1 / 35

Peritonitis Priorities

Peritonitis Priorities. Paul Finan Department of Colorectal Surgery Leeds General Infirmary. Peritonitis Classification. Primary - often spontaneous and single organism Secondary - multiple organisms, perforations, leaks, ischaemia etc

blair-barlow
Télécharger la présentation

Peritonitis Priorities

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Peritonitis Priorities Paul Finan Department of Colorectal Surgery Leeds General Infirmary

  2. PeritonitisClassification • Primary - often spontaneous and single organism • Secondary - multiple organisms, perforations, leaks, ischaemia etc • Tertiary - no organisms, disturbance in host immune response

  3. Priorities in PeritonitisEarly Recognition • Often classical clinical picture but…. • Beware of immuno-suppressed patients • Elderly patients • Post-operative patients with cardiac problems • Unexplained failure to progress clinically

  4. Peritonitis PrioritiesRadiological Support • Plain films e.g. free gas or unexplained ileus • Abdominal ultrasound – simple collections • CT scanning – of particular value in the post-operative patient • Labelled white cell scans • MR imaging – no experience

  5. Peritonitis on CT Scanning

  6. Peritonitis Priorities Wound Care Specialists Radiologist Anaesthetist Nutritional Team Nursing Staff Microbiologist Surgical Staff

  7. Scoring Systems

  8. Scoring Systems An effort to quantify case mix and so estimate outcome • APACHE – initially 34 variables • APACHE II – reduced to 12 variables • Sepsis Score (SS) • Sepsis Severity Score (SSS)

  9. Relationship Between APACHE-IIand Mortality

  10. Prognostic Scoring Systems in Peritonitis Comparison of APACHE II, APS, SSS, MOF and MPI, in 50 patients with peritonitis • All scoring systems predicted outcome in univariate analysis • APACHE II and MPI contributed independently in a multivariate analysis • All patients with an APACHE II of >20 or MPI >27 died in hospital Bosscha et al 1997

  11. Peritonitis Priorities Source Control Source Control Damage Limitation

  12. Source Control • Drainage of abscesses • Debridement of devitalised tissue • Diversion, repair or excision of focus of infection from a hollow viscus

  13. Source ControlDrainage of abscesses Surgical or non-surgical drainage governed by.. • Clinical state of patient • Site of collection • Extent of collection • Underlying aetiology

  14. Diverticular Abscess

  15. Drainage of Diverticular Abscess

  16. Drainage of Diverticular Abscess

  17. Non-surgical Drainage of Intra-abdominal Abscesses A study of PCD in 96 patients with 137 abscesses accumulated over a 3-year period • Successful resolution in 70% after a single procedure and 82% with a second drainage • More often successful in post-operative abscesses. • Poorer results with pancreatic abscesses and those containing yeasts Cinat et al 2002

  18. Non-surgical drainage of Intra-abdominal Abscesses A study of 75 patients undergoing PCD of intra-abdominal abscess • Successful treatment in 62/75 patients (83%) • Success associated with unilocular collections, <200 mls., APACHE score <30 and accessible regions Betsch et al 2002

  19. Pancreatic Collection

  20. Pancreatic Drainage

  21. Source ControlDebridement of Devascularised Tissue • Most commonly encountered in necrotic pancreatitis • Removal of dead bowel • Debridement of other necrotic intra-abdominal tissue

  22. Source ControlManagement of the Source of Contamination • Excision – appendicitis, cholecystitis • Repair – perforated ulcer, early iatrogenic injury • Diversion +/- excision – leaking anastamosis NB These are the decisions that require experience

  23. Damage Limitation • Procedures at the time of surgery • Decisions in the post-operative period

  24. Peritoneal Lavage

  25. Damage LimitationDecisions at the time of Surgery • Management of the infective source • Peritoneal toilet and removal of particulate matter • Peritoneal lavage • Drains • Wound closure

  26. VAC Dressing

  27. Damage LimitationPost-operative Decisions • Re-laparotomy • Laparostomy • Interval imaging • Duration of antibiotic therapy

  28. Re-laparotomy in Peritonitis • Failure to progress clinically • Prompted by radiological imaging • Where viability is in doubt • Failure to control source of infection

  29. Relaparotomy for Secondary Peritonitis Meta-analysis comparing planned relaparotomy and laparotomy on demand • No randomised studies • Non-significant reduction in mortality with the latter approach • Evidence based on eight heterogeneous studies Lamme et al 2002

  30. Laparostomy Abdominal wall cannot or should not be closed • Major loss of the abdominal wall • Visceral or retroperitoneal oedema • If decision has already been taken to perform a re-laparotomy • Likelihood of creating abdominalcompartment syndrome

  31. Peritonitis Priorities Wound Care Specialists Radiologist Anaesthetist Nutritional Team Nursing Staff Microbiologist Surgical Staff

  32. Antibiotics in Peritonitis • Consideration to source of infection and likely bacteria • Fewer drugs for shorter periods of time • A policy of reculture and change if necessary • No clear benefit of a particular regimen in the Cochrane review (Wong et al 2005)

  33. Peritonitis PrioritiesConclusions • Multi-disciplinary approach • Increasing role of the radiologist • Emphasis on source control • Need for correct decision at time of laparotomy • Lack of trial evidence

More Related