1 / 9

Scaling up the Integrated Prevention Campaign: Health Impact and Cost by Setting and Globally

Scaling up the Integrated Prevention Campaign: Health Impact and Cost by Setting and Globally July 25, 2012. Elliot Marseille, DrPH, MPP Health Strategies International University of California, San Francisco University of Washington.

byrd
Télécharger la présentation

Scaling up the Integrated Prevention Campaign: Health Impact and Cost by Setting and Globally

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Scaling up the Integrated Prevention Campaign: Health Impact and Cost by Setting and Globally July 25, 2012 Elliot Marseille, DrPH, MPPHealth Strategies InternationalUniversity of California, San FranciscoUniversity of Washington Integrated Prevention Campaign: Evidence for Impact and Efficiency Global Potential and Sustainability XIX International AIDS Conference Non-Commercial Satellite Washington DC

  2. Ipc cost, top 10 countries IN per-capita disease burden, per 1000 participants

  3. Cost-Effectiveness: usd / daly AVERTED

  4. Cost-Effectiveness: usd / daly AVERTED

  5. Ipc cost, per 1000 IPC participants Campaign 2

  6. Cost-EffectivenessCampaign 2

  7. multi-country IPC initiative: Costs and Net costs Assumes 15% population coverage

  8. multi-country IPC initiative :DALYs Averted

  9. Conclusions – Implications • IPC is highly cost-effective or cost saving in the 10 countries of highest opportunity. • Even more favorable if ART used as cost-effectiveness threshold. • Costs decline and cost-effectiveness generally more favorable in follow-up campaigns. • If implemented in top 40 opportunity countries IPC could avert 46 million DALYs and save $1.4 billion. If taken to scale, IPC can be a highly efficient strategy for improving global health.

More Related