1 / 14

Chapter Outline

Chapter Outline. 17.1 Risk Shifting through Limited Liability Limited Liability as Insurance against Loss The Case of Parents and Subsidiaries Who Pays for the Implicit Insurance? The Moral Hazard Problem Why Have Limited Liability? Individual Shareholders

brian
Télécharger la présentation

Chapter Outline

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Chapter Outline 17.1 Risk Shifting through Limited Liability Limited Liability as Insurance against Loss The Case of Parents and Subsidiaries Who Pays for the Implicit Insurance? The Moral Hazard Problem Why Have Limited Liability? Individual Shareholders Limited Liability for Parent Corporations Exceptions to Limited Liability 17.2 Liability for Actions of Employees and Other Parties Vicarious Liability Doctrine Liability of Businesses for Actions of Independent Contractors

  2. Chapter Outline 17.3 Hold Harmless and Indemnity Agreements Effect on the Cost of Risk The Role of Insurance Summary of Incentive Effects 17.4 Claims Management and Administration General Claims Strategy Incentives to Settle Reputation Effects Effects of Multiple Suits Nuisance Suits and Fraud Releases and Advance Payments Lump Sum versus Structured Settlements Monitoring Performance of Insurers and Outside Contractors Claim Cost Allocation 17.5 Summary

  3. Limited Liability of Corporations • Definition of LL: • Shareholders _______ be held liable for claims against the corporation that exceed the corporation’s assets • I.e., shareholders’ liability is limited to their __________ interest

  4. LL as Insurance • Compared to a system with unlimited liability, LL provides shareholders with _________against losses that exceed corporate assets • Example: • Firm has assets = $10 million • Firm has no liabilities ==> equity value = $___ million • What if someone wins a tort judgement against the corporation for $12 million?

  5. LL as Insurance • Graphically, Loss to Shareholders $10 m Total tort liability claims $10 m

  6. LL as Insurance • Main Points: • LL allows risk shifting analogous to insurance • Potential ______________ bear the risk of losses in excess of the corporation’s assets

  7. Subsidiaries and LL • A parent corporation can organize so that it owns all the stock of other corporations (its subsidiaries) • Example: • This limits the liability of the ________ PARENT Subsidiary B Subsidiary A

  8. Illustration of How LL Reduces Risk for Parent • Assumptions: • Each subsidiary has $____ million in assets • Each subsidiary has a ______ probability of a $50 million tort claim • but both subsidiaries will not have claim Parent Loss Distribution (values in $millions) Limited Liability for Parent Unlimited Liability for Parent Probability: 0.98 (no claim) $0 $0 0.01 ($50 m claim against A) 25 50 0.01 ($50 m claim against B) 25 50 Expected Value 0.5 1.0 Standard Deviation 3.5 _____ Expected Value of Unpaid Claims ______ 0

  9. Who Pays for the Implicit Insurance Provided by LL? • Is the risk reduction from LL free? • Not when the party who bears the risk • is in a contractual relationship with the corporation • is informed • because they will demand ______ _________ before contracting

  10. LL and Moral Hazard • Since LL shifts some of risk to other parties, LL might induce corporations to take on too much risk • Problem is likely to be negligible for corporations with ____________assets

  11. Why Have LL? • Simple answer: • Positive effects of LL dominate the moral hazard (the negative effect) effect in most circumstances • Positive effects of LL for individual shareholders: • Facilitates separation of _____________ and risk bearing functions • Makes the risk associated with investment in firm not depend on the_________of other investors

  12. Why Have LL? • Positive effects of LL for parent corporations: • Encourages formation of various enterprises under one parent • To the extent that parents sometimes pay claims in ________ of a subsidiary’s assets LL can lower risk to other claimants • Synergies associated with combining entities are gained

  13. Piercing the Corporate Veil • Situations when courts do not uphold LL (pierce the corporate veil) • In a parent-individual shareholder situation: • Corporation is ________ held • Firm engages in obviously risky activities w/o ________ or significant assets

  14. Piercing the Corporate Veil • In a parent-subsidiary situation: • Parent has effective ________ of subsidiary • Sub engages in obviously risky activities with little capital • In both situations: • Benefits of separation of management and risk bearing are not present • _______ ________ problem is potentially severe

More Related