1 / 1

Hanning Zhou (hanzhou@amazon) and Don Kimber (kimber@fxpal )

Unusual Event Detection via Multi-camera Video Mining. Step 1: Temporal segmentation. Introduction Goal : detecting unusual events from a large amount of multiple stream video. Challenges : multi-stream video lack of labeled data Approach : semi-supervised learning.

banyan
Télécharger la présentation

Hanning Zhou (hanzhou@amazon) and Don Kimber (kimber@fxpal )

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Unusual Event Detection via Multi-camera Video Mining Step 1: Temporal segmentation • Introduction • Goal: detecting unusual events from a large amount of multiple stream video. • Challenges: multi-stream video lack of labeled data • Approach: semi-supervised learning Hanning Zhou (hanzhou@amazon.com) and Don Kimber (kimber@fxpal.com ) static scene …… ………………………… ………………… ……… …… • Applications • Online • Detect unusual events alarm in surveillance system • Offline • Detect highlights from sport videos • Analyze business process • Other data streams • audio, text and multimodal data streams Segment k + 1 Segment k • Step 2: Feature extraction • Feature: • size and location of the motion blobs • clustered into GMMs • Advantage: • higher spatial resolution than motion histogram [Zhang ‘05] [Zhong ‘04] • New problem: spatial alignment • Solved with approximate KL-divergence [Goldberger ‘03] • Key Idea • Collaborative mining of multiple streams • Sensor network is prevailing • Events from different sensors are related • Two-Stage Training • Unusual events are rare • Manual labeling is intractable • Step 3: Training a Model for usual event • 1st Stage: Bootstrap • Clustering: keep the large clusters • User feedback: exam the small clusters • 2nd Stage: Train CHMM for usual events • Inference in CHMM is efficient O(T(CN)^2) vs O(TN^(2C)) • statistic model to handle variant durations, noisy observation and asynchrony • The hidden state depends on 3D location of the objects • The observations are 2D projection of the objects • CHMM as a loose stereo • Dependent chains • Previous Work • General Event Detection • specific event with well-defined model • supervised statistical learning (DTW, HMM, factor graph) • Unusual Event Detection • unsupervised [Zhong & Shi ‘04] • semi-supervised [Zhang et al. ‘05] • All above are from single stream • Experimental Results • Trained on one week’s video recorded in FXPAL • Tested on another week’s video • usual events: pass by, pick up print outs • unusual events: distribute mails, open multiple drawers to look for stationery, open the cabinet, multiple people • Quantitative experiments on Terrascope data • 48 segments in 4 scenarios • usual events: group meeting, natural video sequence • unusal events: group exit, intruder, theft, suspicious behavior The 3D location inferred from different cameras are RELATED Exact stereo does not work well, because: gaps between the views wide baseline, few correspondences Examples of usual events • Step 4: Detecting usual event • Evaluating the likelihood with forward-backward algorithm [Brand ‘97] Examples of unusual events ROC curve of HMM vs CHMM on Terrascope data Terrascope dataset camera setup Courtesy of Christopher Jaynes Mailroom camera setup

More Related