1 / 4

Corbett and Eberle 34

Corbett and Eberle 34. Definition: Induction—the accrual of particular phenomenon or particular examples that lead you to a general conclusion. Process 1,2,3,4,5,6,7… inductive leap conclusion. Inductive warrant. Constant conjunction (David Hume) But (Hume concedes)

bela
Télécharger la présentation

Corbett and Eberle 34

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Corbett and Eberle 34 • Definition: • Induction—the accrual of particular phenomenon or particular examples that lead you to a general conclusion. • Process • 1,2,3,4,5,6,7… inductive leap conclusion

  2. Inductive warrant • Constant conjunction (David Hume) • But (Hume concedes) • The fact that one event occurs after another provides no ground for expecting a recurrence of the sequence.

  3. Induction as deduction • Induction is best understood as the enthymematic form of the hypothetical syllogism.

  4. If a social correlation is non-random, then it is caused by discrimination. • The correlation between employment and footsizeiness is non random. • The correlation is caused by discrimination

More Related