1 / 23

Minnesota and Wisconsin CHIPS processes

Minnesota and Wisconsin CHIPS processes. Family Assessment:. Family assessment has been implemented in all 87 Minnesota Counties Family assessment is an alternative to the Child protection investigation process. Avoids “confrontation and intrusion of child protection investigation”.

buffy
Télécharger la présentation

Minnesota and Wisconsin CHIPS processes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Minnesota and Wisconsin CHIPS processes

  2. Family Assessment: • Family assessment has been implemented in all 87 Minnesota Counties • Family assessment is an alternative to the Child protection investigation process. • Avoids “confrontation and intrusion of child protection investigation”. • Family assessment assesses safety and risk of maltreatment

  3. Family Assessment: • Assesses and builds on strengths of families • Partners with families to find solutions to problems they are facing • Not used in cases of concern of imminent danger (i.e. injuries, sexual abuse, serious neglect. • Involves community agencies and organizations in providing support, and intervention before situation becomes more serious.

  4. Family Assessment: • Allows CPS flexibility to meet the needs of the family when child abuse and neglect is reported • Enables parents to receive services with minimal negative labeling • Meets individual family needs • Elicits community participation to support families and keep children safe.

  5. Family Assessment: • Short-term case management • If improvement in situation is not made, case goes to traditional investigation.

  6. Minnesota CHIPS process • Traditional investigation • Traditional investigations are conducted when there are concerns of imminent danger or sexual abuse • Investigations conducted in coordination with law enforcement • If safety concerns exist, CHIPS petition filed

  7. Minnesota CHIPS • If child is taken into custody, Law enforcement takes into “police protective custody” for up to 72 hours • Child protection has this time to file a CHIPS petition to keep the child in custody • Child is placed in Emergency Protective Care (EPC) • CHIPS hearing must be held within 10 days of EPC hearing

  8. Minnesota CHIPS • Petition may be filed with child in Emergency placement or with child remaining in home • If child is placed outside of home, may be in relative care or foster care

  9. Minnesota CHIPS • At initial hearing, parents may admit or deny the allegations in the petition • If deny, then the case may to go a trial by judge, most resolve before that time • Guardian Ad Litems are appointed in any case involving a child

  10. Minnesota CHIPS • GAL is a trained and certified volunteer from the community, appointed by the court to be the child’s representative in the court process • GAL evaluates actions taken by all parties and makes recommendations based on the best interest of the child

  11. Minnesota CHIPS • When case is opened goes to dispositional order, parents are ordered to complete certain conditions to regain placement of their children • 90 day review of case in court if child is in placement, 6 month if child is at home • Child may remain in their home or return home • If child cannot return home, Termination of Parental Rights Hearing may be filed.

  12. Children’s Justice Initiative • Collaboration between the Minnesota Judicial branch and Minnesota DHS. • Objective is to form a partnership between courts, SS agencies, attorneys, public defenders, courts, GAL and other stake holders to improve CPS cases. • “timely safe, stable, permanent homes for abused and neglected children, first through reunification with the child’s parents that if that is safe or, if not, through another permanent placement option.”

  13. Goals of the Children’s Justice Initiative • Operating through the “eyes of a child” • Timeliness of cases • Safety and stability of the child • Permanent, nurturing, family for each child • Recognition of cultural, social and economic differences • System accountability • Due process in court system

  14. Wisconsin CHIPS • When a report is received, if screened in assigned for investigation • Investigations usually conducted with law enforcement • If impending danger threats/safety concerns exist CHIPS petition may be filed • If child is taken into custody child placed with relative or in foster care

  15. Wisconsin CHIPS • Law Enforcement or Social Worker may take child into custody • CPS/delinquency Social workers are state certified to take child into custody • If child is taken into custody TPC hearing must be held within 48 hours, (excluding holidays and weekends) • CHIPS petition is filed at the TPC hearing

  16. Wisconsin CHIPS • After TPC hearing, initial plea hearing must be held within 30 days • At this time, parents may admit or deny the petition • If admit, dispositional hearing must be scheduled in 30 days • If deny, scheduled for fact-finding within 10 days • May go to trial by jury if parents do not agree • Most situations resolve before trial

  17. Wisconsin CHIPS • GAL is assigned any proceeding involving a child. If child is over the age of 12 they are assigned adversary counsel • GAL are attorneys, appointed by the court • When case is opened goes to dispositional order, parents are ordered to complete certain conditions to regain placement of their children

  18. Wisconsin CHIPS • CHIPS may be in-home or out of home • Court may order 30-60 day court reviews of cases • If child is placed out of the home, 6 month permanency review hearings are required • Child may remain in their home, or return home • If child cannot return home, Termination of Parental Rights Hearing may be filed.

  19. Wisconsin vs. Minnesota • Wisconsin social workers may take into custody • Minnesota only law enforcement • GAL in Minnesota may be community professional • GAL in Wisconsin must be an attorney • Time lines for reviews may vary • Minnesota has Family Assessment, Wisconsin only traditional investigation • Minnesota follows Chapter 260 of the Minnesota Statues • Wisconsin follows Chapter 48 of the Wisconsin Statutes

  20. Federal Legislation-Adoption and Safe Families Act • All states are mandated to follow the Adoption and Safe Families Act • When a child is placed in out of home care (relative or foster care) “the clock starts ticking”. • States are mandated to file for Termination of Parental Rights if a child has been in out of home care for 15 out of 22 months unless case meets certain exceptions

  21. Federal legislation • ASFA also states that if a parent has not made “substantial progress” in the first 6 months of the case, CPS agency may file for termination of parental rights. • ASFA requires 6 month review of permanency plan for child • ASFA requires a “concurrent plan” for children when they enter out of home care

  22. Concurrent Planning • Dual track for child to plan for permanency • If child cannot be reunified with their family of origin, have another plan ready to go when decision is made • Foster parents and relative placements are working with families to reunify, also prepared to adopt the child if reunification is not possible

  23. Family Based Services • Services offered to families focus on the needs of the family • Family Group Decision Making • In-home family counseling • Intensive parenting education • One-on-one parenting education • Family interaction- supervised/in foster home, family settings when possible as frequently as possible

More Related