.4 RMSE = 23.8 ME = 0.2 RMSE = 22.9 ME = 0.5 RMSE = 19.0 WP 3: Data assimilation Total precipitation

  11. WP 3: Data assimilation Total precipitation mean error

  12. WP 3: Data assimilation Total precipitation RMSE

  13. WP 3: Data assimilation • Conclusions: • Best results in 3-hour frequency assimilation. • IAU tends to overestimate precipitation. • 3-hour nudging assimilation minimizes the total precipitation RMSE. • Verification of precipitation: • RMSE severely penalizes mislocation errors. • Other verification methods could be applied. [Ebert & McBride, 2000]

More Related