1 / 29

Emmanuele Ravaioli LHC-CM Thanks to Hugues Thiesen, Guy Deferne, Christian Giloux,

Frequency Transfer Function of a dipole What is it Why is it important How to calculate it How to model it How to measure it. Emmanuele Ravaioli LHC-CM Thanks to Hugues Thiesen, Guy Deferne, Christian Giloux, Bernard Dubois, Emmanuel Garde , Miguel Cerqueira Bastos 11-11-2011.

bsutton
Télécharger la présentation

Emmanuele Ravaioli LHC-CM Thanks to Hugues Thiesen, Guy Deferne, Christian Giloux,

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Frequency Transfer Functionof a dipoleWhat is itWhy is it importantHow to calculate it How to model itHow to measure it Emmanuele Ravaioli LHC-CM Thanks to Hugues Thiesen, Guy Deferne, Christian Giloux, Bernard Dubois, Emmanuel Garde, Miguel Cerqueira Bastos 11-11-2011

  2. Simulation of the electrical behavior of the LHC dipole circuits • Model of a dipole • Frequency Transfer Function • Measurements in SM18: Set-up and results • Comments on the results… • Conclusions & Further Work Frequency Transfer Function of a dipole Emmanuele Ravaioli LHC-CM 11-11-2011

  3. Simulation of the electrical behavior of the LHC dipole circuits • For more info: • TE-Magnet-Seminary - Circuit simulations of the main LHC dipoles and the case of the 'unbalanced' dipoles – Ravaioli • 5JO-3_Ravaioli_20110916 • Modeling of the voltage waves in the LHC main dipole circuits Emmanuele Ravaioli LHC-CM 11-11-2011

  4. L = Laperture = 49 mH C = Cground = 150 nF Rp = Rparallel = 100 Ω Cp = 1 pF (for the moment) k = 0.75 7 Ω < R1,2 < 10 Ω Model of a dipole Inhomogeneous AC behavior of the two apertures of the dipole Different frequency response Phase-velocity of the wave changing along the dipole chain Each aperture shifts the wave of a different angle Eddy Currents in the coils Magnetization Effects Parasitic Coil-to-Ground Capacitance Parasitic Turn-to-Turn Capacitance • For more info: • 5JO-3_Ravaioli_20110916 • Modeling of the voltage waves in the LHC main dipole circuits Emmanuele Ravaioli LHC-CM 11-11-2011

  5. Frequency Transfer Function Example: L = 2*Laperture = 98 mH C = 2*Cground = 300 nF R = Rparallel = 100 Ω Matlab application for the study of the parameters of the proposed model of a dipole aperture Impedance of a stand-alone aperture model: (C/2) // [ (1-k)*L + (k*L // R) ] (second Z/2 bypassed by a short-circuit) Impedance of a series of aperture models: (Cp, Rp ignored here for simplicity) (C/2) // ∑Nmodules { [ (1-k)*L + (k*L // R) ] + C // [ (1-k)*L + (k*L // R) ] } Emmanuele Ravaioli LHC-CM 11-11-2011

  6. Measurements in SM18: Set-up • Two power converters in parallel, one providing the current level I_max and the other one providing a sinusoidal oscillation of ±4 V at a frequency sweeping between 30 and 2 kHz. • The gain-phase analyzer measures two differential voltages: one coming directly from the voltage taps of the dipole (Umag) and one proportional to the current flowing through the DCCT, ie through the dipole (Imag); this latter signal is acquired through an AC coupled differential amplifier with a gain of 1000. • Test without current (only Gain-Phase Analyzer and dipole, no PCs; frequency range: 1-20 kHz) • Tests at different I_max: 0 A ; 50 A ; 1 kA ; 2 kA ; 3 kA ; 4 kA ; 5 kA ; 6 kA . • Tests at different dI/dt(varying current): 0 A/s ; ±10 A/s ; 20 A/s ; 30 A/s ; 40 A/s ; ±50 A/s . • Tests measuring two separate apertures. • Tests measuring four separate poles. • Test after disconnecting Rparallel. Emmanuele Ravaioli LHC-CM 11-11-2011

