1 / 39

TEI GRAND ROUND

TEI GRAND ROUND. REFRACTIVE SURGERY: BIOPTICS AND CORRECTION OF DECENTERED ABLATIONS 06 Jul 05. Bioptics for myopia – Case 1. Case Summary. 23/Chinese/Female No PMHx Severe Myopia Pre Op. Case Summary. Listed for AC PIOL for Myopia Rt IOL – 28 Jun 04 Lt IOL – 05 Jul 04

benjamin
Télécharger la présentation

TEI GRAND ROUND

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TEI GRAND ROUND REFRACTIVE SURGERY: BIOPTICS AND CORRECTION OF DECENTERED ABLATIONS 06 Jul 05

  2. Bioptics for myopia – Case 1

  3. Case Summary • 23/Chinese/Female • No PMHx • Severe Myopia • Pre Op

  4. Case Summary • Listed for AC PIOL for Myopia • Rt IOL – 28 Jun 04 • Lt IOL – 05 Jul 04 • Post IOL Op (3.5 mths)

  5. Case Summary • Pre op suitability testing for enhancement via LASIK • ECC : OD 2700; OS 2500 • Contrast sensitivity: N (F.A.C.T) • Orbscan: OD 554 um; OS 555um • 19 Nov 04 Intralase & LASIK done for Rt eye (-1.70DS/-2.25DC/40) • Intralase.MPG • Flap Lifting.MPG

  6. Case Summary • Post LASIK (2 months)

  7. Bioptics for Myopia - Case 2

  8. Case Summary • Ms N • 24 year old / Chinese Malaysian / F • Contact lens intolerant with GPC / Peripheral vascularization • poor LASIK candidate (OD 539mm, OS 506mm)

  9. Case Summary • Lt AC PIOL with inferior AK • Rt AC PIOL with inferior AK

  10. Case Summary • Patient underwent Rt intralase and LASIK

  11. Update on Bioptics

  12. Bioptics • Defined as combination of 2 procedures1 • Phakic IOL implantation followed by LASIK to correct high degrees of refractive error • Maximal degree of myopia or hyperopia intended to be corrected by the IOL • Residual refractive error corrected with LASIK after 1 – 3 mths

  13. Efficacy of PIOL for high myopic • Artisan PIOL – Benedetti et al9 • UCVA > 20/40 - 83.8% (Myopia -6.75 to 15.5D) • UCVA > 20/40 - 68.0% (Myopia -16 to 23D) • Complications • Iris atrophy 11.8% • Lens decentration 5.4% • Night glare 6.4% • Mean Endothelial cell loss11: 0.87-3.9% (12 mths) and 0.78 - 5.4% (24 mths)

  14. Efficacy of PIOL for high myopic • Comaparsion of PIOL positional stability– Baumeister et al10 • AC PIOL – No Sig. Ant-post mvt • PC IOL – Sig mvt towards crystalline lens • Optical Axis Rotation • Nuvita – 1.9 degrees • Artisan – 0.6 degrees • ICL – 0.9 degrees • AC IOL (iris fixated) - Best positional stability

  15. Contraindications for PIOL • Contraindications for PIOL • AC depth < 3mm • Endothelial cell counts < 2000 • Previous lens opacities • Ant segment pathologies

  16. Limitations of individual modalities • LASIK for high myopics (>-12.0D) • Limited corrective magnitude dependent on corneal thickness • Increased level of side effects secondary to increased corneal depth ablation • PIOL • IOL decentration and displacement • Cataract formation • Pupillary block glaucoma • Inflammatory lens precipitates • Anterior Chamber (Uveitis – Glaucoma – Hyphema Syndrome, Endothelial decompensation)

  17. Bioptics • Key Advantages • Utilises best of both worlds • Increases possible range of surgical correction for myopia and hyperopia with decreased side effects • Good predictability with LASIK • Better functional vision post LASIK • Key Disadvantages • Staged - Interval between surgeries • 2 separate procedures hence increase surgical risk • Complications related to PIOL • Complications related to LASIK

  18. Evolution of Bioptics • Described by Roberto Zaldivar2,4,5 • In 1988, he used AC PIOLs (Angle Fixated) alone. • Baikoff or Nuvita Lens. • Many AC PIOL related complications

