1 / 100

2011 Semi-Annual Assessor/Instructor Meeting June 25, 2011

2011 Semi-Annual Assessor/Instructor Meeting June 25, 2011. Assessor/Instructor Semi-Annual Meeting. Opening DCV Instructional Program DCV Assessment Program Instructor in-service presentations Assessor - Assessment Debrief SDI meeting SDA meeting

brendan-kemp
Télécharger la présentation

2011 Semi-Annual Assessor/Instructor Meeting June 25, 2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2011 Semi-Annual Assessor/Instructor Meeting June 25, 2011

  2. Assessor/Instructor Semi-Annual Meeting Opening DCV Instructional Program DCV Assessment Program Instructor in-service presentations Assessor - Assessment Debrief SDI meeting SDA meeting Instructor - Recert materials Assessor - 2011 POE Wrap up

  3. Assessor/Instructor Semi-Annual Meeting Opening DCV Instructional Program DCV Assessment Program Instructor in-service presentations Assessor - Assessment Debrief SDI meeting SDA meeting Instructor - Recert materials Assessor - 2011 POE Wrap up

  4. Assessor/Instructor Semi-Annual Meeting Opening DCV Instructional Program DCV Assessment Program Instructor in-service presentations Assessor - Assessment Debrief SDI meeting SDA meeting Instructor - Recert materials Assessor - 2011 POE Wrap up

  5. Year in Review - Instruction How did we do in 2010 -2011?

  6. Year in Review - InstructionClass Distribution

  7. Year in Review - InstructionStudent Distribution

  8. Year in Review - InstructionDCV Referee Count *About 3000 from previous year did not recertify.

  9. Year in Review - InstructionDCV Referee Count 12 7 9 8

  10. Year in Review - Instruction New Class Evaluation

  11. Year in Review - InstructionNew Clinic Class Evaluation • New Grade 8 Classes - What topics do you find most confusing? • Restarts - Goal kick, corner kick, kick off, PK, Free kicks - DFK and IFK • Offside • Local Modifications of the laws • Advantage • Substitution • Ball in play • Law 5, 6 - Hand signals; AR signals; AR flag meanings were a little confusing; Referee positioning; How to move on the field • Law 12; Just remembering which penalties you give for different infringements Law 12; Misconducts – issuing cards; What constitutes unsportsmanly behavior; Cautions vs sendoffs but acronym and matrix very helpful; Fouls dealing with goalkeeper

  12. Year in Review - InstructionNew Clinic Class Evaluation • New Grade 8 Classes - How to make the class more effective? • Class Management • Short classes 2-3 hours each, Maybe longer breaks • Let people write down more notes and slow down • Should have a class for players/coaches who are already familiar with the game; A little long for adults probably great for kids • Smaller classes • More explaining and less videos • As you work through the laws reference to the book more/pages, especially for the younger refs • Content • More practice quizzes; Study for test; more practice questions • Go over additional info not talked about on the test

  13. Year in Review - InstructionNew Clinic Class Evaluation • New Grade 8 Classes - How to make the class more effective? • Instructional Methods • More demonstration, Less lecturing; More AR Techniques • Add field module; Let us go outside and play a game; More time on the field showing how referees need to be positioned; More hands on practice; practice on field; A few practice games will be helpful • Get the students more into the conversation • Could make the entire course computer based • A sequence of teaching the rules more logically would help • Clinic Materials • Update the visual, need to ask yourself if the format is right for the facebook generation; Update the graphics and modernize the language. Most of the class was 13-16 years old; Up to date videos. • Make videos work on the slide show, The slides and accompanying videos are horrible, very inconsistent format, choppy and visually painful

  14. Year in Review - InstructionNew Clinic Class Evaluation • New Grade 12 Classes - What topics do you find most confusing? • DFK and IFK • Penalties of field players and goalkeepers • Ref training mixed with AR; Move through material covering head referee not AR more quickly; Focus on what and AR needs to know, Materials could have been organized and presented better; Too much info that was taught that was irrelevant to AR/STAR role; Too much coverage of referee responsibilities; Referee topics when you go very in depth • Offside • Laws vs rules (local modifications)

  15. Year in Review - InstructionNew Clinic Class Evaluation • New Grade 12 Classes - How can we make the class more effective? • Air conditioning and coffee • More videos • Limit questions from class; Stay focused • Sometimes the QA moved a little too quickly for us novices • Outside on field, Do it on a field, not in a classroom; More hands on • Manage time more efficiently, could have covered in 2-4 hours less • Specific positions of flag for AR • Took too much time on several elements that were for the head referee; Shorten it – focus on what AR’s really need to know, Restrict qa to AR questions

  16. Year in Review - Instruction Instructor Survey 57/89 took the survey – 64%

  17. Year in Review - InstructionInstructor Survey • State Director of Instruction solicited input from all Instructors in MDCVASRP in areas that required discussion by the State Referee Committee and decision • The SRC is continually looking to improve all programmatic areas • Team teaching is one area that received a lot of support • Flat rate instructor Pay by class and not by the number of students in a class • Allows better student to instructor ratio • Facilitates learning with smaller classes • Supports move to on field module more easily

  18. Year in Review - InstructionInstructor Survey • Class Size • 35 maximum – 27.6% • 35 is too big – 41.4% • 69% thinks it is max or too big

