1 / 40

The Differential Outcomes Effect: Teaching Verbal Operants

The Differential Outcomes Effect: Teaching Verbal Operants. Michelle Olson, M.S, Mark Harvey, Ph.D, BCBA Ansley Hodges, M.S., BCBA, Eb Blakely, Ph.D, BCBA-D Florida Institute of Technology and QuestKids. Typical Procedure. Differential Outcomes Procedure.

bethan
Télécharger la présentation

The Differential Outcomes Effect: Teaching Verbal Operants

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Differential Outcomes Effect: Teaching Verbal Operants Michelle Olson, M.S, Mark Harvey, Ph.D, BCBA Ansley Hodges, M.S., BCBA, Eb Blakely, Ph.D, BCBA-D Florida Institute of Technology and QuestKids

  2. Typical Procedure

  3. Differential Outcomes Procedure • Different reinforcers in a discrimination task, correlated with each kind of response Differential Outcomes Effect Increase rate of acquisition and/or maintain higher steady state performance

  4. Lab Studies With Nonhumans:Variety of discrimination Paradigms Two Choice Discrimination Experiments

  5. Two-Choice Procedure: Correlated Outcomes Light Light

  6. Two-Choice Control Procedure:Uncorrelated Outcomes Light Light

  7. Two-Choice Control Procedure:Confound???? 1. Two reinforcers2. Correlated outcomes Typical DOE Food Food Food Water

  8. Human Application: Correlated Outcomes

  9. Human Application:Uncorrelated Outcomes

  10. Experiment 1: Extension to Verbal Operants • Two boys with autism – 8 and 5 years old • QuestKids Academy –

  11. Experiment 1 Design • Alternating Treatments • Dependent Variable: • % correct of intraverbal responses • Independent Variable: • Correlated vs. Uncorrelated outcomes

  12. Baseline Procedure

  13. General Treatment Procedure

  14. Intraverbal Tasks Correlated Task Uncorrelated Task

  15. Video • Show video Clip

  16. Santi: Intraverbals Correlated Task Uncorrelated Task

  17. Results Experiment 1: Santi

  18. Josh: Intraverbals Correlated Task Uncorrelated Task

  19. Results Experiment 1: Josh Decreased # experimenters

  20. Experiment 2: Extension to Intraverbals and Tacts • Two different boys with autism both 8 years old • QuestKids Academy –

  21. Experiment 2 • Design: • Alternating Treatments • Multiple baseline across verbal operants • Dependent Variable: • % correct responses • Note: 100% and 97%, IOA respectively • Independent Variable: • Correlated vs. Uncorrelated outcomes

  22. Caliel: Tacts Correlated Task Uncorrelated Task

  23. Caliel: Intraverbals Correlated Task Uncorrelated Task

  24. ResultsExperiment 2: Caliel

  25. Austin: Tacts Correlated Task Uncorrelated Task

  26. Austin: Intraverbals Correlated Task Uncorrelated Task

  27. ResultsExperiment 2: Austin

  28. Discussion of Austin Why was uncorrelated more effective? Correlated Task

  29. Summary of Results

  30. Discussion • DOE procedure has promise in teaching verbal operants, especially intraverbals • Task difficulty critical element • Use when traditional procedures don’t work

  31. Discussion • Future Directions • Intraverbals replications • Recall / Comprehension (DTMS) • Different ages / abilities

  32. End For this PowerPoint and references Website: www.fitaba.com Email: eblakely@questinc.org

  33. Differential Outcomes Effect Match-to-Sample

  34. Traditional Discrimination Training Assay: Match-to-sample Food Food Choice stimuli Sample stimulus

  35. DOE Procedure Food Drink Sample stimulus

  36. DOE Procedure Food Drink Sample stimulus

  37. DOE Control Procedures Uncorrelated Correlated .5 Food/.5 Drink .5 Food/.5 Drink Food Drink Sample stimulus Sample stimulus

  38. DOE Procedure: Application Academic Tasks Candy Soda A B SD: “Point to A” SD: “Point to B”

  39. DOE Procedure: Application Recall Tasks Candy Soda “Sandwich” “My friend Will” SD: “What did you just eat?” SD: “Who did you just talk to?”

  40. Exercises • The DOE is an effect in which different _________ are used for different ________ in a discrimination task. • What is the proper control procedure in a DOE study? • Pick a task that you are teaching, and design a DOE procedure for it.

More Related