1 / 35

Workshop: SSHRC Insight Development Grant

Workshop: SSHRC Insight Development Grant. November 29, 2011, Waterloo December 6, 2011, Brantford Elin Edwards & Barry Ries. LAURIER OFFICE OF RESEARCH SERVICES. Basic Information. No notification of intent SSHRC due date: February 1, 2012

avery
Télécharger la présentation

Workshop: SSHRC Insight Development Grant

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Workshop: SSHRC Insight Development Grant November 29, 2011, Waterloo December 6, 2011, Brantford Elin Edwards & Barry Ries LAURIER OFFICE OF RESEARCH SERVICES

  2. Basic Information • No notification of intent • SSHRC due date: February 1, 2012 • Laurier internal due date: January 25, 2012 • SSHRC CV and application verified & submitted online • “External Grant & Contract Cover Sheet” with dean & chair signatures to the Office of Research Services • Results announced: June 2012

  3. Grant Assistance

  4. Grant Assistance • Budget • Paul Barnard, Research Grants Officer • pbarnard@wlu.ca • X3131 • Editorial • Elin Edwards, Editorial/Communications Officer • eedwards@wlu.ca • X3533 • Barry Ries, Editorial/Communications Officer • bries@wlu.ca • x3479

  5. Statistics for the first Insight Development Grant Competition • 630 eligible applications • 194 awards • Commitments of $10,474,793 over two years

  6. Insight Development Grants:Key Features • Applicant: Principal investigator • Duration: 1 to 2 years • Value: Up to $75,000 • Application process: One-stage application • Next deadline: February 1, 2012

  7. Insight Development Grants:Purpose • To support research in its initial stages • To enable the development of • new research questions • experimentation with new methods, theoretical approaches, and/or ideas • Funding is provided for short-term research development projects, of up to two years, proposed by individuals or teams. • May include • case studies • pilot initiatives • critical analyses of existing research.

  8. Insight Grant vs. Insight Development Grant Insight Insight Development • $7,000 to $75,000 • 1-2 years 50% of funding for new scholars Scoring: - Challenge – 50% - Feasibility – 20% - Capability – 30% • $7,000 to $500,000 • 3-5 years • No special funds for new scholars • Scoring: - Challenge – 40% - Feasibility – 20% - Capability – 40%

  9. Insight Development Grants:Application Categories • Within the Insight Development Grants funding opportunity, funding is available for two distinct categories of scholars: new scholars & regular scholars • New scholars*: • This funding supports high-quality research projects by new scholars to develop new research questions and/or approaches. • Such projects may build on and further the applicant’s (or team’s) graduate work and/or represent a continuation of their overall research trajectory • Regular scholars: • Funding for regular scholars provides support to explore new research questions and/or approaches that are distinct from the applicant’s previous or ongoing research. • Research projects should be clearly delimited and in the early stages of the research process. • Insight Development Grant funding is not intended to support ongoing research for regular scholars.

  10. *New scholar • Someone who has not yet had the opportunity to establish an extensive record of research achievement, but is in the process of building one. • Applicants identifying themselves as a new scholar must demonstrate that they have not applied successfully, as principal investigator or project director, for a grant through any of SSHRC’s funding opportunities. • In addition, they must meet at least one of the following criteria: • have completed their highest degree no more than five years before the competition deadline (SSHRC considers only the date of completion of the first doctorate);
or • have held a tenured or tenure-track university appointment for less than five years;
or • have held a university appointment, but never a tenure-track position (in the case of institutions that offer tenure-track positions);
or • have had their careers significantly interrupted or delayed for family reasons.

  11. Insight Development Grants: EligibilityRequirements • New and regular scholars are welcome to apply. • Applied for Insight Grant, October 2011: • OK to apply for IDG in February 2012 • (but with different objectives) • Apply for IDG in February 2012: • cannot apply for Insight Grant in October 2012 • If you currently hold a SSHRC Insight or Standard Research grant: • OK to apply for an Insight Development Grant • (but not as a new scholar). • If you’re not sure • Consult SSHRC’s Frequently Asked Questions and/or call a program officer (see next-to-last slide).