  7. Imax = 0* dI/dt = 0 A/s Magnet * Without Power Converters Measurements in SM18: Results No PCs – Impedance Emmanuele Ravaioli LHC-CM 11-11-2011

  8. Imax = 0* dI/dt = 0 A/s Magnet * Without Power Converters Measurements in SM18: Results Different Imax – Phase Emmanuele Ravaioli LHC-CM 11-11-2011

  9. Imax = 0*, 50, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000, 6000 A dI/dt = 0 A/s Magnet * Without Power Converters Measurements in SM18: Results Different Imax – Impedance Emmanuele Ravaioli LHC-CM 11-11-2011

  10. Imax = 0*, 50, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000, 6000 A dI/dt = 0 A/s Magnet * Without Power Converters Measurements in SM18: Results Different Imax – Phase Emmanuele Ravaioli LHC-CM 11-11-2011

  11. Imax = 50, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000, 6000 A dI/dt = 10 A/s Magnet Measurements in SM18: Results Different Imax – Impedance Emmanuele Ravaioli LHC-CM 11-11-2011

  12. Imax = 50, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000, 6000 A dI/dt = 10 A/s Magnet Measurements in SM18: Results Different Imax – Phase Emmanuele Ravaioli LHC-CM 11-11-2011

  13. Imax = 50, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000, 6000 A dI/dt = -10 A/s Magnet Measurements in SM18: Results Different Imax – Impedance Emmanuele Ravaioli LHC-CM 11-11-2011

  14. Imax = 50, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000, 6000 A dI/dt = -10 A/s Magnet Measurements in SM18: Results Different Imax – Phase Emmanuele Ravaioli LHC-CM 11-11-2011

  15. dI/dt = 0, ±10, 20, 30, 40, ±50 A/s Imax > 50 Magnet Measurements in SM18: Results Different Imax – Impedance Emmanuele Ravaioli LHC-CM 11-11-2011

  16. dI/dt = 0, ±10, 20, 30, 40, ±50 A/s Imax > 50 Magnet Measurements in SM18: Results Different Imax – Phase Emmanuele Ravaioli LHC-CM 11-11-2011

  17. Imax = 0*, 50 A dI/dt = 0 A/s Apertures * Without Power Converters Measurements in SM18: Results Different Imax – Impedance Emmanuele Ravaioli LHC-CM 11-11-2011

  18. Imax = 0*, 50 A dI/dt = 0 A/s Apertures * Without Power Converters Measurements in SM18: Results Different Imax – Phase Emmanuele Ravaioli LHC-CM 11-11-2011

  19. Imax = 0*, 0 A dI/dt = 0 A/s Poles * Without Power Converters Measurements in SM18: Results Different Imax – Impedance Emmanuele Ravaioli LHC-CM 11-11-2011

  20. Imax = 0*, 0 A dI/dt = 0 A/s Poles * Without Power Converters Measurements in SM18: Results Different Imax – Phase Emmanuele Ravaioli LHC-CM 11-11-2011

  21. Imax = 0*, 50**, 1000, 2000 A dI/dt = 0 A/s Magnet, No Rparallel * Without Power Converters, With Rparallel ** With Rparallel Measurements in SM18: Results Different Imax – Impedance Emmanuele Ravaioli LHC-CM 11-11-2011

  22. Imax = 0*, 50**, 1000, 2000 A dI/dt = 0 A/s Magnet, No Rparallel * Without Power Converters, With Rparallel ** With Rparallel Measurements in SM18: Results Different Imax – Phase Emmanuele Ravaioli LHC-CM 11-11-2011

  23. Imax = 0*, 50**, 1000 A dI/dt = 0 A/s Apertures, No Rparallel * Without Power Converters, With Rparallel ** With Rparallel Measurements in SM18: Results Different Imax – Impedance Emmanuele Ravaioli LHC-CM 11-11-2011

