1 / 26

Transportation Options in Small Communities: Lessons for Portage la Prairie

Transportation Options in Small Communities: Lessons for Portage la Prairie. Richard Milgrom Associate Professor Department of City Planning University of Manitoba. Deepa Chandran Masters Student Department of City Planning University of Manitoba. Presentation overview.

brouwer
Télécharger la présentation

Transportation Options in Small Communities: Lessons for Portage la Prairie

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Transportation Options in Small Communities: Lessons for Portage la Prairie Richard Milgrom Associate Professor Department of City Planning University of Manitoba Deepa Chandran Masters Student Department of City Planning University of Manitoba

  2. Presentation overview • Transportation constraints in small towns • Successful transportation strategies in small towns • Portage la Prairie today • Transportation suggestions: Portage la Prairie Age Friendly Study, 2015 • Options for funding and technical support • Next steps: Beginning for change

  3. Transportation in small towns Funding constraints Limited demand Organizational capacity constraints Limited public transportation options Auto-centric built form and development Social Issues Ecological Issues Economic Issues

  4. Impacts of poor transportation options • High individual transportation expenses • Auto-oriented built form and high level of pollution • Reduced options for social exchange • Discourages seniors to age in place • Forces young people to move to larger cities • Transportation exclusion • Poor accessibility to social infrastructure and basic amenities • Lower levels of community wellbeing

  5. SUCCESSFUL TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIES IN SMALL TOWNS

  6. Investing and encouraging active transportation • Cheap and beneficial in small cities • Collaborative programs with schools, employers and non-profit organizations • Investment required in on-road, off-road and way-finding facilities • Examples: City of Whitehorse YK, Fernie in BC and Township of Minton Hills, ON • However, health, age, weather factors may prevent many from using this option Bike to work program in Fernie, BC

  7. Demand-responsive options • The customer has to make call for the service • Highly flexible but costly • Dial-a-ride and HandyVan are widely used • Handy-Dart service for customers with disabilities (BC) Pioneer Valley para-transit service for disabled, Massachusetts

  8. Carshare • Convenient and cheap • Benefits those who cannot /do not want to buy a car • Reduces unnecessary travel • Carshare co-op in Kootenay benefits several communities such as Nelson, Revelstoke, Kimberley and Rossland. A group of people owning the same car in Kootenay region

  9. Carpooling • Reduces travel cost and is environmental friendly • Easy if all members have the same destination and origin • Local bodies can support by providing ride matching services • Successful in many BC communities such as Vernon, Nelson and Kelowna. Carpooling advertisement in Vernon, BC

  10. Enhanced Taxi-Pass program • Subsidized taxi tickets • Benefits seniors, students, disabled and low income households • Mainly based on Municipal subsidies • Successful in communities like Peace River, AB A senior using a free taxi ride in Chilliwack, BC

  11. Transportation Information and Reimbursement Program (TRIP) • Entirely free travel option for seniors and disabled • Customer avails help of friend/neighbor to reach destinations and gives back the reimbursed money • Partnership between non-profit organization and City • Successful in several small US communities (e.g.: Riverside, California) A senior member covered under TRIP in Riverside, California

  12. Taxi-bus (People travel in the same taxi) • Routes may be fixed or flexible • Cheaper than taxi service • Useful for those who are settled away from the downtown • Successful in several small communities in QC such as Rimouski A taxi-bus in Rimouski, Quebec

  13. Collaboration with school bus operators • School bus used as public transit during the school hours • Besides, adults/disabled people get ride if seats are empty (ride with students) • Though sounds utopian, several communities in QC benefits from this option • Terrace Trail and Fort St. John are successful examples

  14. Provincial and inter-municipal partnerships • Service shared by several neighbouring small communities • Small communities also purchase transit service from existing transit systems in the neighbouring areas • Cost shared by different administrative divisions • King County transit in NS, and Whistler Valley transit in BC are successful examples A WAVE bus in BC

  15. Handivan/Minibus service as transit • Cheaper than conventional bus service • Fixed routes and schedule • Cheaper than the shuttles or taxis • Can be replaced by bus with increase in demand • Successful in communities like Hinton in AB and Wasaga Beach in ON. A Handibus used for transit in Wasaga Beach

  16. Conventional bus service • Requires detailed planning • High initial investment (with provincial support) • Usually 60%-70% of the cost goes as subsidy • There is no threshold population required to check the success or need for transit (1 bus on service and 1 spare) • Collingwood, ON is a good example Collingwood transit, Ontario

  17. Options to reduce travel needs • Telecommuting: (working from home) • Online shopping However, has much less impact as compared to previous options

  18. Portage la Prairie today • Fifth largest urban centre in the province • High share of seniors (senior population will drastically increase in the near future) • Numerous commendable age-friendly initiatives • Automobile centric development • Other transportation facilities - Handivan - Portage Voluntary Driving Program for seniors - Very limited active transportation infrastructure

  19. Transportation Options : Portage la Prairie Age-friendly Report, 2015 • Enhanced Taxi-Pass (funding by city) • Transportation Reimbursement and Information Program (Funding by City (roughly 60% in Riverside), donations and other organizations) • Conventional transit (vehicle procurement using Federal/Provincial funds, operation by City/ through contract)

  20. Bus Route Options Phase-I Phase-II • Service in 35-40 minutes • Length- 15km (Phase-I), 14.6 KM (Phase-II) • Options for bus-shelters and benches at selected bus stops

  21. How costly is a conventional bus service? Source: Transit Implementation Guidelines for Small Canadian Municipalities, 2006) • A town with 10,000 tax payers will have to pay an extra $15-$20 in an year to maintain regular transit service • A transit system with six day bus service (3,333 hours per year), and 25% cost recovery will cost approximately $15 annually per resident of Portage la Prairie.

  22. Selkirk Transit: A Successful Precedent from Manitoba • Population- 9800 (2011) • Transit service started in 2011 • Operating cost - $95000 (City) + $95000 (Province) • Vehicle procurement + additional expenses: Federal Gas Tax money and Public Transit Trust • Per capita cost of transit service- $10 • Ticket cost: $2 (for all except children) Transit in Selkirk

  23. Transit: Options for funding and technical support • Green Municipal Fund (Federal) • Federal Gas Tax Fund (GTF) • Building Canada Fund (BCF) • Public-Private Partnership (P3) Fund • Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) • Collaboration of Municipality with local business, non-profit and other organizations

  24. Next steps: A beginning for change • Shift from conventional ‘economic bottom line’ approach to ‘triple bottom line’ approach in transportation planning. • Frame a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategy -Understand why, where, when and who travel -Encourage people to choose and make people aware of the need .. to have sustainable travelling options including a new transit system -Requires collaboration with various institutions

  25. “A bus represents democracy in action” (Enrique Penalosa, 2013)

  26. THANK YOU

More Related