  19. Year in Review - InstructionInstructor Survey • Comments about class size - • I teach for a living and 15 - 20 is the ideal class size for two instructors. • It's the enthusiasm of the Instructor not class size that matters. I do find it despicable to NOT pay instructors for large classes. Our function is to teach as many referees as we can. Time will sort out those not committed. • The key variable is the age of the students, not class size. Too many 12 and 13-year olds and any class becomes a challenge

  20. Year in Review - InstructionInstructor Survey • Instructor Pay for New 8 with 35 Students • $350 – 46.6% • $250 – 24.1%

  21. Year in Review - InstructionInstructor Survey • Maximum Class Size • Never exceed 35 – 44.8% • Never exceed 25 – 34.5% • Class size to room capacity – 20.7% • 79.3% of Instructors believe that classes should have a cap to the enrollment.

  22. Year in Review - InstructionInstructor Survey • Teaching solo: • 8-hour class is taxing but manageable – 37.9% • 8-hour class needs an assistant – 25.9% • 8-hour class is ridiculous and should not happen – 17.2%

  23. Year in Review - InstructionInstructor Survey • It is a known fact that students learn better if they have different instructors...and 8 hours of teaching is very taxing for the instructor and the students. • Teaching a class with 30-40 properly registered adult students is a breeze. Managing a class of 35 teenagers is an entirely different story. Keeping them focused and engaged is a challenge and requires a variation in the messenger to help maintain focus. • I have always believed that team teaching is much more effective. It prevents mistakes and gives instructors opportunity to assess whether information is being absorbed.

  24. Year in Review - InstructionInstructor Survey • All clinic should have two instructors: • Agree – 41.4% • Decided by the SDA - 20.7% • Decided by lead instructor – 36.2% • Do not need more than one instructor - 1.7%

  25. Year in Review - InstructionInstructor Survey • Team Teaching: • Comfortable with any instructor that SDA assigns – 59.6% • Choose my own assistant instructor – 40.4%

  26. Year in Review - InstructionInstructor Survey On Clinic Reporting Procedure

  27. Year in Review - InstructionInstructor Survey On Getting Paid In a Timely Manner

  28. Year in Review - InstructionClinics Before USSF Online Registration • Pre-registration • In July and August before USSF online-registration email to the lead instructor. • In class • Announce certification is not complete until after they register online. • Do not collect checks or money in class. • At end of class, give each student who passes the class a pre-stamped envelop to write their name and address on it for mailing badges later. • Clinic report • When online registration is available, email all the students on the rosters and give them 2 weeks to register and pay online. • Once roster is complete, lead instructor will complete the clinic report. • Put a badge in each stamped and self addressed envelop and drop them in the mail.

  29. Year in Review - InstructionClinic Reporting Procedures After Online Registration • Registration • If the online system is available before or during the class, inform the students on the roster to register online before the end of the class. • Do not give out badges to students who fail to register online by the end of the class. • Clinic Reports • Complete the clinic report and check the "complete" box.

  30. Assessor/Instructor Semi-Annual Meeting Opening DCV Instructional Program DCV Assessment Program Instructor in-service presentations Assessor - Assessment Debrief SDI meeting SDA meeting Instructor - Recert materials Assessor - 2011 POE Wrap up

  31. Assessor/Instructor Semi-Annual Meeting Opening DCV Instructional Program DCV Assessment Program Instructor in-service presentations Assessor - Assessment Debrief SDI meeting SDA meeting Instructor - Recert materials Assessor - 2011 POE Wrap up

  32. Instructor In-Service Training Perception and Interpretation

  33. Instructor In-Service Training Say the WORD

  34. Instructor In-Service Training YELLOW BLACK ORANGE BLUE GREEN RED

  35. Instructor In-Service Training Say the WORD

  36. Instructor In-Service Training BLACK BLUE GREEN ORANGE RED YELLOW

  37. Instructor In-Service Training Say the COLOR

  38. Instructor In-Service Training

  39. Instructor In-Service Training Say the COLOR

  40. Instructor In-Service Training BLACK YELLOW ORANGE BLUE GREEN RED

  41. Instructor In-Service Training Say the COLOR

  42. Instructor In-Service Training BLACK YELLOW ORANGE BLUE GREEN RED

  43. Instructor In-Service Training Say the COLOR

  44. Instructor In-Service Training

  45. Instructor In-Service Training - Data collected from all six senses Hearing Smelling Touching Seeing Tasting Common (intuition) - Brain uses data to “make sense” from experience and use

  46. Instructor In-Service Training New Grade 8 Class Demographic Distribution >30= 20% <15 = 32% 19-30 = 8% 16-18 = 40%

  47. Instructor In-Service Training BOO all in play >30= 20% <15 = 32% n the field of play 19-30 = 8% 16-18 = 40% pponent

  48. Sharing Successes What Works Harvey Snyder, Ed.D. USSF Referee Instructor

  49. The Concepts • Engage students through action learning • Use their experiences • Avoid lectures • Vary your techniques • Challenge yourself to try something different

  50. Resources • Workbooks or handouts (Arlington Soccer pays!) • Masking tape • Small and large soccer balls • Nerf soccer balls • Coins • Laws of the Game and other USSF booklets • “Myths of the Game” • Soccer “Video Clips,” some from recerts • More senior members of the class

More Related