  19. Evolution of Bioptics • In 1996, Zaldivar pioneered bioptics technique. 2 • PC instead of AC PIOL (STAAR AG ICL) • Combination follow on of LASIK after PC PIOLs • PC considered better site vs AC 4,5 • Risk of endothelial damage minimised • Fewer incidences of Halos or glares • However, key specific disadvs were noted 4,5 • Decentration • Risk of cataractogenesis & PCO formation • Pupillary block glaucoma

  20. Evolution of Bioptics • Jose Guell modified the bioptics technique6 • Termed ARS approach • Utilises AC PIOL but IRIS fixated • Artisan non-toric lens • LASIK flap performed before IOL implantation • 6mm optical zone for both procedures7 • Key specific advantages vs PC IOL • Endothelial-IOL contact during microkeratome pass avoided8 • No potential risk of PC PIOL dislocation during suction

  21. Comparsion of PC vs AC PIOL1

  22. Suggested choice for each Patient • Myopia -9.0 to -12.0D – LASIK • Myopia -12.0D to -15.0D – Phakic IOL implantation • Myopia > 15.0D – Bioptics • More than 50yrs or early lens opacification – Lens extraction with LASIK for residual refractive error

  23. In the pipeline • Toric AC PIOL lens12 • Mean post op astigmatism – 0.56D/ Axis 31 degrees • 6 mnth follow up – No significant rotation observed • LASEK with AC PIOL13 • Murta et al used LASEK as an alternative to LASIK • 32 eyes in 18 patients • Mean Pre Op SE -16.2D • Artisan AC PIOL followed by LASEK 2-3 mths later • 90% +1D emmetropia; 71.9% +0.5 D emmetropia • LASEK Cx – Epi Defect 1st POD 72%; Grd 1 haze 12.5% • Implications – Alternative for LASIK incompatible • Intralase for LASIK flap creation

  24. References • Guell, Vazquez. Bioptics, Int Ophth Clin, Summ 2000. • Zaldivar, Oscherow, Ricur. The STAAR Posterior Chamber Phakic Intraocular lens. Int Ophth Clin, Summ 2000. • Zaldivar, Oscherow, Ricur. Implantable contact lens. In: Clear corneal lens surgery. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK, 1999. • Zaldivar, Davidorf, Oscherow. Combined posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens and laser in stu keratomileusis: bioptics for extreme myopia. J Refract Surg 1999. • Zaldivar, Davidorf, oscherow. Posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens for myopia -8 to -19 diopters. J Refract Surg 1998. • Guell JL. The adjustable refractive surgery concept (ARS). [Letter] J Refract Surg 1998. • Guell, Vazquez. ARS ( Adjustable Refractive Surgery): 6mm Artisan lens plus LASIK for correction of high myopia. AAO meeting Orlando, Oct 99. • Endothelial study of iris claw phakic lens: four year follow up. J Refract Surg 98. • Benedetti, Casamenti, Marcaccio. Correction of myopia of 7 to 24 dioptres with artisan phakic intraocular lens: 2 yr follow up. J Refract Surg 2005 • Baumeister, Buhren, Kohnen. Position of angle supported, iris fixated and cilary sulcus implanted myopic PIOL evaluated by Scheimpflug photography • Pop M, Payette. Initial results of ECC after artisan lens for phakic eyes. Ophthalmology Feb 2004 • Tehrani. Postoperative astigmatism and rotational stability after artisan toric phakic IOL implantation. J Cataaract Refract Surg Sep 2003 • Murta et al. Artisan phakic IOL implantation followed by LASEK. 7th ESCRS Winter Refractive Surgery Meeting.

  25. Ms T • 32 year old / Chinese / Malaysian / F • Originally bilateral high myope of approximately –16D. • OD conventional PRK 1 month previously in Kuala Lumpur • 4 days later, OS clear-lens extraction: aphakic

  26. Refraction at presentation: • OD: -4.00/-1.50 x 50: 6/15 • OS: +0.75/-1.50 x 180: 6/12 • OD decentered ablation complicated by anterior basement membrane dystrophy with subepithelial scarring.

