1 / 32

Towards a New Routing Framework in MANETs Task 3: Theory of Scalable and Robust Protocols

Towards a New Routing Framework in MANETs Task 3: Theory of Scalable and Robust Protocols. Marcelo Carvalho, Hari Rangarajan, Marco Spohn, Ravindra Vaishampayan, Rolando Menchaca, Zhenjiang Li J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves. University of California, Santa Cruz jj@soe.ucsc.edu.

bruis
Télécharger la présentation

Towards a New Routing Framework in MANETs Task 3: Theory of Scalable and Robust Protocols

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Towards a New Routing Framework in MANETsTask 3: Theory of Scalable and Robust Protocols Marcelo Carvalho, Hari Rangarajan, Marco Spohn, Ravindra Vaishampayan, Rolando Menchaca, Zhenjiang Li J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves University of California, Santa Cruz jj@soe.ucsc.edu http://www.cse.ucsc.edu/research/ccrg/home.html

  2. Outline • Summary of results obtained over the past year • Analytical models, routing, multicasting • Recent results on ordering in distributed algorithms • Plan for the next year.

  3. Summary of Results: Analytical Models of MAC Protocols • First analytical model of IEEE 802.11 DCF that considers directional antennas or space time block codes (STBC) operating in a multihop MANET taking into account the characteristics of PHY layer in detail. • Effective SINR of the Alamouti scheme under multiple access interference (MAI). • A new Markov model for the operation of the IEEE 802.11DCF that includes: (a) the impact of the carrier-sensing activity, (b) the finite-retry limit of frame retransmissions, and (c) the impact of errors in both control and data frames within a four-way handshake. • M. Carvalho, "Analytical Modeling of Medium Access Control Protocols in Wireless Networks," PhD Thesis, Computer Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, March 2006. • M. Carvalho and J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, ``Modeling Wireless Ad Hoc Networks with Directional Antennas,'' Proc. IEEE Infocom 2006, Barcelona, Spain, 23--29 April, 2006. • M. Carvalho and J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, ``Analytical Modeling of Ad Hoc Networks that Utilize Space-Time Coding,'' Proc. IEEE WiOpt 2006: 4th Intl. Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc, and Wireless Networks, Boston, Massachusetts, April 3--7, 2006.

  4. Summary of Results: Distributed QoS Routing in MANETs • First distributed algorithms for QoS routing with multiple constraints that only require local information to operate. • MPOR (multi-constrained path optimization routing) algorithm supports (a) multi-constrained path selection (finding feasible paths satisfying constraints) and (b) multi-constrained path optimization (obtaining feasible paths that are optimal w.r.t. optimization metric. • Key ideas: • Define “logical distance” computed by an optimization function that is monotone and isotone. • Compute a k-optimal path set (the first k shortest paths w.r.t. logical distance) for each destination using ordering invariants. • Z. Li and J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, ``Finding Multi-Constrained Feasible Paths by Using Depth-First Search,'' accepted for publication in ACM WINET Journal, 2005. • Z. Li and J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, ''A Distributed Approach for Multi-Constrained Path Selection and Routing Optimization'', Proc. QShine 06: Third International Conference on Quality of Service in Heterogeneous Wired/Wireless Networks, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, August 7-9, 2006.

  5. Summary of Results: Multicast Routing in MANETs • Robustness through learning and and cross-layer designs for mesh-based multicast routing in MANETs • Incorporation of directional antennas in mesh-bsed multicasting. • Ravindra Vaishampayan, "Efficient and Robust Multicast Routing in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks," PhD Thesis, Computer Science, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, March 2006. • R. Vaishampayan and J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, ``An Adaptive Redundancy Protocol for Mesh Based Multicasting,'' accepted for publication in Computer Communications Journal, special issue on Advances in Computer Communication Networks, 2006. • R. Vaishampayan and J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, ``Cross Layer Ad hoc Multiple Channel Multicasting Protocol,'' Proc. IEEE MASS 2006, Vancouver, Canada, October 9--12, 2006. • R. Menchaca-Mendez, R. Menchaca-Mendez and J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, "ADMP: An Adaptive Multicast Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks," Proc. 19th IFIP World Computer Congress, Santiago, Chile,August 20--25, 2006. • R. Vaishampayan and J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, ``Efficient Multicasting in Multi-Hop Ad Hoc Networks Using Directional Antennas,'' Proc. IEEE MASS 2005: 2nd IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Systems, 7--10 November 2005, Washington, D.C.

