1 / 55

Joint JAA/EUROCONTROL Task-Force on UAVs

Joint JAA/EUROCONTROL Task-Force on UAVs. Presentation at RST 03/4 Yves Morier JAA Regulation Director. OUTLINE OF THE PRESENTATION. What are JAA and EASA What is EUROCONTROL? Why a joint Task-force? Assumptions The Terms of Reference of the Task-Force. Task-Force discussions items

azana
Télécharger la présentation

Joint JAA/EUROCONTROL Task-Force on UAVs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Joint JAA/EUROCONTROL Task-Force on UAVs Presentation at RST 03/4 Yves Morier JAA Regulation Director

  2. OUTLINE OF THE PRESENTATION • What are JAA and EASA • What is EUROCONTROL? • Why a joint Task-force? • Assumptions • The Terms of Reference of the Task-Force. • Task-Force discussions items • Organisation of the Task-Force • The first draft of the report and some selected issues • State of play/Next steps. • Conclusion

  3. What are the JAA and EASA? • The JAA are a co-operative body forAviation Safety of 37 Member Authorities • Scope: • Design & manufacture; Operations and Maintenance of Aircraft. • Licensing of Flight Crew Personnel. • The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) operational on 28.09.03 is a EU Agency for 15 Member States • Scope: • Design & manufacture and Maintenance of Aircraft.

  4. What is EUROCONTROL ? • The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation: 31 Member States have signed the revised Convention . • Scope: ATM “gate to gate” • Future perspective: The 4 draft “SingleSky Regulations”.

  5. Co-operation JAA/EUROCONTROL • Agreement for Co-operation (1996): • Provide a working basis to work together on CNS/ATM issues • Ensure that aircraft airworthiness and operational requirements are co-ordinated with airspace and ATM developments

  6. Why a joint Task-Force ? • A joint Task-force is justified by the close relation between ATM issues and Aircraft issues in the case of UAVs. • The need for regulatory work was identified both within JAA and EUROCONTROL

  7. Assumptions • Should allow for take-off and landing at “normal” airports and use of “normal” airspace. • Should accommodate UAVs of various size & with different levels of technology • Should accommodate various kinds of operations

  8. Terms of Reference (1) • Develop a concept for UAV regulations: • Design & Manufacture and Maintenance of UAVs. • Operations of UAVs (in particular approval of operators) • Licensing of UAVs personnel. • Rules of the Air • Security issues • Concept ? • Outline and guiding principles for regulations • Not draft regulations !

  9. Terms of Reference (2) • Objective of regulating UAVs: • To protect third parties, airborne and on the ground • Not address mission failure.

  10. Terms of reference (6) • Deliverables: • A concept with its justification and recommendations for future work • Time scales: • Report originally planned for September 2003 however extension until February 2004 agreed. • More details on the Terms of Reference can be found in Attachment 1 to this presentation.

  11. Categorisation of the Task-Force discussion items (1) • General • ICAO • Airworthiness and continued airworthiness • Environment

  12. Categorisation of the Task-Force discussion items (2) • Operation; Maintenance and Licensing. • Air Traffic Management • Security • More details on these discussion items can be found in Attachment 2 to this presentation.

  13. Organisation of the UAV Task-Force • Sub-group I: General, Safety and Security • Sub-group II: Airworthiness & Continued Airworthiness and Environment • Sub-group III: Operations, Maintenance and Licensing • ATM and ICAO to be handled within the EUROCONTROL system. A two-way dialogue exists with the UAV Task-Force

  14. The first draft of the report and some selected issues • The Draft report consists of: • An executive summary: TBD • 7 Chapters • 15 annexes or Appendices (today) • A detailed outline can be found in Attachment 3 to this presentation

  15. The first draft of the report and some selected issues • Definitions of: • UAV and UAV system • UAV Operator and UAV Commander • Safety Case and detailed codes: • Safety Case only? • Detailed codes only? • Safety Cases and detailed codes?

