1 / 31

Grace GRAVITY FIELD SOLUTIONS USING THE DIFFERENTIAL GRAVIMETRY APPROACH

M. Weigelt, W. Keller. Grace GRAVITY FIELD SOLUTIONS USING THE DIFFERENTIAL GRAVIMETRY APPROACH. Continental Hydrology. Geodesy. Oceano - graphy. Solid Earth. Glacio - logy. Earth core. Tides. Atmosphere. Geophysical implications of the gravity field. Geoid.

aviva
Télécharger la présentation

Grace GRAVITY FIELD SOLUTIONS USING THE DIFFERENTIAL GRAVIMETRY APPROACH

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. M. Weigelt, W. Keller Grace GRAVITY FIELD SOLUTIONS USING THE DIFFERENTIAL GRAVIMETRY APPROACH

  2. Continental Hydrology Geodesy Oceano- graphy Solid Earth Glacio- logy Earth core Tides Atmosphere Geophysicalimplicationsofthegravityfield Geoid

  3. Geophysical implications of the gravity field ESA

  4. Observation system GRACE = Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment • Initial orbit height: ~ 485 km • Inclination: ~ 89° • Key technologies: • GPS receiver • Accelerometer • K-Band Ranging System • Observed quantity: • range • range rate CSR, UTexas

  5. Gravity field modelling with gravitational constant times mass of the Earth radius of the Earth spherical coordinates of the calculation point Legendre function degree, order (unknown) spherical harmonic coefficients

  6. Spectral representations Degree RMS Spherical harmonic spectrum

  7. Outline • GRACE geometry • Solution strategies • Variational equations • Differential gravimetry approach • What about the Next-Generation-GRACE?

  8. Geometry of the GRACE system

  9. Geometry of the GRACE system B A Differentiation Rummel et al. 1978 Integration

  10. Solution Strategies

  11. Solution strategies Variational equations In-situ observations Energy Integral (Han 2003, Ramillien et al. 2010) Classical (Reigber 1989, Tapley 2004) Celestial mechanics approach • (Beutler et al. 2010, Jäggi 2007) Differential gravimetry (Liu 2010) LoS Gradiometry (Keller and Sharifi 2005) Short-arc method (Mayer-Gürr 2006) … … Numericalintegration Analyticalintegration

  12. Equation of motion Basic equation: Newton’s equation of motion where are all gravitational and non-gravitational disturbing forces In the general case: ordinary second order non-linear differential equation Double integration yields:

  13. Linearization For the solution, linearization using a Taylor expansion is necessary: • Types of partial derivatives: • initial position • initial velocity • residual gravity field coefficients • additional parameter Homogeneous solution Inhomogeneous solution …

  14. Homogeneous solution Homogeneous solution needs the partial derivatives: Derivation byintegrationofthevariationalequation Double integration !

  15. Inhomogeneous solution (one variant) Solution of the inhomogeneous part by the method of the variation of the constant (Beutler 2006): with being the columns of the matrix of the variational equation of the homogeneous solution at each epoch. Estimation of by solving the equation system at each epoch:

  16. Application to GRACE In case of GRACE, the observables are range and range rate: Chain rule needs to be applied:

  17. Limitations • additional parameters • compensate errors in the initial conditions • counteract accumulation of errors • outlier detection difficult • limited application to local areas • high computational effort • difficult estimation of corrections to the initial conditions in case of GRACE (twice the number of unknowns, relative observation)

  18. In-situ observations: Differential gravimetry approach

  19. Instantaneous relative reference frame Position Velocity

  20. In-situ observation Range observables: Multiplication with unit vectors: GRACE

  21. Relative motion between two epochs absolute motion neglected! GPS Epoch 1 K-Band Epoch 2

  22. Limitation Combination of highly precise K-Band observations with comparably low accurate GPS relative velocity

  23. Residual quantities estimated orbit GPS-observations true orbit Orbit fitting using the homogeneous solution of the variational equation with a known a priori gravity field Avoiding the estimation of empirical parameters by using short arcs

  24. Residual quantities ratio≈ 1:2 ratio≈ 25:1

  25. Approximated solution

  26. Next generation GRACE

  27. Next generation GRACE M. Dehne, Quest New type of intersatellite distance measurement based on laser interferometry Noise reduction by a factor 10 expected

  28. Solution for next generation GRACE

  29. Variational equations for velocity term Reduction to residual quantity insufficient Modeling the velocity term by variational equations: Application of the method of the variations of the constants

  30. Results • Only minor improvements by incorporating the estimation of corrections to the spherical harmonic coefficients due to the velocity term • Limiting factor is the orbit fit to the GPS positions • additional estimation of corrections to the initial conditions necessary

  31. Summary The primary observables of the GRACE system (range & range rate) are connected to gravity field quantities through variational equations (numerical integration) or through in-situ observations (analytical integration). Variational equations pose a high computational effort. In-situ observations demand the combination of K-band and GPS information. Next generation GRACE instruments pose a challenge to existing solution strategies.

More Related