  6. Summary of Results: Dominating Sets in MANETs • The first distributed algorithm that solves the (k, r) domination problem in arbitrary graphs and MANETs using only local information: • Each node is covered by k dominating nodes that are at most r hops away. • Applicable to many problems in protocol design for multicasting, broadcasting and topology control. • Marco A. Spohn, "Domination in Graphs in the Context of Mobile Ad Hoc Networks," PhD Thesis, Computer Science, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, 2005 • M.A. Spohn and J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, ``Bounded-Distance Multi-Clusterhead Formation in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks,'' Ad Hoc Networks Journal, accepted for publication, 2006. • M.A. Spohn and J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, ``Multicasting in Ad Hoc Networks in the Context of Multiple Channels and Multiple Interfaces,'' Proc. International Workshop on Localized Communication and Topology Protocols for Ad hoc Networks (LOCAN 2005) 7 November 2005, Washington, D.C.

  7. Summary of Results: Secure and Robust Routing in MANETs • The first secure routing algorithm for MANETs based on self-certifying keys. • Enables secure routing in disrupted networks; no need for connectivity to a certifying authority once the network is deployed. • Z. Li and J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, ``Non-Interactive Key Establishment in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks,'' accepted for publication in Ad Hoc Networks, 2006. • Z. Li and J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, `` New Non-Interactive Key Agreement and Progression (NIKAP) Protocols and Their Applications to Security in Ad Hoc Networks,'' Proc. International workshop on Wireless and Sensor Networks Security (WSNS'05), 7 November 2005, Washington, D.C.

  8. Summary of Results: Distributed Ordering in MANETs • The first on-demand routing algorithm for MANETs based only on source-based sequence numbers. • Much better performance and much simpler than AODV, DSR, and variations on destination-based sequence numbers or path caching. • Proof that routing framework based on distributed ordering sequences is feasible. • Hari Rangarajan, "Robust Loop-free On-demand Routing in Ad hoc Networks," PhD Thesis, Computer Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, June 2006. • H. Rangarajan and J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, ``Efficient Use of Route Requests for Loop-free On-demand Routing in Ad hoc Networks,'’ accepted for publication in Computer Networks, Elsevier, 2006. • H. Rangarajan and J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, ``On-demand Loop-Free Routing in Ad hoc Networks Using Source Sequence Numbers,'' Proc. IEEE MASS 2005: 2nd IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Systems, 7--10 November 2005, Washington, D.C. Best Paper Award

  9. Distributed Ordering Using Source Sequence Numbers Motivation: • All on-demand routing protocols require unique identifiers for RREQs, all dissemination protocols require unique IDs for packets being disseminated. • All on-demand routing schemes to date have used additional mechanisms to ensure loop freedom (e.g., AODV uses destination sequence-numbers, DSR uses source-routes). • We have to identify RREQs and disseminated packets! • Can we realize routing protocols and dissemination protocols that maintain ordering solely on the basis of the sequence numbers already used to identify RREQs or similar messages? • Does the new approach attain the desired simplicity with the same or better performance than previous schemes?

  10. Distributed Ordering Using Source Sequence Numbers Approach: • Use the source sequence labels (SSL) needed in RREQs to build destination-based directed acyclic graphs (DAG). • Since multiple DAGs can be created, each node remembers the DAG in which it participates, and its neighbors inform it of the DAG in which they collaborated. • Ensure that no node can “jump back” to a prior DAG, which can create loops. • A node can change its relative order by changing DAGs • Nodes use an SSL and a reported sequence label (RSL) to uniquely identify a DAG in the presence of topology changes. • RSL is used to avoid joining the wrong DAGs • SSL is used together with RSL for ordering within a DAG to enable local repairs • Enable local repairs based on the ordering of nodes within a DAG. • Many strategies are possible. • We have only explored the simplest ones.

