1 / 45

Multiple Contingency-Table Analysis

A. Philosophical Introduction We are now in position to begin dealing with cause and effect, that is, causality. Let's take a look at what we are saying and what we are NOT saying when we describe something as the cause (X) of some effect (Y): X ?? Y There is nothing mystical, metaphys

brielle
Télécharger la présentation

Multiple Contingency-Table Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

    1. Multiple Contingency-Table Analysis

    2. A. Philosophical Introduction We are now in position to begin dealing with cause and effect, that is, causality. Let's take a look at what we are saying and what we are NOT saying when we describe something as the cause (X) of some effect (Y): X ?? Y There is nothing mystical, metaphysical, or superhuman about this. We are simply playing a game, one with rules created by human beings.

    3. To label one variable the cause of another variable is nothing more than to have gathered the evidence required by these rules in order to impress other human beings that the labels "cause" and "effect" are being properly used. We have not ripped back the surface and exposed the gears and circuits that make the universe work. All we have done is satisfied the rules of the game sufficiently to be granted by others the right to use these labels. What are the rules? There are three of them.

    4. B. Criteria for Evaluating Causality The three criteria (rules) that you must demonstrate to be allowed to label some X the cause of some Y are: Covariation That is, the independent variable (X) and the dependent variable (Y) must covary (i.e., must NOT be statistically independent).

    5. Remember statistical independence? It can look like this, . . . ========================================== Years of Formal Annual Salary Education (in $1,000) (X) (Y) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 35 16 35 21 35 -------------------------------------------------------------------------

    6. . . . or it can look like this. (A constant cannot explain a variable.) ========================================== Years of Formal Annual Salary Education (in $1,000) (X) (Y) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 16 25 16 85 16 45 -------------------------------------------------------------------------

    7. Temporal priority The proposed cause (X) MUST precede in time the proposed effect (Y). X ? Y t1 t2 Nonspuriousness NO variables OTHER THAN the proposed cause (X) could have produced the proposed effect (Y).

    8. Before going any further, two qualifiers must be noted: ? Monocausalsounds like a search for THE ONE cause ? Deterministicseems to say that the presence of the cause GUARANTEES the production of the effect

More Related