  16. The first draft of the report and some selected issues • Two techniques to establish applicable design standard: • Kinetic energy of the Air Vehicle • Safety objectives: Ground victim criterion; kinetic energy; lethal surface; population density • Emergency Procedures and Flight Termination Systems:

  17. State of Play/Next Steps • First draft has been circulated to the Task-Force, and for “advance reactions” to Central JAA and within EUROCONTROL. • Comments will be reviewed by the Task-Force “leadership” on November 20-21 resulting in a second draft. • Second draft reviewed by the Plenary Task Force on December 10-11 resulting in a third draft

  18. State of Play/Next Steps • Third draft “formally” consulted between 19.12.03 and 30.01.04: JAA Sectorial Teams; EUROCONTROL; Others? • Review of Comments by the Task-Force “leadership”: two days in week 7 (9-13.02.04); agreement by the Plenary task-Force on the third day • Transmission of “Final” report mid-week 8 to JAA and EUROCONTROL management for approval (Late February-early March)

  19. State of Play/Next Steps • Transmission of “Final” report mid-week 8 to JAA and EUROCONTROL management for approval (Late February-early March) • More details on the process can be found in Attachment 4 to this presentation

  20. Conclusion • Broad scope of work. • A lot of enthusiasm led to good progress! • More efforts needed to truly achieve the concept for UAV Regulations • Final Report should be available in March 2004 • Final Report will be used by EASA and/or JAA and EUROCONTROL as appropriate.

  21. End of the presentation • Thank you very much for your attention! • Your comments/reactions are welcome!

  22. Attachment 1 • More details on the Terms of Reference

  23. Terms of Reference (3) • Concept to be based on: • An identification of the various UAV technologies and an identification of possible use. • Consider the creation of categories • Identify lower mass limit for regulation at European level • Review existing material (Existing or draft standards; Research studies) • Consider the use of a total system approach

  24. Terms of Reference (4) • Particular attention to: • Approval of operator issues • Legal issues in relation to ICAO Convention Article 8 • Terminology issues

  25. Terms of Reference (5) • Composition of the Task-Force: • In accordance with JAR-11(JAA Regulatory and Related Procedures): in addition to our classical list, organisations that can contribute have been invited. • In accordance with EUROCONTROLrequirements for Stakeholders involvement.

  26. Attachment 2 • More details on the discussions items included in the scope of the Task-Force

  27. General • Scope issues: • Minimum weight • All categories of Airspace • Applicability to State UAVs • Need to focus ? and how ? • Persons on board ? • Categorisation

  28. General • Overall objective of regulating UAVs • Safety Objectives; Safety Targets. • Interaction with EASA • Top-down integrated approach • Safety assessments

  29. General • Terminology • Definition of UAV system: • ground component also ? • Levels of automation/Autonomy • Performance • Others: • Flight Termination System • Automated Vehicle Control Station

  30. ICAO • ICAO Convention Article 8 issue • Sense & Avoid/See & Avoid • Aircraft type Designators • Aircraft markings

  31. Airworthiness & Continued Airworthiness • Definition of airworthiness for UAV • How to define Airworthiness requirements? • Kinetic energy criteria to select an existing code for a given project and then adapt • Using a lethality criteria create UAV codes based on JAR-VLA,-23,-25 but with different weight limits • Essential requirements • For specific cases, restricted certificates with operational limitations • Tailoring of existing codes; • Others?

  32. Airworthiness & Continued Airworthiness • Certification or other approaches. • Self-Certification • Third party certification by accredited bodies • Credit for Flight Termination systems • Continuing airworthiness issues ?

