1 / 19

ORGANISATIONAL CULTURE

ORGANISATIONAL CULTURE. MEASUREMENT AND IMPLICATIONS Eileen Henderson eileen.henderson@xtra.co.nz. Today’s Presentation. Why go back to study? A culture questionnaire - OCP Use of multivariate statistics - SEM Test of the factor structure of the OCP - failed!

brody
Télécharger la présentation

ORGANISATIONAL CULTURE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ORGANISATIONAL CULTURE MEASUREMENT AND IMPLICATIONS Eileen Henderson eileen.henderson@xtra.co.nz HENDERSON WHITE ASSOCIATES 8 June 2004

  2. Today’s Presentation • Why go back to study? • A culture questionnaire - OCP • Use of multivariate statistics - SEM • Test of the factor structure of the OCP - failed! • Development of new measurement model • Test of the predictive relationships between • Culture vs Organisational Commitment • Culture vs Job Satisfaction • Implications HENDERSON WHITE ASSOCIATES 8 June 2004

  3. 10 OCP Dimensions • Leadership: Role of leaders in directing organisation, maintaining its culture and serving as role models • Planning: Extent to which the organisation has clear goals; plans to meet the goals, and strives to follow the plans • Communication: Free sharing of information among all levels within the organisation • Humanistic: Extent to which the organisation respects and cares for individuals; the people end of task vs people • Job Performance: Degree to which the organisation emphasises task performance HENDERSON WHITE ASSOCIATES 8 June 2004

  4. Environment: Extent to which the organisation is responsive to client needs and is influenced by/ influences the action of similar organisations • Individual Development: Extent to which the organisation provides members with opportunities to develop their skills; rewards development with career advancement and challenging work • Innovation: Willingness of the organisation to take risks and encourage innovation and creativity HENDERSON WHITE ASSOCIATES 8 June 2004

  5. Socialisation of Entry: Time new members take to settle in and feel they understand the organisation; the effectiveness of any formal induction process • Structure: Degree to which structure limits the action of its members; the influence of its policies and procedures on behaviours; the concentration of power HENDERSON WHITE ASSOCIATES 8 June 2004

  6. Factors of OCP Leadership Environment Planning Individual development Communication Innovation Humanistic Socialisation of Entry Job Performance Structure HENDERSON WHITE ASSOCIATES 8 June 2004

  7. Factors From Literature Detert et al 2000 8 Cultural DimensionsOCP Dimension(s)No. Ref’s Basis of truth and rationalityLeadership10 Nature of time/Time horizon Planning 7 Motivation Communication 9 Humanistic Stability vs Change/Innovation Innovation 17 Individual Dev Orientation to work, Task Job Performance 12 Isolation vs Collaboration -------- 17 Control, Co-ordination Structure 13 Focus – Internal/External Environment 11 HENDERSON WHITE ASSOCIATES 8 June 2004

  8. Instruments 158 Survey Questions from: • The Broadfoot and Ashkanasy 50 Organizational Culture Profile (OCP) • A commitment questionnaire 15 • A job satisfaction survey 36 • Individualism/Collectivism 16 • Two social desirability scales 36 HENDERSON WHITE ASSOCIATES 8 June 2004

  9. Sample Demographics • Mean age 43.3 years • Mean time in this job 16.3 years • Mean time in this hospital 6.1 years HENDERSON WHITE ASSOCIATES 8 June 2004

  10. Correlations -10-Factor Model Variable 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1. Leadership -- 2. Planning .71** -- 3. Comms .68** .60** -- 4. Hum .65** .58** .76** -- 5. Indiv Dev .64** .58** .68** .64** -- 6. Structure -.18** -.25** -.37** -.30** -.28** -- 7. Job Perform .68** .64** .57** .57** .56** -.19** -- 8. Environmt .66** .59** .56** .50** .47** -.20** .55** -- 9. Innovation .59** .61** .65** .69** .60** -.32** .57** .50** -- 10. Soc of E .31** .41** .34** .37** .42** -.31** .38** .28** .45** 11. Comtmnt .54** .57** .54** .61** .59** -.23** .49** .49** .55** HENDERSON WHITE ASSOCIATES 8 June 2004

  11. 10 FactorModel HENDERSON WHITE ASSOCIATES 8 June 2004

  12. 7 FactorModel HENDERSON WHITE ASSOCIATES 8 June 2004

  13. Outcome variable/s Individualism Collectivism HumS LeadS Plan Soc of Entry In Dev Innov Struct SDE IM Measurement Model HENDERSON WHITE ASSOCIATES 8 June 2004

  14. Commitment • Strong belief in and acceptance of organisation’s goals • A willingness to exert considerable effort on behalf of the organisation • Desire to maintain membership of the organisation Mowday, Steers & Porter, 1979 HENDERSON WHITE ASSOCIATES 8 June 2004

  15. Culture vs Commitment Individualism -.320 SDE .294 Soc of Entry .365 Collectivism .151 Commitment .630 In Dev HENDERSON WHITE ASSOCIATES 8 June 2004

  16. Job Satisfaction FacetSatisfaction with • Extrinsic Rewards Pay, pay rises, other rewards • Supervision Immediate supervisor • Nature of work Type of work, tasks, pride meaningful • Op conditions Rules, procedures, red tape • Promotion Opportunities HENDERSON WHITE ASSOCIATES 8 June 2004

  17. EXR Soc of Entry SDE .358 .299 1.389 Collectivism .213 NoW .862 .995 PROM In Dev .881 Innov Job Satisfaction - Positive HENDERSON WHITE ASSOCIATES 8 June 2004

  18. -.764 Struct OpC -.690 -.588 Individualism -.320 -.974 -.532 EXR Soc of Entry -.213 SDE NoW -1.405 -1.988 HumS Job Satisfaction - Negative HENDERSON WHITE ASSOCIATES 8 June 2004

  19. Summary The importance of • growing and developing people • teamwork • socialisation process • managing expectations The changing nature of the psychological contract HENDERSON WHITE ASSOCIATES 8 June 2004

More Related