1 / 8

ECAL days, 17 June 2014 Andrea Benaglia – SPACAL results SPACAL with SiO 2 :Ce

ECAL days, 17 June 2014 Andrea Benaglia – SPACAL results SPACAL with SiO 2 :Ce. Moliere radius versus fraction of Tungsten in Cu-W alloy. Current EE PbWO 4 R M = 2.2 cm. 3D W printing??. Colours: correspond to different fiber diameters Different points: different fiber spacing.

belita
Télécharger la présentation

ECAL days, 17 June 2014 Andrea Benaglia – SPACAL results SPACAL with SiO 2 :Ce

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ECAL days, 17 June 2014 Andrea Benaglia – SPACAL results SPACAL with SiO2:Ce Moliere radius versus fraction of Tungsten in Cu-W alloy Current EE PbWO4 RM = 2.2 cm 3D W printing?? Colours: correspond to different fiber diameters Different points: different fiber spacing

  2. Radiation length versus fraction of Tungsten in Cu-W alloy SPACAL with SiO2:Ce Current EE PbWO4 Xo = 0.9 cm 3D W printing?? Colours: correspond to different fiber diameters Different points: different fiber spacing

  3. Moliere radius versus fibre spacing for 25%Cu-75%W SPACAL with SiO2:Ce Current EE PbWO4 RM = 2.2 cm Optimal geometry Fiber diameter: 0.8mm--‐1mm Distance: 1.4--‐1.6mm Can read off the fibre distances used in the simulation

  4. Radiation length versus fibre spacing for 25% Cu - 75% W SPACAL with SiO2:Ce Current EE PbWO4 Xo = 0.9 cm Optimal geometry Fiber diameter: 0.8mm--‐1mm Distance: 1.4--‐1.6mm

  5. Resolution versus fibre spacing for 25% Cu - 75% W SPACAL with SiO2:Ce Resolution at 1 GeV Current EE PbWO4 Resolution 20% at 1 GeV (stoch only ??) Optimal geometry Fiber diameter: 0.8mm--‐1mm Distance: 1.4--‐1.6mm

  6. Resolution, SPACAL with SiO2:Ce 25% Cu – 75% W Fiberdiameter 1.0 mm Fiber spacing 1.6 mm Fiberdiameter 0.8 mm Fiber spacing 1.4 mm Inputs: SiO2:Ce Light Yield = 103 photons/MeV Inputs: Efficiency = 0.01

  7. Some SPACAL numbers of interest to extract: • Energy lost in liquid scintillator • Photons emitted by liquid scintillator ‘at source’ • Photons lost by exiting capillary to metal surround • Photons exiting capillary at end (other end mirrored, not mirrored) • Photons exiting capillary at end (other end mirrored, not mirrored) • per unit of deposited energy, as a function of z

  8. SPACAL design considerations: • What is actual resolution target in CMS ? • We have learnt that a significant amount of resolution is • lost due to the upstream tracker material budget • Further deterioration due to pile-up • No point in “over” design • Cost • Time • Complexity • No return • Irrespective of the physics targets, can we set an upper resolution limit using the upstream tracker material as the limiter alone ??? • Need full CMS SIM to study this with a ‘final’ tracker geometry. Take the current tracker for now ???

More Related