  12. Insight Development Grants: EvaluationProcess • Adjudication: • Applicants may select one of 5 Research Groups or request a multidisciplinary adjudication • Research Groups are then divided into adjudication committees based on their demand • Feedback: • All applicants will receive, together with SSHRC’s notice of decision, a summary of the adjudication committee's comments

  13. Insight Development Grants: Adjudication

  14. Insight Development Grants:Committees + Applicant Choices • Applicants will be asked to select: • which of the five groups is most appropriate for their proposal • A primary discipline and area of research from the list on the application form • Applicants submitting multidisciplinary or interdisciplinary proposals must: • indicate secondary & tertiary disciplines and areas of research • include a rationale for the request

  15. Insight Development Grants:Research Groups at Application Stage • Group 1: • History; medieval studies; classics; literature; fine arts; philosophy; religious studies; and related fields. • Group 2: • Anthropology; archaeology; linguistics; translation; political science; public administration; law; criminology; geography; urban planning and environmental studies; and related fields. • Group 3: • Business and management; economics; and related fields. • Group 4: • Sociology; demography; communication studies; journalism; media studies; gender studies; cultural studies; library and information science; and related fields. • Group 5: • Education; psychology; social work; career guidance; and related fields.

  16. Committee Members • Number of committee members is a function of applications received. SSHRC aims for an equitable and a reasonable distribution of work • Specific members chosen for broad-ranging expertise/experience and scholarly stature • SSHRCalso seeks balance in terms of: • university size (small, medium and large) • geographical region • Language • gender • 2011 IDG Competition: • Applicants applied to one of the five broad research areas • 9 committees subsequently created based on: • disciplines implicated in the proposals • applicants’ request for disciplinary or multidisciplinary review

  17. Insight Development Grants: OptionalPriority Areas • Applicants are asked to indicate whether their research falls within one of SSHRC’s priority areas: • Aboriginal Research • Canadian Environmental Issues • Digital Economics • Innovation, Leadership, and Prosperity • Northern Communities: Towards Social and Economic Prosperity • Read priority area descriptions carefully • Must complete a 1-page “Statement of Alignment”

  18. Insight Development Grants: EvaluationProcess & Criteria • The scoring scheme is the same as for the Partnership Development grant. • Challenge: • Aim and importance of endeavour (50%) • Feasibility: • The plan to achieve excellence (20%) • Capability: • The expertise to succeed (30%) • Make sure all of these are accounted for in your proposal somewhere – clearly!

  19. Evaluation Criterion #1: Challenge – the aim and importance of the endeavour (50%) • originality, significance and expected contribution to knowledge; • appropriateness of the literature review; • appropriateness of the theoretical approach or framework; • appropriateness of the methods/approach; • quality of training and mentoring to be provided to students, emerging scholars and other highly qualified personnel, and opportunities for them to contribute; and • potential influence and impact within and/or beyond the social sciences and humanities research community.

  20. Evaluation Criterion #2: Feasibility –the plan to achieve excellence (20%) • probability of effective and timely attainment of the research objectives; • appropriateness of the requested budget, and justification of proposed costs; • indications of financial and in-kind contributions from other sources, where appropriate; • quality of knowledge mobilization plans, including for effective knowledge dissemination, knowledge exchange and engagement within and/or beyond the research community; and • strategies and timelines for the design and conduct of the activity/activities proposed.

  21. Evaluation Criterion #3: Capability –the expertise to succeed (30%) • quality, quantity and significance of past experience and published outputs of the applicant and any team members relative to their roles in the project and their respective stages of career; • evidence of contributions such as commissioned reports, professional practice, public discourse, public policies, products and services, development of talent, experience in collaboration, etc.; and • potential to make future contributions.

  22. Insight Development Grants:Scoring Table

  23. Insight Development Grant:Application Components • Summary of Proposed Research: 1 page • Clear, plain language, aimed at non-specialist • Include: • The problem or issue to be addressed • The potential contribution of the research, both to the advancement of knowledge and the wider public benefit • One of the most important sections of your application!

  24. Insight Development Grant:Application Components (not 6…) • Detailed Description: 5 pages • “Use the following headings to describe the proposed research in enough detail to allow informed assessment by committee members” • Objectives • Context • Lit review • Relationship to your ongoing research • Importance/originality/contribution to knowledge • Theoretical approach or framework • Methodology • Research strategies & key activities • Justify choice • Explain specific instruments/procedures A timeline works well here!