  11. A SSL (C,2) RSL (A,2) SSL (C,2) RSL (A,2) SSL (C,2) RSL (F,2) SSL (C,2) RSL (F,2) F G B SSL (C,2) RSL (G,1) SSL (C,2) RSL (G,1) SSL (A,1) RSL (B,1) SSL (A,1) RSL (B,1) SSL (A,1) RSL (A,1) C SSL (C,2) RSL (C,2) SSL (C,2) RSL (C,2) X SSL (A,1) RSL (C,1) D SSL (A,1) RSL (A,1) SSL (A,1) RSL (A,1) SSL (C,2) RSL (A,2) 1 2 Loop-freedom when Destination Replies (DLSR) A RREQ 1 RREP 1 F G RREQ 2 B RREP 2 C X D Node A cannot accept RREP from B, Because it belongs to an invalid DAG Node A can only accept RREPs in DAG 2, or become part of a new DAG.  Valid DAG at Node A:

  12. Intermediate node replies in AODV SN: 1 SN: 1 SN: 1 X Y Z S D A B C SN: 1 SN: 1 SN: 1 SN: 2 SN: 1 Only a node with SN > 1 can answer source S’s RREQ. All RREQs will have to be answered by the destination.

  13. SSDL: [(A,1), inf) A SSL (A,2) RSL (A,2) A SSDL: [(A,2),2) P P SSDL: [(A,1),2) B B SSL (A,2) RSL (P,1) Q Q SSDL: [(A,1),1) SSDL: [(A,2),1) C C SSL (A,2) RSL (Q,1) D D [(A,2), 1)] is fresher than [(A,2), 2) is fresher than [(A,1), inf] Distances as Labels for Local Repairs (LSR-D) A SSDL: [(A,1), inf ) SSL (A,1) RSL (A,1) B SSDL: [(A,1),2) SSL (A,1) RSL (B,1)] SSDL: [(A,1),1) C SSL (A,1) RSL (C,1)] D [(A,1), 1)] is fresher than [(A,1), 2) is fresher than [(A,1), inf] We can use source-sequence numbers instead of destination-sequence numbers to identify fresh distances

  14. Performance Summary * Standard test scenarios

  15. Packet Delivery Ratio 30-random flows, 100 nodes SSL-based Protocols AODV, DSR, OLSR

  16. Control Overhead 30-random flows, 100 nodes AODV SSL-based protocols, OLSR DSR: Drops data packets

  17. Delivery Latency 30-random flows, 100 nodes DSR,OLSR AODV SSL-based protocols

  18. Implications • We have shown that distributed ordering of nodes in dynamic networks is possible using SSLs (same information needed to disseminate packets w/o replications). • Performance results show that this new way or ordering nodes renders protocols that are simpler (in logic) and out-perform the current state-of-the-art MANET routing protocols in terms of packet delivery, delivery latency, and control overhead. • Protocols for any type of routing and dissemination (proactive and on-demand unicast, multicast, dissemination, publish-subscribe, etc.) can be cast as a problem of distributed ordering in graphs. • So, we have the start of a new framework for routing in dynamic networks.

  19. Next Steps • Develop a unified framework for routing in MANETs centered around “distributed ordering of sequences” • Integrate routing and scheduling using the notion of ordering in a neighborhood and ordering in the network. • Limit signaling overhead incurred in informing nodes about interest in certain destinations or the presence of such destinations while nodes move.