  27. OD post-op corneal topo • OD superior decentration of central ablation zone. Central visual axis is undercorrected with resultant lower and higher order aberrations. • Clinically, pt c/o starburst effect and increasing anisometropia • Rx? Prevention, miotics, RGP lenses • Enhancement, wave-front / topography guided

  28. Wavefront assessment • Undilated –8.37/-1.53 x 97, pupil size 4.85 • Dilated –7.44/2.76 x 17 (least amount of higher order aberrations)

  29. Post-wavefront PTK correction: • UCVA: 6/7.5 • Refraction: plano / -0.50: 6/6

  30. Post-PRK / LASIK decentration • PRK centration accurate to within 1.0 mm in over 92% of cases and visual acuity is relatively preserved despite deviations from perfect centration Topographical analysis of the centration of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy.Cavanaugh TB, Durrie DS, Riedel SM, Hunkeler JD, Lesher MP. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993;19 Suppl:136-43.

  31. Centration of keratorefractive procedures from the pupil is important and influences lower / higher order aberrations. • Centration was measured more accurately from the pupillary center (0.40 mm) than from the corneal vertex (0.44 mm). Centration of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy relative to the pupil.Cavanaugh TB, Durrie DS, Riedel SM, Hunkeler JD, Lesher MP. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993;19 Suppl:144-8.

  32. Conventional PTK for decentered ablations • repeat PTK using technique where a circle of adherent epithelium overlying the decentered ablation served as a mask. Retreatment of decentered excimer photorefractive keratectomy ablations.Lim-Bon-Siong R, Williams JM, Steinert RF, Pepose JS. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997 Jan;123(1):122-4. Diametral ablation--a technique to manage decentered photorefractive keratectomy for myopia.Alkara N, Genth U, Seiler T. J Refract Surg. 1999 Jul-Aug;15(4):436-40.

  33. Wave-front guided LASIK / PTK • Achievement of reduction in refractive cylinder, increase in uncorrected visual acuity, and improved corneal regularity in the majority of patients with severe corneal irregularities e.g. decentered / small optical zones after LASIK or irregular astigmatism after keratoplasty / trauma. Poorer results in small irregularities e.g. central islands. Topographically-guided laser in situ keratomileusis to treat corneal irregularities.Knorz MC, Jendritza B. Ophthalmology. 2000 Jun;107(6):1138-43. Selective zonal ablations with excimer laser for correction of irregular astigmatism induced by refractive surgery.Alio JL, Artola A, Rodriguez-Mier FA. Ophthalmology. 2000 Apr;107(4):662-73. Early clinical experience using custom excimer laser ablations to treat irregular astigmatism. Tamayo Fernandez GE, Serrano MG. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000 Oct;26(10):1442-50.

  34. Topography-guided wave-front: for scarred / extremely irregular corneas • combination of topographic data with computer controlled flying-spot excimer laser ablation was suitable for correcting irregular astigmatism after significant (>1mm) postmyopic PRK decentrations. Topography-driven excimer laser for the retreatment of decentralized myopic photorefractive keratectomy.Alessio G, Boscia F, La Tegola MG, Sborgia C.Ophthalmology. 2001 Sep;108(9):1695-703. Topographically supported customized ablation for the management of decentered laser in situ keratomileusis.Kymionis GD, Panagopoulou SI, Aslanides IM, Plainis S, Astyrakakis N, Pallikaris IG. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 May;137(5):806-11. Aberration-sensing and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: management of decentered ablation.Mrochen M, Krueger RR, Bueeler M, Seiler T. J Refract Surg. 2002 Jul-Aug;18(4):418-29.

  35. Higher-order aberrations? • Total and higher-order RMS aberrations decreased by 40 - 45%, after C-CAP treatment. • Topography-driven C-CAP method is effective in post-surgical decentration to enhance the overall quality of vision, reduce patient-perceived visual aberrations, regularize the corneal surface, and maximize BCVA. Custom-contoured ablation pattern method for the treatment of decentered laser ablations.Lin DY, Manche EE. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Aug;30(8):1675-84.

  36. Thank you

  37. Specs. of Artisan Myopic lens

More Related