1 / 20

Eau Claire Area Study

Eau Claire Area Study. Northern MAPP Subregional Planning Group January 11, 2007 Daniel Kline. Outline. Description of Area Various Load Serving Problems Study Methodology & Initial Alternatives Final Alternatives Final Recommendation Questions. Description of Area.

bond
Télécharger la présentation

Eau Claire Area Study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Eau Claire Area Study Northern MAPP Subregional Planning Group January 11, 2007 Daniel Kline

  2. Outline • Description of Area • Various Load Serving Problems • Study Methodology & Initial Alternatives • Final Alternatives • Final Recommendation • Questions

  3. Description of Area • Located in West-Central Wisconsin • Eau Claire & Chippewa Counties • About an hour east of Twin Cities on I-94 • Area fed by 345 and 161 kV sources and 69 kV transmission • Load belonging to NSPW and DPC • Lines belonging toNSPW and DPC

  4. Description of Area • Area NSPW Sources: • Eau Claire Substation • Seven Mile Substation • Wheaton Substation • Chippewa River Generation • Area DPC Sources (2011): • Elk Mound Substation

  5. Description of Area • Area NSPW Loads (2011): • Jeffers Road (27 MW) • Truax (41 MW) • Otter Creek (35 MW) • London (42 MW) • Hallie (31 MW) • Area DPC Loads (2011): • Seymour (4 MW) • Elco (4 MW) • Equity (3 MW) • Washington (3 MW) • Brunswick (2 MW)

  6. Description of Area

  7. Description of Problems • Eau Claire transmission system is designed to rely upon Eau Claire 69 kV bus • Eau Claire 161/69 kV transformers are heavily loaded and cannot endure loss of parallel bank • Eau Claire substation is crowded and not enough space exists to increase the size of the existing 161/69 kV banks • Increasing size of banks would require moving to non-standard bank sizes

  8. Description of Problems • During peak load conditions, 69 kV system to north overloads • DPC system served out of Seven Mile overloads for various contingencies • High load growth throughout area • Interconnection requests at Hallie Substation requrie auto-transfer scheme to be turned off • Area transmission system highly susceptible to fluctuations in Chippewa River generation

  9. Study Methodology • 2006 MAPP Series Cases • 2011 Near-Term • 2016 Out-Year • Worked with DPC through Joint Planning Process

  10. Study Methodology • Assumptions and Adjustments made • Assumed Chisago Line Project not in service in 2011 (In-service in 2016) • Included New Richmond Area Load Serving Study projects • Assumed Monroe County – Council Creek 161 kV line in service in 2011 • Moved Riverview load to Hallie

  11. Study Methodology

  12. Study Methodology • Base Case Results • Base Case Results

  13. Initial Ideas • Reconductor double-circuit 69 kV corridor between Eau Claire and Chippewa Falls • Convert 69 kV double-circuit corridor to 161 kV • Add circuit breakers at Otter Creek • Shift load from 69 kV system to 161 kV system

  14. Final Alternatives • Alternative 1 • Convert entire 69 kV corridor from Eau Claire to Chippewa Falls to 161 kV • Convert all 69 kV load along corridor to 161 kV operation • Alternative 2 • Extend 161 kV from Presto Tap to Hallie Substation • Place US Rubber on loop from Eau Claire Substation • Place Chippewa Falls on loop from Wissota Substation

  15. Final Alternatives • Alternative 3 • Convert double-circuit 69 kV corridor to single-circuit 161 kV • Convert Hallie to 161 kV operation • Place US Rubber on loop from Eau Claire Substation

  16. Final Recommendation • Alternative 3 Recommended • Reterminate Wheaton to Presto Tap 161 kV line at Eau Claire Substation • Tear down existing 69 kV double-circuit line between Eau Claire and the point where line intersects with Hydro Lane – Red Cedar 161 kV line • Construct 161/69 kV substation (50th Avenue Substation) where double-circuit 69 kV line intersects Hydro Lane – Red Cedar 161 kV line • Construct single circuit 161 kV line from Eau Claire to 50th Avenue Substation • Convert Hallie Substation to 161 kV operation

  17. Final Recommendation

  18. Final Recommendation • Very robust service provided to area north of Eau Claire • Off-loading of Eau Claire 161/69 kV transformers buys approx. 12 years of life expectancy • Strong corridor to support Chippewa River generation • Increased Load-serving north of Jim Falls

  19. Next Steps • Funding requested for 2007 budget process • Continuing to investigate ways to off-load 69 kV network out of Eau Claire • Eau Claire Area Long-Term Study to be completed with DPC during Summer 2007

More Related