  20. Distributed Ordering in Routing MAX ordering sequence (2) i (3) (4) u g R (5) k f (1) (2) h p j e (3) MIN (0) (4) m RREQ, Update, Subscription, Interest c d (1) v b R (3) (5) (3) (2) (4) a Nodes are ordered for each destination, which can be a node, a service, content or a role. Ordering is maintained as nodes move around carrying content. Ordering of nodes forms a directed acyclic graph (DAG) independently of any routing metric used

  21. Distributed Ordering in Routing MAX ordering sequence (2) i (3) (4) u g R (5) k f (1) (2) h p j e (3) MIN (0) (4) m RREQ, Update, Subscription, Interest c d (1) v b R (3) (5) (3) (2) (4) a Load balancing and constraints (e.g., end-to-end delay and jitter) used for forwarding over DAG. Constraints can be made part of the ordering

  22. Different than Virtual Circuits! i (3) (4) x g R (5) source k f h p j e (3) (4) m c d y (3) b R (5) (3) (2) (4) a Nodes b, h, and x can reply to the request (for route, content, service) from p, rather than just d (destination, origin of content or service). Each node has multiple paths to reach destination while satisfying the given constraints.

  23. Proactive Routing: Too many nodes are forced to know about how to reach each destination! Does not work well with random partitions Path first, then data forwarding c f D D h e a S Information about D propagates away from D in a circle of radius r b

  24. On-Demand Routing: Too many nodes are forced to help find or repair ways to reach a few destinations! (RREQ flooding). Does not work with partitioned networks! Path first, then data forwarding Nodes with paths to D reply to S. Information from S propagates away from S in a circle of radius r c f D h e a S S Too few nodes keep state for D. So too many nodes try to fix broken paths b

  25. Epidemic Routing Too many nodes are forced to relay data from S to D. Does not work with partitioned networks, unless infinite storage is assumed. Data create paths Information from S propagates away from S in a circle of radius r c f D h e a S S b

  26. Goal Limit the number of nodes that incur signaling and forwarding overhead between S and D c f Region of interest is a function of the source and destination D h e a S b

  27. Goal Limit the number of nodes that incur signaling and forwarding overhead between S and D c f Conjecture: Use elipitic curves defined by the distances to source and destination D D h e a S S b

  28. f Goals Enable Correct Signaling and Forwarding in Partitioned Networks. Preserve efficiency in each network component D e h S

  29. J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves (PI) Hamid Sadjadpour Katia Obraczka Muriel Medard Andrea Goldsmith Pravin Varaiya Rajive Bagrodia Mario Gerla Jennifer Hou Nitin Vaidya Tony Ephremides UCSC: MIT: Stanford University: UC Berkeley: UCLA: UIUC: University of Maryland: http://www.soe.ucsc.edu/research/ccrg/DAWN

  30. Summary of Scientific Progress • 19 journal papers published or accepted for publication. • ACM WINET, ACM/IEEE Trans. Networking, IEEE Trans. Comm., IEEE Trans. Wireless Comm., ACM Trans. Sensor Networks, Computer Communications, Ad Hoc Networks • 35 peer-reviewed papers in conference proceedings • ACM Mobicom, ACM Mobihoc, ACM SIGCOMM, IEEE Infocom, IEEE WiOpt, IEEE MASS, IEEE Qshine, IEEE ICC, IEEE IPSN • One Best Paper Award (IEEE MASS 2005) • 8 Invited papers • 12 manuscripts • 13 Ph.D. theses completed, at least 2 graduates with faculty positions • Active and growing intercampus collaboration (e.g., UCLA-MIT, UCLA-UCSC, Stanford-MIT)

  31. Summary of Scientific Progress (2) • More accurate treatments of the effects of the physical layer in the protocol stack • First analytical models that accurately reflect the impact of node mobility in links and paths • New approaches on how MAI should be treated • New modeling tools for the characterization of energy consumption in MANETs • New performance trade-offs involving node complexity, node mobility, packet length, channel utilization, and delay. • First results on network coding applied to unicasting and multicasting in MANETs • The first algorithm for on-demand routing that operates solely with source-originated sequence numbers • New approaches to information dissemination • New optimization techniques for large-scale simulations

More Related