1 / 7

Organization of Genome Data into Pathways and Networks

Organization of Genome Data into Pathways and Networks. Peter D. Karp, Ph.D. Bioinformatics Research Group SRI International pkarp@ai.sri.com. Organization of Genome Data into Pathways and Networks. Summarize state of the art, existing approaches Opportunities for new research directions

caden
Télécharger la présentation

Organization of Genome Data into Pathways and Networks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Organization of Genome Data into Pathways and Networks Peter D. Karp, Ph.D. Bioinformatics Research Group SRI International pkarp@ai.sri.com

  2. Organization of Genome Data intoPathways and Networks • Summarize state of the art, existing approaches • Opportunities for new research directions • Limitations in current approaches

  3. Assigning Genes to Pathways Proteomics Gene Expression Metabolomics Genome Sequence Infer kinetic model Infer metabolic pathways Infer FBA model Infer pathway hole fillers Infer other modes of regulation Infer transcriptional regulatory relationships Infer operons BioCyc KEGG Reactome VIMSS

  4. Limitations in Pathway Assignment • Inference of metabolic pathways • Quality of genome annotations • False positives • False negatives (ORFs and missing multiple functions) • Lack of controlled vocabulary in many genome annotations • Lack of probability values in genome annotations • Many enzymes within pathways can never be present in a genome annotation – never sequenced

  5. Experimental/Computational PartnershipTo Improve Genome Annotations • Focused effort proposed to • Experimentally verify computational predictions of functions for genes of unknown function • Seek which genes encode functions with no associated sequence • Capture computational and experimental results in common database • Roberts, R.J., Karp, P.D., Kasif, S., Linn, S., and Buckley, M.R. ``An Experimental Approach to Genome Annotation,'' (2004) published by the American Society for Microbiology, http://www.asm.org/academy/index.asp?bid=32664. • Roberts, R., “Identifying protein function - A call for community action,” PLoS Biology 2:E42 2004 http://biology.plosjournals.org/plosonline/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.0020042 • Karp, P.D., “Call for an enzyme genomics initiative” Genome Biology 5:401.1-3 http://genomebiology.com/2004/5/8/401

  6. Limitations in Pathway Assignment • Inference of metabolic pathways • Prediction of novel pathways • Pathway databases don’t yet contain all experimentally elucidated pathways • Choosing among multiple pathway variants • Lack of experimental testing of predicted pathways; results would likely lead to improvements in prediction algorithms

  7. Curation of Organism-SpecificPathway Models • Centralized in a single group? • Distributed across many groups? • Automated mining of pathways from the literature

More Related