1 / 8

Evaluating online sources

Evaluating online sources. Today’s goals. Explain appropriate online research methods. Analyze websites for their validity and reliability. Google and Wikipedia. Google: Anything can be “googled” Not all information, even information at the top of the list, is “good” Wikipedia:

berke
Télécharger la présentation

Evaluating online sources

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Evaluating online sources

  2. Today’s goals • Explain appropriate online research methods. • Analyze websites for their validity and reliability.

  3. Google and Wikipedia • Google: • Anything can be “googled” • Not all information, even information at the top of the list, is “good” • Wikipedia: • Tons of information • Anyone can make edits to most pages • Can be a starting point for research • Check resources at bottom of page

  4. What Does it mean to evaluate, and why do we need to do it? • Evaluate: • To form an idea, analyze, judge • We evaluate online sources for: • Content: what is the purpose of the website? • Credibility: who is the author and is he/she qualified and unbiased? • Currency: how current is the site and are the links up to date? • Clarity: is the information well written and is the site well organized?

  5. What do We need to know? • The 5 W’s are helpful: • WHO wrote the article? • What are their qualifications? • How well-known is the author? • WHAT did they write? • Is it in their field of expertise? • WHEN did they write it? • Have there been new developments since publication? • Is the information still relevant? • WHERE was the article written? • Where was it published? • Is it a well-known publication? • WHY did they write it? • Do they have a reason for taking one side or another?

  6. Another method for evaluating: “cars” • No, not the cars from the popular Disney movie. • Not the fast, sporty ones you dream about owning. • A method of evaluating whether or not an online source is worth using.

  7. Using “Cars” • Credibility: • Who is the author and is he/she an expert in the field? • What are their credentials? • Accuracy: • Is the information up-to-date? • What is the author’s purpose? • Reasonableness: • Is the information biased? • Are all sides of an argument considered? • Support: • What documentation does the author use? • Are sources listed and have other authors used this work?

  8. In-Class Activity • Evaluate these online sources using either the 5 W’s or “CARS.” • Even though these are websites and not specific articles, we can use the same methods for evaluating the credibility of the website. • Record your findings in your Interactive Notebook. • Be prepared to share your findings with the class. • http://www.dhmo.org/ • http://zapatopi.net/treeoctopus/ • http://edition.cnn.com/ • https://www.science.gov/

More Related