1 / 13

Beyond 3G-324M Conversational Services

Beyond 3G-324M Conversational Services. Andrea Basso System Architect NMS Communications. PC. 3G /2G network. IP. Mobile Video services. SIP Video phones. 3G-324M 64 kbps video phones. Media adaptation (MMS,web,..). Messaging. H.323 Video phones. Video mail system. Desktop

caesar
Télécharger la présentation

Beyond 3G-324M Conversational Services

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Beyond 3G-324M Conversational Services Andrea Basso System Architect NMS Communications

  2. PC 3G /2G network IP Mobile Video services SIP Video phones 3G-324M 64 kbps video phones Media adaptation (MMS,web,..) Messaging H.323 Video phones Video mail system Desktop Video terminals Streaming Video streaming media server Gateways 3G-324M-RTSP gateway 2.5 G Phones MMS 3G-324M-H.323 gateway IETF/SIP 3GPP/SIP H.323 Video conferencing system WEB content renderer Conferencing 3G-324M-SIP gateway Video/audio transcoders

  3. Mobile Video Services characteristics Increasing complexity

  4. Role of 3G-324M in Mobile Video Services • 3G-324M is becoming the protocol of choice and the wireless multimedia and video services enabler • Carriers and application service providers are relying on 3G-324M for a variety of communication and entertainment service scenarios • Point-to-point and multipoint video telephony • Wireless to wireline (IP) video • Video enabled instant messaging and chat • Videoconferencing • Remote monitoring and surveillance • Video streaming • Video mail/video call answering • Multimedia real-time gaming

  5. MMSC 2.5G Phone Message store Message Recording and Retrieval among 3G phones with different codecs VoiceMail Server PSTN 3G- 324M Video Mail system Codec B WEB Server 3G-324M Phones Cable Head End Transcoding Media Adaptation Codec A Support for Heterogeneous Terminals 3G-324M Video Call Answering/Messaging

  6. 3G-324M Streaming Gateway Scenarios HotSpots Nr:12345678 Nr:23456789 Nr:34567890 Call 12345678 for camera 1 Streaming Gateway 3G-324M IP Call 87654321 for Video 1 RTSP Streaming Server

  7. Characteristics STREAMING VIDEO CALL ANSWERING • Playback of multiple bitstreams coded differently • I.e. advertising and video clips • Comparable user experience on heterogeneous terminals • PDAs, wireless video phones, set-top boxes, desktop PCs • Translation of the signaling • Adaptation to the different media content (H.263/MPEG-4/H.264 …) • Playback of multiple video clips in different coding formats in the same call with apriori knowledge • 3G-324M is a natural choice for video call answering • Voicemail analogy • Comparable user experience on heterogeneous terminals • PDAs, wireless video phones, set-top boxes, desktop PCs, text-only devices, audio-only devices • Translation of the signaling • Adaptation to the different media content (H.263/MPEG-4/H.264 …) • Playback of multiple prompts and messages in different coding formats in the same call without apriori knowledge Prompt Message 1 Message N LOGICAL CHANNEL

  8. Issues • 3G-324M terminals characteristics • have different media coding capabilities (H-263 and MPEG-4 today) • Variations of bitstream characteristics inside the same coding format (H.263/MPEG-4) • MPEG-4 RVLC/DP , H.263 baseline and profile 3 • Close/open logical channels introduces an unnatural delay (1, 2 seconds)

  9. More… • Codec control commands and stored content • Flow control ,Video fast update request • There is not remote codec to control • VCR-like functions in message playback • Require bitstreams coded with random access characteristics • Clarifications needed in the standard • Inband signaling for H.263 and MPEG-4 • IF2 AMR on the link IF1 AMR in storage (I.e. 3GPP .3gp) • ….

  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Iteration Delta PSNR (dB) -1 Picture type preservation -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 Recoding Solution: Always-on Transcoding • PROS: • Provides • Bitstream random access • Bitstream will be re-encoded with regular I-frames • Codec control commands • Transcoder will support video fast update and flow control • CONS: • Expensive • Requires intense media processing • Quality issues CAN WE DO BETTER THAN THIS?

  11. The Smart Alternative • Bitstream differences • Support inband signaling to handle variations in the video bitstreams • Clarify the standard • Transcode only when necessary • I.e H.263 to MPEG-4 • Only a part of the total traffic will need transcoding • Random access • Messaging : video fast updates requests in recording to allow random access in playback • Streaming: by definition should provide random access

  12. More… • Error Resilience • Rely on the video bitstream tools for error resilience • Advantages • Cheaper • Less transcoding • Better quality • Content is delivered in its ‘original’ format whenever possible

  13. Conclusions • 3G-324M is playing a key role in enabling wireless multimedia and video. • Needs ‘fine tuning’ to optimal support of streaming and messaging services. • Key role of the interoperability tests and IMTC to get a common agreement on the implementation of the functionalities

More Related