1 / 26

Tiling Deficient Boards Using L- Pentominoes

Tiling Deficient Boards Using L- Pentominoes. By: Akhil Upneja. L Pentomino. Polyomino consisting of five 1x1 squares All eight reflections and rotations. Deficient Boards. Polysolver. Powerful programming tool

blaze
Télécharger la présentation

Tiling Deficient Boards Using L- Pentominoes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Tiling Deficient Boards Using L-Pentominoes By: Akhil Upneja

  2. L Pentomino • Polyomino consisting of five 1x1 squares • All eight reflections and rotations

  3. Deficient Boards

  4. Polysolver • Powerful programming tool • If types of tiles and type of board specified, will tell you if tileable or not, and give you all possible tilings • Proof relies on this program in some parts

  5. Theorem 1 • All deficient nxn boards can be tiled if: • n=1,4,6, or 9 (mod 10) • n≥14 • Four cases here to prove: • n=1 (mod 10) • n=4 (mod 10) • n=6 (mod 10) • n=9 (mod 10)

  6. Case 1: n=4 (mod 10) • 4x4 deficient board is simply too small • Jump to the next case: 14x14 deficient board

  7. Wedge Lemma

  8. Proof of Wedge Lemma • Consider: The shaded square shown • Recall: Square has eight symmetries

  9. Vertical Symmetry

  10. Horizontal Symmetry

  11. Diagonal or Rotational Symmetry

  12. Application of Wedge Lemma • Using Polysolver and the Wedge Lemma, we conclude that all of the 14x14 deficient boards can be tiled • However, need generalization for all n=4 (mod 10) cases

  13. Lemma 2 • If any deficient board with side length n can be tiled, all mxmboards such that m (mod 10)=nmod (10) and m>n can be tiled as well

  14. Proof of Lemma 2 • Consider the 24x24 deficient board in conjunction with the wedge lemma • Wedge has dimensions 12 by 12

  15. Proof of Lemma 2 (cont.) • Fit the 14x14 board inside the 24x24 board • All the wedge squares are filled because 14>n/2

  16. Proof of Lemma 2 (cont.) • Ignore the L shape left behind • Recall: All deficient 14x14 boards are tileable • Therefore, if we ignore the L shape, then all deficient 14x14 boards created by removing a square from the wedge are also tileable

  17. Last Step of Proof • Final step in this example is making sure L shape can be tiled in the general case

  18. How do we know this works every time? Region II = 10xn Region III = 10xm

  19. Last Lemma • Any 10xm rectangle such that m≥4 can be tiled • Proof: 2x5 and 5x2 blocks created using the L pentominoes

  20. Tiling Exists Case 1 proven

  21. Case 2: n=6 (mod 10) • Using Polysolver, all 16x16 deficient boards can be tiled • By extension, all deficient boards such that n=6 (mod 10) and n≥16 can be tiled

  22. Case 3: n=9 (mod 10) • All 19x19 deficient boards can be tiled, according to Polysolver • By extension, all deficient boards such that n=9 (mod 10) and n≥19 can be tiled

  23. Case 4: n=1 (mod 10) Putting the 14x14 board into the 21x21 board satisfied the wedge lemma, and the L shape was tileable

  24. Theorem 2 • If n=6, then the deficient board is tileable if and only if the deficient square has coordinates (1,2), (2,1), (5,1), (6,2), (1,5), (2,6), (5,6) or (6,5) • If n=9, then the deficient board is tileable if and only if the deficient square has coordinates (2,3), (2,7), (1,1), (1,3), (1,5), (1,7), (1,9), (5,1), (5,3), (5,5), (5,7), (5,9), (9,1), (9,3), (9,5), (9,7), (9,9), (3,1), (3,2), (3,5), (3,8), (3,9), (7,1), (7,2), (7,5), (7,8), or (7,9) • If n=11, then the deficient board is tileable if and only if the deficient square does not have coordinates (4,11), (8,11), (1,8), (1,4), (4,1), (8,1), (11,4), or (11,8) • Proof by Polysolver

  25. Still to Come • Formal generalization for deficient rectangles • Y-pentominoes?

  26. Thanks!

More Related