1 / 20

Preprocessing of Vector Magnetograms for Extrapolation of Coronal Magnetic Fields

Preprocessing of Vector Magnetograms for Extrapolation of Coronal Magnetic Fields. General Discussion. Assumption: force-free:  with Force-free condition holds above 400km

caesar-lara
Télécharger la présentation

Preprocessing of Vector Magnetograms for Extrapolation of Coronal Magnetic Fields

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Preprocessing of Vector Magnetograms for Extrapolation of Coronal Magnetic Fields

  2. General Discussion • Assumption: force-free:  with • Force-free condition holds above 400km • Measurements might be affected by non-magnetic effects • Extrapolation should take into account of plasma conditions

  3. Test case & Reality Low&Lou Bastille Event

  4. Preprocessing • Problems on real magnetograms • Force-free ? • Noise (lack of smootheness) • Hidden problems? • Philosophy: • Different mgms, close to the original one • Staying within given errorbars

  5. Preprocessing: Minimization • Force-freeness [Molodenskii (1969)] • Magnetic-field Stress Tensor T with ext. forces F • Force-free condition 

  6. Preprocessing: Minimization • Force-freeness • Transforming surface integral into an integral along contour L • Since the magnetic field weakens as the diameter of contour L increases, surface integral will approach to zero • Magnetic field decreases with height

  7. Preprocessing: Minimization • Torque-Freeness • Same procedure, but multiply vectorially with r • Then integrate over surface S, the z-component of the resulting equation • Seperating out the divergence part • Similar as before

  8. How to Preprocess: Minimization • Force-free • Torque-free

  9. Preprocessing: Minimization • Smootheness • Current Method: Laplacian 4th order • Pro: smoothes the Magnetogram, because of averaging the discontinuities • Contra: flattens the whole Magnetogram

  10. Numerical Expressions • L* : treshold to control smoothing • L4=0  no curvature

  11. Normalizations

  12. Minimizing functional

  13. Method of Minimization: Simulated Annealing • Usual Minimizing(Newton-Raphson, etc.) of a function leads to nearest local minimum, depends on starting point • Current Problem: • functional with several constraints • Several local minima • Simulated annealing finds also local minima, but leaves a chance to get out of it, in order to find better local minima

  14. How does Simulated Annealing Work? • Choose randomly new value of Bx,y,z • But within a small interval (~± 0.5%) • Calculate L, check if LNEW ≤LOLD • TRUE: Take Bnewx,y,z & forget Boldx,y,z, • FALSE: Take with probability ~ exp{-(LNEW - LOLD)} • Repeat • To scan the whole domain • Domain within given errorbars of the measurement (depends if transversal or normal component of Magnetogram)

  15. Results: preprocessing just force- & torque-freenessQuality of force- & torque-freeness

  16. Results: preprocessing just force- & torque-freenessMagnetogram

  17. Results: preprocessing both constraintsMagnetogram

  18. Results: preprocessing both constraints Quality of force-freeness

  19. Compared Results

  20. Conclusions • Extrapolation successful, but on real cases lack of force-freeness (σJ ~ 10-1) • Preprocessing: • successful to make magnetogram force-free  better agreement with initial assumption  slightly better results, but not enough • Difficulties to smooth without flattening  have to find a better smoothing term!

More Related