1 / 25

PulseStar® Technologies and PulseSwitch Systems presentation to Association of Energy Engineers June 23, 2011

PulseStar® Technologies and PulseSwitch Systems presentation to Association of Energy Engineers June 23, 2011. Agenda Who We Are Energy Saving Imperative Fluorescent Lights vs HIDs vs LEDs Photopic and Scotopic Footcandles Energy Harvesting with Piezoelectric materials

brigid
Télécharger la présentation

PulseStar® Technologies and PulseSwitch Systems presentation to Association of Energy Engineers June 23, 2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PulseStar® Technologies and PulseSwitch Systemspresentation toAssociation of Energy Engineers June 23, 2011

  2. Agenda • Who We Are • Energy Saving Imperative • Fluorescent Lights vs HIDs vs LEDs • Photopic and Scotopic Footcandles • Energy Harvesting with Piezoelectric materials • LVDC – Emerging Market • PulseStar Products • Energy Saving Case Studies • Questions and Answers

  3. One of The Face® Companies Founded in Norfolk in 1867 Inventors of “F-Numbers” Face Floor Profile Numbers

  4. National Energy Saving Effort • Federal Tax Deductions - $.60 per sq ft for lighting • Require efficient lighting with bi-level controls • LEED level mandates • Many control options – Sophisticated computer controls, Automatic sensors, Manual controls • Many types of lamps

  5. HIDs vs Fluorescent vs LED • Truth vs Myth • Fact vs Perception

  6. Spectrally Enhanced Light • Concept developed by Dr. Berman • Adopted by DoE • Photopic readings not equivalent to Scotopic • Fluorescent light factor 1.69 • HPS factor .69 • Design to IESNA standard, understand SEL reality, use controls to achieve desired light levels in areas where you need it.

  7. Energy Harvesting • Energy derived from external sources • Many varieties • Renewable generation sources • Electromagnetic sensors • Piezoelectric Materials • Thunder/Lightning

  8. Low Voltage DC • NEMA sponsored symposium this year • Emerging market and demand • EMerge Alliance • DC Flex Zone • www.EMergeAlliance.com

  9. www.EMergeAlliance.com

  10. Our products: Batteryless/Wireless Controls High Efficiency Lighting Systems

  11. Lightning Switch Product Demonstrations

  12. PulseStar Lighting Systems Unique Multi-level Wireless Controls Save 45% to 83% Compared to MH & HPS Fixtures Feature 60,000 hr. T8 Lamps

  13. Targets High Bay Recreational Facilities - Hangars Equipment Maintenance Facilities Buildings Where MH & HPS Are Used & Where Floor Activities Are Non-Homogeneous

  14. Bishop Sullivan Catholic High School Gymnasium Light Retrofit • Replaced 400W Metal Halide with 4 Lamp T5 Linear Fluorescent • Lighting level controls on low provide better light than before • Zone controls enable additionally savings, for example leaving lights over the seats off during gym class • PulseStar Controls produced metered savings of 83%!

  15. Other Markets Parking Garages (With & Without Controls)

  16. Town Center Block IV Parking Garage Lighting Upgrade partially complete • Improved Safety by raising light levels • Highly efficient linear fluorescent lighting system saved electricity • Maintenance costs reduced with long life T8 lamps

  17. Joint Base Langley Eustis – Eustis PX Parking Lot Light Savings • Enable personnel to dim PX parking lot lights after hours during periods of inactivity; • Ensure safe lighting levels are provided during required hours; • Reduce electricity usage on those eight poles by 57%; and • More than pay for itself in 12 to 15 months of operation.

  18. U.S. Army Has Studied PulseStar Since Late 2009 Pilot Projects with Multiple Installations Funded & About to Begin

  19. Army Study Found: PulseStar Systems with Controls Cost 15% More PulseStar Systems with Controls Save 56% More

  20. Products Are Patented & Patents Pending Fixtures & Components Are UL Listed or Inherently Safe

  21. PulseStar® Technologies and PulseSwitch Systemspresentation toVirginia Beach Joint Energy Committee June 2, 2011

More Related