1 / 30

Fostering Ad-Hoc Collaboration Between Marketing and R&D Departments

Fostering Ad-Hoc Collaboration Between Marketing and R&D Departments. (Concurrency Corporation). Contents. Executive Summary Current State Analysis Future State Analysis Business Case Adoption & Implementation Planning Next Steps. 2. Background.

ayita
Télécharger la présentation

Fostering Ad-Hoc Collaboration Between Marketing and R&D Departments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Fostering Ad-Hoc Collaboration Between Marketing and R&D Departments (Concurrency Corporation)

  2. Contents • Executive Summary • Current State Analysis • Future State Analysis • Business Case • Adoption & Implementation Planning • Next Steps 2

  3. Background • A consumer product development company, faces a number of challenges related to interdepartmental collaboration between the Marketing and R&D departments, including: • Inefficient communication and collaboration between departments • Long cycle times to address critical issues along the product development lifecycle • Lack of cross-visibility between the departments, leading to divergent directions in product development that must be laboriously reconciled later • Labor intensive preparation for weekly sync meetings between R&D and Marketing stakeholders to address trivial problems • Critical issues are often not identified until late in the product development process • The net result of these challenges is increased time to market, increased product development cost, and lower product profitability 3

  4. Background • Due to lack of frequent collaboration between marketing and R&D teams, teams working on the same project often diverge and require time consuming and costly realignment during the product development process: Marketing Path Converge Converge R&D Path Product Launch Project Kickoff Mid-course Realignment Meeting

  5. Engagement Participants 5

  6. Executive Summary • Concurrency proposes expanding upon your current Office System deployment to incorporate Ad-Hoc Collaboration capabilities • Implementing the proposed Ad-Hoc Collaboration solution will provide you with: • Real-time collaboration between product development stakeholders within the departments • 25% decrease in time to market, from 8 months to 6 months • 25% increase in sales due to better, more feature rich products • 30% reduction in product development labor time and cost • Anticipated annual benefit to (Contoso) of $250,000 6

  7. Executive Summary • By promoting constant Ad-Hoc Collaboration between the Marketing and R&D teams, you can ensure proper alignment between the efforts of the two teams • The teams function more as one unit, rather than two separate units • More marketing and engineering data is available earlier in the design process, which ensures better, more marketable products • Ultimately, this alignment reduces the time, effort, and cost to get products to market, and increases product revenues: Marketing Path R&D Path Project Kickoff Product Launch Ad-Hoc Collaboration

  8. Executive Summary 8

  9. Executive Summary 9

  10. Contents • Executive Summary • Current State Analysis • Future State Analysis • Business Case • Adoption & Implementation Planning • Next Steps 10

  11. Current State Process Analysis Product Development Process – Analysis Summary 11

  12. Current State Process Diagram 12

  13. Current State Process Diagram 13

  14. Current State Process Diagram 14

  15. Contents • Executive Summary • Current State Analysis • Future State Analysis • Business Case • Adoption & Implementation Planning • Next Steps 15

  16. Future State Process Analysis Product Development Process – Analysis Summary – Analysis Summary 16

  17. Prioritized Process Solutions High 5 • Deploy SharePoint Server 2010 • (SharePoint Server 2010 ) • Deploy Office CommunicationServer 2007 R2 • (Office Communication Server 2007 R2 ) Level Of Complexity 3 • Enable advanced SharePoint Features: • Blogs, Wikis, Expertise Search, Presence • (Office Communication Server 2007 R2, • SharePoint Server 2010 ) Low 1 5 1 3 High Low Value to Business 17

  18. Future State Process Diagram

  19. Future State Process Diagram

  20. Contents • Executive Summary • Current State Analysis • Future State Analysis • Business Case • Adoption & Implementation Planning • Next Steps 20

  21. Anticipated Benefits - Process 21

  22. Anticipated Benefits - Financial 22

  23. Anticipated Costs 23

  24. Contents • Executive Summary • Current State Analysis • Future State Analysis • Business Case • Adoption & Implementation Planning • Next Steps 24

  25. Adoption & Implementation Planning Summary 25

  26. Project Plan 26

  27. Potential Adoption Roadblocks 27

  28. Adoption Roadblock Mitigation Actions by Stakeholder 28

  29. Contents • Executive Summary • Current State Analysis • Future State Analysis • Business Case • Adoption & Implementation Planning • Next Steps 29

  30. Next Steps • Review presentation and proposal with decision maker(s) and stakeholders for approval • Consider a SharePoint Deployment Planning Services (SDPS) follow-up engagement • Execute work order for project • Schedule kick off meeting for week of _____ and weekly status meetings • Propose schedule: • A) Deadlines for initial milestones, or • B) Date to finalize initial milestones 30

More Related