  24. Imax = 0*, 50**, 1000 A dI/dt = 0 A/s Apertures, No Rparallel * Without Power Converters, With Rparallel ** With Rparallel Measurements in SM18: Results Different Imax – Phase Emmanuele Ravaioli LHC-CM 11-11-2011

  25. The measured Frequency Transfer Function (FTF) is not fitting with the expected one, and corresponds to parameters different from the nominal ones: • L 49 mH→ 35 mH • k 0.75 → 0.45-0.55 • Rparallel 100 Ω→ 80 Ω• R 10 Ω→ 30 Ω • The shape of the measured Frequency Transfer Function does not correspond to the expected curve calculated with the adopted electrical model. • Possible explanation: The model has been tailored on the measurements during Fast Power Aborts, when the main excitation frequency is ~28.5 Hz. Therefore it is possible that the model fits well the behavior of the dipoles, but only around 30 Hz. (see the qualitative example below: measurement, old model, new model) Comments on the results... -1 Emmanuele Ravaioli LHC-CM 11-11-2011

  26. Development of a new electrical model of the dipole apertures, fitting their behavior in a wider range of frequency, and test of its capability to simulate the actual behavior of the dipole circuit. Such a model could be developed by fitting the curve of the impedance of an aperture without Rparallel , and may include the splitting of the inductance in 3 parts (4 free parameters: k1, k2, R1, R2). Fitting already started with Matlab. Comments on the results... -1b Emmanuele Ravaioli LHC-CM 11-11-2011

  27. The AC inductance of the dipole even at low frequency (0.1 Hz) is about 35-40 mH, whereas the measured DC value is close to the nominal ~100 mH. This phenomenon has been observed in the past. The AC inductance was measured with two independent systems (without PCs between 0.1 Hz and 20 kHz; with PCs between 30 Hz and 2 kHz) with similar outcome. It would be interesting to perform this measurement also for the new configuration between 0.1 Hz and 30 Hz. (first attempt on Wednesday, still problems; Hugues is taking care of it). → At which frequency is the dipole changing its inductance? FTF almost independent on the current level (!) → Why do the dipoles exhibit a different behavior at different current? FTF almost independent on the current ramp-rate (!) FTF of the two apertures is very similar → Did we spot a perfectly balanced dipole? Comments on the results... -2 Emmanuele Ravaioli LHC-CM 11-11-2011

  28. The measurement system seems to work fine, and the results have physical significance. • The initial problems related to the poor quality of the measurement of the DCCT current have been solved (Miguel). • Thanks to the SM18 team for the kind support! • Further Work • Measurements of the FTF with the current configuration (parallel PCs) between 0.1 Hz and 30 Hz. To be done modulating a sinusoidal signal with the large PC, and measuring the impedance corresponding to different frequencies (manually). • Repeat the same measurements on another available spare dipole, hoping to spot an unbalanced dipole. • Development of a new electrical model of the dipole apertures, fitting their behavior in a wider range of frequency, and test of its capability to simulate the actual behavior of the dipole circuit. Such a model could be developed by fitting the curve of the impedance of an aperture without Rparallel , and may include the splitting of the inductance in 3 parts (4 free parameters: k1, k2, R1, R2). Fitting already started with Matlab. • Enlightened by the new results and model, check that the expected change of FTF is theoretically visible (With the old model, changing R1,2 between 7 and 10 Ω leads to a difference of ~1 dB of the impedance of two unbalanced apertures... With the new?). • Analysis of the past FTF measurements (at cold, no PCs, 0 current). • Analysis of the measurements of the FTF of the whole chain of 154 dipoles (Report Interpretation of the TFM tests of dipole circuits, PJK (?), 5 March 2008), and comparison with the calculated FTF of the series of 308 aperture models. Conclusions & Further Work Emmanuele Ravaioli LHC-CM 11-11-2011

More Related