1 / 86

Causes of Graft Loss over 10 Years in CsA-Treated Patients

Causes of Graft Loss over 10 Years in CsA-Treated Patients. Recurrent disease 6% . Other 3%. Acute Rejection 11% . PNF 5%. Vascular 8%. Death 27%. CAN 40%. Marcén R et al. Transplantation 2001; 72:57  62. Presentation techniques Some personal advice. I. Performance

cais
Télécharger la présentation

Causes of Graft Loss over 10 Years in CsA-Treated Patients

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Causes of Graft Loss over 10 Years in CsA-Treated Patients Recurrent disease 6% Other 3% Acute Rejection 11% PNF 5% Vascular 8% Death 27% CAN 40% Marcén R et al. Transplantation 2001; 72:5762.

  2. Presentation techniquesSome personal advice • I. Performance • II. Manuscript • III. Slides

  3. Presentation techniquesSome personal advice • I. Performance • II. Manuscript • III. Slides

  4. I. Performance • Never turn your back on the audience • Always look at the audience • (and the laptop)

  5. I. Performance • Never turn your back on the audience • Always look at the audience • (and the laptop) • Never use the laser pointer • Always use your slides to make your point

  6. Causes of Graft Loss over 10 Years in CsA-Treated Patients Recurrent disease 6% Other 3% Acute Rejection 11% PNF 5% Vascular 8% Death 27% CAN 40% Marcén R et al. Transplantation 2001; 72:5762.

  7. Causes of Graft Loss over 10 Years in CsA-Treated Patients Recurrent disease 6% Other 3% Acute Rejection 11% PNF 5% Vascular 8% Death 27% CVD CNI- nephrotox CAN 40% Marcén R et al. Transplantation 2001; 72:57-62.

  8. Metabolic Toxicities of Immunosuppressive Drugs CsA = cyclosporine A; Tac = tacrolimus; Ster = corticosteroids; SRL/EVL = sirolimus/everolimus; AZA = azathioprine Adapted from Danovitch GM. Transplant Rev 2000; 14:65–81.

  9. Metabolic Toxicities of Immunosuppressive Drugs CsA = cyclosporine A; Tac = tacrolimus; Ster = corticosteroids; SRL/EVL = sirolimus/everolimus; AZA = azathioprine Adapted from Danovitch GM. Transplant Rev 2000; 14:65–81.

  10. Metabolic Toxicities of Immunosuppressive Drugs CsA = cyclosporine A; Tac = tacrolimus; Ster = corticosteroids; SRL/EVL = sirolimus/everolimus; AZA = azathioprine Adapted from Danovitch GM. Transplant Rev 2000; 14:65–81.

  11. Metabolic Toxicities of Immunosuppressive Drugs CsA = cyclosporine A; Tac = tacrolimus; Ster = corticosteroids; SRL/EVL = sirolimus/everolimus; AZA = azathioprine Adapted from Danovitch GM. Transplant Rev 2000; 14:65–81.

  12. Metabolic Toxicities of Immunosuppressive Drugs CsA = cyclosporine A; Tac = tacrolimus; Ster = corticosteroids; SRL/EVL = sirolimus/everolimus; AZA = azathioprine Adapted from Danovitch GM. Transplant Rev 2000; 14:65–81.

  13. 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 400 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 450 500 Daclizumab Reduces the Risk of Biopsy-Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) • Cumulative incidence of first BPAR • Pooled analysis of 12-month data from two pivotal trials Placebo (n=268) 116 events Daclizumab (n=267) 74 events Probability p = 0.0001 (stratified logrank test) Time after transplantation (days) Ekberg H et al. Transplant Int 2000; 13:151–9.

  14. 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 400 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 450 500 Daclizumab Reduces the Risk of Biopsy-Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) • Cumulative incidence of first BPAR • Pooled analysis of 12-month data from two pivotal trials Placebo (n=268) 116 events Daclizumab (n=267) 74 events Probability p = 0.0001 (stratified logrank test) Time after transplantation (days) Ekberg H et al. Transplant Int 2000; 13:151–9.

  15. I. Performance • Never turn your back on the audience • Always look at the audience • Never use the laser pointer • Always use your slides to make your point • Always time your performance at home • 3 - 7 - 10 - 20 minutes sharp

  16. I. Performance • Never turn your back on the audience • Always look at the audience • Never use the laser pointer • Always use your slides to make your point • Always time your performance at home • Always prepare your opening sentences

  17. Opening sentence You will always be nervous: Sit in the front - look back Prepare your opening sentence - the rest will come by itself

  18. Opening sentence You will always be nervous: Sit in the front - look back Prepare your opening sentence - the rest will come by itself Mr chairman, ladies and gentlemen! (.) For many years (.) steroids have been the backbone (.) of our manitenance IS (.) Now is the time to challenge them (.)

  19. Opening sentence You will always be nervous: Sit in the front - look back Prepare your opening sentence - the rest will come by itself Members and guests (.) I thank the organizers for inviting me (.) and I thank all of you for joining us (.) in this symposium tonight (.) Do not repeat the title of your talk

  20. Presentation techniquesSome personal advice • I. Performance • II. Manuscript • III. Slides

  21. II. Manuscript • Never read a manuscript of your talk • Always use your slides as the manuscript

  22. 150-300 ng/ml for 3 months 100-200 ng/ml thereafter A Normal dose CsA MMF Steroids 50–100 ng/ml Daclizumab Low dose CsA B MMF Steroids 3-7 ng/ml Daclizumab Low dose TAC C MMF Steroids 4-8 ng/ml Daclizumab Low dose SRL D MMF Steroids SYMPHONY Study Design 6 mo 12 mo Tx Ekberg H et al Am J Transpl 2006, 6 (suppl 2), #49; 83.

