1 / 26

Co-channel Interference Modelling Between RATs in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks

Co-channel Interference Modelling Between RATs in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks. Jason B. Ernst, University of Guelph Nidal Nasser, Alfaisal University Joel Rodrigues, University of Beira Interior. Presented at ICC 2012 – Wireless Network Symposium – June 14 th 2012. Introduction.

buzz
Télécharger la présentation

Co-channel Interference Modelling Between RATs in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Co-channel Interference Modelling Between RATs in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks Jason B. Ernst, University of Guelph Nidal Nasser, Alfaisal University Joel Rodrigues, University of Beira Interior Presented at ICC 2012 – Wireless Network Symposium – June 14th 2012

  2. Introduction • Motivation • Background • Experiment Setup & Methodology • Performance Evaluation • Discussion • Conclusions & Future Work ICC 2012- Wireless Network Symposium - June 14th, 2012

  3. Motivation • Modern devices have many options for connectivity (radio access technologies) or RATs ICC 2012- Wireless Network Symposium - June 14th, 2012

  4. Motivation • How can we seamlessly switch between RATs or enable multiple RATs simultaneously? ICC 2012- Wireless Network Symposium - June 14th, 2012

  5. Motivation: Problems? • Interaction between RATs is not well studied • Simulation tools often ignore interference between Wi-Fi and Bluetooth for example ICC 2012- Wireless Network Symposium - June 14th, 2012

  6. Motivation: Problems? • Interaction between RATs is not well studied • Certain algorithms assume homogeneous link capacities ICC 2012- Wireless Network Symposium - June 14th, 2012

  7. Motivation: Problems? Source: Wikipedia Source: Cisco ICC 2012- Wireless Network Symposium - June 14th, 2012

  8. Motivation: Why Bother? • Many reasons why the ability to seamless switch RATs is important: • More robust and reliable communications • Failover to other networks using different RATs • Potentially increased battery life • Selecting the most energy efficient RAT when possible • Potentially improved performance • Enabling multiple RATs at once ICC 2012- Wireless Network Symposium - June 14th, 2012

  9. Background • Previous studies show that partial overlapping of Wi-Fi channels does not significantly affect performance [Mishal et al, 2006] • What about overlap between RATs(ex: Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Zigbee)? ICC 2012- Wireless Network Symposium - June 14th, 2012

  10. Background • Will performance degrade with a small channel interfering with a larger channel? (Bluetooth interfering with Wi-Fi) • If not, is there a threshold number of Bluetooth interferers that causes performance degradation? ICC 2012- Wireless Network Symposium - June 14th, 2012

  11. Background • Will performance degrade with a larger channel interfering with a smaller channel? (Wi-Fi to Bluetooth interference) ICC 2012- Wireless Network Symposium - June 14th, 2012

  12. Background: Similar Studies • Shuaib et al [2005] • Bluetooth  Wi-Fi  Internet • Wi-Fi performance somewhat dependent on Bluetooth performance • Also only looks at Wi-Fi performance • We aim to send Bluetooth and Wi-Fi traffic independent of each other simultaneously • We aim to investigate both Wi-Fi and Bluetooth performance ICC 2012- Wireless Network Symposium - June 14th, 2012

  13. Background: Similar Studies • Carfang et al [2008] • More focused on how mobility affects communication in the face of interference • Guoet al [2010] • Focused on error rates and signal strengths while we are concerned with throughput ICC 2012- Wireless Network Symposium - June 14th, 2012

  14. Background: Simulation Interference Models ICC 2012- Wireless Network Symposium - June 14th, 2012

  15. Background: Interference Avoidance Techniques • In Bluetooth 1.2: Adaptive Frequency Hopping • Tries to sense what channel Wi-Fi is using and avoid those frequency ranges • What happens when Wi-Fi saturates the area as is common now? • Other techniques where Wi-Fi and Bluetooth chips communicate directly to avoid • What happens when using external Bluetooth adaptors, chips that do not support etc? ICC 2012- Wireless Network Symposium - June 14th, 2012

  16. Experiment Setup • An equal number of Bluetooth and Wi-Fi devices • Located within a lab at the University of Guelph ICC 2012- Wireless Network Symposium - June 14th, 2012

  17. Laptop Node ICC 2012- Wireless Network Symposium - June 14th, 2012

  18. Methodology • FTP file transfers between nodes • Input from /dev/random on Ubuntu 11.10 • Wi-Fi file size was 10 megabytes • Bluetooth file size was 1 megabyte • Difference is because of the order of magnitude difference in link capacity so that a single transfer would finish roughly at the same time ICC 2012- Wireless Network Symposium - June 14th, 2012

  19. Methodology • Up to 6 laptops using each technology (6 Bluetooth and 6 Wi-Fi laptops) • Experiment performed late in the evening when few students use the campus Wi-Fi to decrease external interference • 30 Repetitions for each data point • Throughput is averaged across all nodes using particular technology ICC 2012- Wireless Network Symposium - June 14th, 2012

  20. Performance Evaluation ICC 2012- Wireless Network Symposium - June 14th, 2012

  21. Performance Evaluation ICC 2012- Wireless Network Symposium - June 14th, 2012

  22. Discussion • Bluetooth performance particularly is affected by Wi-Fi nodes in the region • Fig 2: 2, 3, 4 devices all show decreased performance due to interference • In some cases Wi-Fi nodes are also affected by Bluetooth interference • Fig 3: 3 devices ICC 2012- Wireless Network Symposium - June 14th, 2012

  23. Discussion • Decreased performance due to increased contention within the technology more to blame than interference between technologies, but still some effect • In future experiments, it may be best to vary the number of one type of node at a time to isolate the cause of decreased performance ICC 2012- Wireless Network Symposium - June 14th, 2012

  24. Conclusions & Future Work • Results show that Bluetooth is significantly affected by Wi-Fi interference within the same channel range • Result also showed limited cases of Wi-Fi being affected by Bluetooth interference • Results make the case that simulation tools should begin to support interference modelling between technologies ICC 2012- Wireless Network Symposium - June 14th, 2012

  25. Conclusions & Future Work • In future experiments, vary number of nodes with a particular RAT while leaving other constant • Expand to include other RATs, ex Zigbee • Vary the distance, introduce mobility • Develop heterogeneous access schemes that avoid interference between RATs ICC 2012- Wireless Network Symposium - June 14th, 2012

  26. Thank you for Attending! Questions? Jason Ernst, University of Guelph jernst@uoguelph.ca ICC 2012- Wireless Network Symposium - June 14th, 2012

More Related