  33. Environment • Noise and emissions • Requirements • Frequencies for vehicle control • Public acceptance

  34. Operations, Maintenance & Licensing • Operators organisation approval • Standard Operating Procedures • multiple operations by one pilot • Requirements competence • Licensing (Including medical) • Terrain Avoidance • Harmonisation with States UAV • Definitions: • UAV Commander • UAV pilot

  35. Air Traffic Management • Communications architecture • Guiding principles for Air Traffic Management • Sense and Avoid issue • Equipment • Standard Operating Procedures • Relationships with EUROCONTROL

  36. Security • Established Security level • Retention of control by Operator • Deployment and self destruct • Interference with ATM • Control of sales* • Physical security of ground-stations* * : not within aviation authorities remit

  37. Attachment 3 • Detailed outline of the draft report

  38. Outline of the Draft report (1) • 0)Executive Summary: TBD • 1)Introductory Information: • 1.1 Current regulatory Environment • 1.2 Future UAV Applications • 1.3 Background to the Task-force • 2)General Safety and Security: • 2.1 System Approach to Regulatory Determination • 2.2 UAV System Principles and Terminology • 2.3 Safety: TBD • 2.4 Security • 2.5 Communications, Command and Control

  39. Outline of the Draft report (2) • 3) Airworthiness, Continued Airworthiness and Environment: • 3.1 Scope/Introduction • 3.2 Definitions • 3.3 Involved organisations: TBD • 3.4 UAV systems components to be certified • 3.5 Survey of existing UAV regulatory material • 3.6 Type of regulation approach and certification levels • 3.7 Continued Airworthiness issues • 3.8 Environment • 3.9 Major Technical issues • 3.10 Conclusions and recommendations: TBD

  40. Outline of the Draft report (3) • 4)Operations, Maintenance & Licensing: • 4.1 Methodology • 4.2 Topics: • Collision Avoidance • Equipment • Licences and Rating • Emergency procedures • Operator certification • Responsibilities and Hand-over • Others

  41. Outline of the Draft report (4) • 5)Air Traffic Management: • 5.1 Current situation in ATM • 5.2 Summary on T-F identified ATM issues. • 6)Conclusions: TBD • 7)Recommendations: TBD

  42. Outline of the Draft report (5) • Annexes: • UAV Task-Force Terms of Reference • List of Participants and Contributors • WG I; II; III Terms of Reference • Other organisations involved in Aviation regulations • Future UAV applications

  43. Outline of the Draft report (6) • Appendices: • Principles for the approach to regulatory determination • Safety • UAV categorisation. • Light UAV systems. • Draft proposal to amend EASA regulation • Impact energy method for establishing design standards • UAV safety objectives method for establishing design standards • Identification of subjects (WGIII) • Discussion of subjects (WG III) • Licenses and ratings.

  44. Attachment 4 • Detailed process leading to final report

  45. Task-Force Internal process • Confirm format of report and leaders on each Paragraph/ sub-paragraph of the first draft report: September 4. Done • Leaders to provide their input to Central JAA (CJAA): September 30. Done • First Draft report distributed to all task-force members: October 7. Done • Comments from all to leaders with copy to CJAA: November 7. Particular attention to interfaces issues

  46. Task-Force Internal process • Meeting of Task-Force leadership to produce second draft report: 20-21 November • Second draft report sent to all Task Force members: November 28 • Agreement on third draft report: Plenary Task-Force meeting: two days in week 50 (10-11 December)

  47. Outside consultations before presentation to JAA & EUROCONTROL Management • First draft sent to Central JAA Divisions for advance reactions: October 7. One day Meeting Task- Force leadership? with them week 45 (7 November) to gather reactions. • Advance reactions in EUROCONTROL before November 14 for SRC; Others in EUROCONTROL? • Other advance reactions?

  48. Outside consultations before presentation to JAA & EUROCONTROL Management • “Formal” outside consultation by JAA on third draft report Division/ Sectorial teams; EUROCONTROL system; Others?: December 19. (With copy to all task-force members) • Comments from “outside” consultation January 30, 2004. • Review of comments by Task Force leadership: two days in week 7 (February 9-13); agreement by the Plenary Task-Force on the third day

  49. Presentation to JAA & EUROCONTROL Management • Transmission to JAAC mid-week 8 should allow to present the report to JAAC on 24.02.04 • Transmission to EUROCONTROL SRC for approval mid-week 8 in view of approval late February/early March 2004

  50. Attachment 5 • Safety Case Considerations

More Related