  23. Symphony study Main inclusion criteria • Renal transplant recipients 18  75 years • Single-organ, kidney • Living or deceased donors Main exclusion criteria • Panel reactive antibodies > 20% • Cold ischaemic time > 30 hours • History of malignancy

  24. Never read a manuscript • Always use your slides as the manuscript • Always describe your slide immediately II. Manuscript

  25. p=0.0014 p<0.0001 p<0.0001 Calculated GFR(CockcroftGault) 100 90 80 Normal-dose CsA 65 70 59 Low-dose CsA 57 57 60 Low-dose TAC GFR (Cockcroft Gault) (ml/min) 50 Low-dose SRL 40 30 20 10 0 12 months post-Tx Ekberg H et al Am J Transpl 2006, 6 (suppl 2), #49; 83.

  26. High Prevalence of Subclinical Rejection (SCR) • Prevalence SCR • 1 mo 61 % • 3 mo 46 % • 1 yr 26 % 80 60 Prevalence (%) 40 Acute rejection SCR (acute) 20 SCR (borderline) 0 10 0.1 0.25 0.5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Time after transplantation (years) Nankivell BJ et al. N Engl J Med 2003; 349:232633.

  27. II. Manuscript • Never read a manuscript • Always use your slides as the manuscript • Always describe your slide immediately • Never start with comments

  28. II. Manuscript • Never read a manuscript • Always use your slides as the manuscript • Always describe your slide immediately • Never start with comments • let comments come last • make one extra slide

  29. p=0.0014 p<0.0001 p<0.0001 Calculated GFR(CockcroftGault) 100 90 80 Normal-dose CsA 65 70 59 Low-dose CsA 57 57 60 Low-dose TAC GFR (CockcroftGault) (ml/min) 50 Low-dose SRL 40 30 No significant difference between CsA and Low-CsA 20 10 0 12 months post-Tx Ekberg H et al Am J Transpl 2006, 6 (suppl 2), #49; 83.

  30. High Prevalence of Subclinical Rejection (SCR) • Prevalence SCR • 1 mo 61 % • 3 mo 46 % • 1 yr 26 % 80 60 Prevalence (%) 40 Acute rejection SCR (acute) 20 SCR (borderline) 0 10 0.1 0.25 0.5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Time after transplantation (years) Nankivell BJ et al. N Engl J Med 2003; 349:232633.

  31. High Prevalence of Subclinical Rejection (SCR) • Prevalence SCR • 1 mo 61 % • 3 mo 46 % • 1 yr 26 % 80 High risk for AR after CNI w/d Lower risk 60 Prevalence (%) 40 Acute rejection SCR (acute) 20 SCR (borderline) 0 10 0.1 0.25 0.5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Time after transplantation (years) Nankivell BJ et al. N Engl J Med 2003; 349:2326-33.

  32. II. Manuscript • Never read a manuscript • Always use your slides as the manuscript • Always describe your slide immediately Why is this so important? Because the audience cannot read your slide and listento you at the same time - > Competition

  33. II. Manuscript • Never read a manuscript • Always use your slides as the manuscript • Always describe your slide immediately - > Competition TV news + kids TV news + Radio news

  34. II. Manuscript • Never read a manuscript • Always use your slides as the manuscript • Always describe your slide immediately • Always send on one channel at the time So read your text with them first then give your comments TV news first, then radio

  35. Methods • Acute rejection was defined as biopsy-proven and treated events within 6 months after transplantation excluding borderline cases

  36. Methods • Acute Rejection • Biopsy-proven • Treated patients • Within 6 mo. • Excluding Borderline

  37. II. Manuscript • Never read a manuscript • Always use your slides as the manuscript • Always describe your slide immediately • Send on one channel at the time • Always use a strategy • (chapters, line of thoughts)

  38. Strategy This is a study that shows the benefit of steroid withdrawal … the study… In conclusion, this study has shown the benefit of steroid withdrawal. • First, say what you are going to tell us • Then tell us • Finally, say what you have told us

  39. Chapters • Divide your talk into chapters • 1. Background • 2. Aim • 3. Method • 4. Results • 5. Conclusion

  40. Chapters • Divide your talk into chapters • 1. Background - 2 slides • 2. Aim - 1 slide • 3. Method - 2 slides • 4. Results - 3 slides • 5. Conclusion - 1 slide • 8 - 10 slides = 7 minutes

  41. Presentation techniquesSome personal advice • I. Performance • II. Manuscript • III. Slides

  42. III. Slides • Never apologize for a busy slide • - discard it! • Never say ’as you can see’ • it means nobody can see!

  43. Table 2. Multivariate Risk Estimates for Endpoint of Overall Graft Loss* This is actually a slide that was used in a congress *Table displays main variable of interest and significant (α < .05) covariates in the model.

  44. Multivariate risk estimates for graft loss Somebody et al ATC 2004

  45. Multivariate risk estimates for graft loss Somebody et al ATC 2004

  46. Multivariate risk estimates for graft loss Somebody et al ATC 2004

  47. Multivariate risk estimates for graft loss Somebody et al ATC 2004

  48. Multivariate risk estimates for graft loss Somebody et al ATC 2004

  49. Creatinine levels in posttransplant periods by CNI Kaplan and Meier-Kriesche ATC 2004

  50. Creatinine levels in posttransplant periods by CNI Kaplan and Meier-Kriesche ATC 2004

More Related