  25. Insight Development Grant:Application Components • Knowledge Mobilization Plan • 2000 characters (about 1 page) • Knowledge Mobilization: • “the specific activities and tools that facilitate the multidirectional flow and exchange of research knowledge.” • “facilitating and enabling the benefit and impact of research on and beyond the campus (as described under Intended Outcomes of Proposed Activities) through enhanced accessibility and interaction.” • May include: publications, events, development of pedagogy, other forms of knowledge mobilization • Include: • Overall plan for “flow & exchange” and engaging various audiences • Schedule for achieving KM activities • Elaboration on purpose of KM activities and goals New for Insight grants Timeline helps…

  26. Insight Development Grant:Application Components • List of references: maximum 10 pages • Research Team and Student Training: 2 pages • A. Description of research team (if applicable) • Only if including co-applicants and collaborators • B. Description of student training strategies • Specific roles, responsibilities, duties of students & RAs • How these will complement their academic training • Budget Justification: 2 pages • Use categories from “Funds Requested from SSHRC” • Explain needs and amounts in detail • Relate to objectives of research • Appropriateness of budget & justification of costs: subcriterion in Feasibility section!

  27. Insight Development Grant:Application Components • Research Contributions: 4 pages • 1. research contributions over the last 6 years • 2. other contributions • 3. most significant career research contributions • 4. career interruptions and special circumstances • 5. contributions to training • Use SSHRC formatting instructions • Principal applicant: upload as part of application • Collaborators: information on uploading attachment in their “invitation” email

  28. Insight Development Grant:Application Components • Intended Outcomes of Proposed Activities • Dropdowns: • Scholarly benefits • Social benefits • Audiences • Expected outcomes summary - about 1 page • Potential benefits/outcomes that could emerge from proposed research and related activities • Evolution, effects, potential learning, implications • Knowledge mobilization = dissemination activities • Outcomes = effects of research

  29. Insight Development Grant:Application Components • Optional statements: • Sport Participation Research Initiative (Statement of Relevance) – 1 page • How research meets the intiative’s sport participation objectives • How research is relevant to the initiative’s focus on enhancing sport participation and the development of policy and programs intended to enhance participation • Statement of Alignment (with priority areas) – 1 page • How your research is relevant to the priority area(s) • How your research will advance knowledge with respect to the priority area(s)

  30. Characteristics of a Successful Application • Complete all mandatory fields (boldfaced labels). • Attach all mandatory electronic uploads (application). • For pdf uploads, use required format • Pdf format (.pdf extension), unprotected • Maximum file size of 500 Kb • 8.5 x 11 • Maximum page length specified for section • Body text: minimum of 12 point Times New Roman • Single-spaced (no more than 6 lines per inch) • All margins set at ¾” Note: Word defaults to more than this, so reset your margins to .75” all around

  31. Characteristics of a Successful Application • Ensure all co-applicants and collaborators (i.e., participants with SSHRC CVs) have submitted their "Accept Invitation Form” and uploaded their CVs • Verify and correct data until the Verification Report indicates successful verification. • Click on the "Submit" button (Submit to Research Administrator) for institutional approval.

  32. Characteristics of a Successful Application • Clarity: application is • well written, • well organized and • error-free • Originality: application is • challenging, • interesting, and • ambitious yet feasible • Project’s significance is clear • Potential impact is stated convincingly • Presented confidently, not boastfully Always answer the question So What?

  33. Resources: www.wlu.ca/research How to find us! Information on SSHRC programs & links to website Cover sheet (fillable pdf) Finance information for budget

  34. For more information… Laurier “External Grant and Contract Cover Sheet” Laurier “Request for External Peer Review” Laurier “2011-2012 Grant Assistance Timetable and Contacts” Laurier Research Finance webpage: www.wlu.ca/researchfinance SSHRC Insight Development Grant description SSHRC Insight Development Grant instructions SSHRC Insight Grant & Insight Development Grant FAQs SSHRC Priority Areas and Priority Areas FAQ SSHRC Program Officers by discipline SSHRC Insight Development Grants general program information: Email: insightdevelopment@sshrc-crsh.gc.caTel.: 613-947-9659

  35. Thankyou / Merci • Laurier Office of Research Services • www.wlu.ca/research • Laurier Research Finance information • www.wlu.ca/research/researchfinance • External Grant information • www.wlu.ca/research/externalgrants • Office of Research Services • Alumni Hall, top floor • Extension 3689 • research@wlu.ca

More Related