1 / 24

4.3 to 4.5 Proving Δ s are  : SSS, SAS, HL, ASA, & AAS

4.3 to 4.5 Proving Δ s are  : SSS, SAS, HL, ASA, & AAS. OBJECTIVES. Use the SSS Postulate Use the SAS Postulate Use the HL Theorem Use ASA Postulate Use AAS Theorem. Postulate 19 (SSS) Side-Side-Side  Postulate.

Télécharger la présentation

4.3 to 4.5 Proving Δ s are  : SSS, SAS, HL, ASA, & AAS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 4.3 to 4.5 Proving Δs are  : SSS, SAS, HL, ASA, & AAS

  2. OBJECTIVES • Use the SSS Postulate • Use the SAS Postulate • Use the HL Theorem • Use ASA Postulate • Use AAS Theorem

  3. Postulate 19 (SSS)Side-Side-Side  Postulate • If 3 sides of one Δ are  to 3 sides of another Δ, then the Δs are .

  4. E A F C D B More on the SSS Postulate If AB ED, AC EF, & BC DF, then ΔABC ΔEDF.

  5. Write a proof. GIVEN KL NL,KM NM PROVE KLMNLM Proof KL NL andKM NM It is given that LM LN. By the Reflexive Property, So, by the SSS Congruence Postulate, KLMNLM EXAMPLE 1: Use the SSS Congruence Postulate

  6. ACBCAD 1. GIVEN : BC AD ACBCAD PROVE : It is given that BC AD By Reflexive property AC AC, But AB is not congruent CD. PROOF: YOUR TURN: GUIDED PRACTICE Decide whether the congruence statement is true. Explain your reasoning. SOLUTION

  7. YOUR TURN (continued): GUIDED PRACTICE Therefore the given statement is false and ABC is not Congruent to CAD because corresponding sides are not congruent

  8. 2. QPTRST GIVEN : QT TR , PQ SR, PT TS PROVE : QPTRST It is given that QT TR, PQ SR, PT TS.So by SSS congruence postulate, QPT RST. Yes, the statement is true. PROOF: YOUR TURN: GUIDED PRACTICE Decide whether the congruence statement is true. Explain your reasoning. SOLUTION

  9. Postulate 20 (SAS)Side-Angle-Side  Postulate • If 2 sides and the included  of one Δ are  to 2 sides and the included  of another Δ, then the 2 Δs are .

  10. More on the SAS Postulate • If BC YX, AC ZX, & C X, then ΔABC  ΔZXY. B Y ) ( A C X Z

  11. BC DA,BC AD ABCCDA STATEMENTS REASONS S BC DA Given Given BC AD BCADAC A Alternate Interior Angles Theorem S ACCA Reflexive Property of Congruence EXAMPLE 2 Example 2: Use the SAS Congruence Postulate Write a proof. GIVEN PROVE

  12. EXAMPLE 2 Example 2 (continued): STATEMENTS REASONS ABCCDA SAS Congruence Postulate

  13. Given: DR  AG and AR GRProve: Δ DRA  ΔDRG. Example 4: D R A G

  14. Example 4 (continued): Statements_______ 1. DR  AG; AR  GR 2. DR  DR 3.DRG & DRA are rt. s 4.DRG   DRA 5. Δ DRG  Δ DRA Reasons____________ 1. Given 2. Reflexive Property 3.  lines form 4 rt. s 4. Right s Theorem 5. SAS Postulate D R G A

  15. Theorem 4.5 (HL)Hypotenuse - Leg  Theorem • If the hypotenuse and a leg of a right Δ are  to the hypotenuse and a leg of a second Δ, then the 2 Δs are .

  16. Postulate 21(ASA):Angle-Side-Angle Congruence Postulate • If two angles and the included side of one triangle are congruent to two angles and the included side of a second triangle, then the triangles are congruent.

  17. Theorem 4.6 (AAS): Angle-Angle-Side Congruence Theorem • If two angles and a non-included side of one triangle are congruent to two angles and the corresponding non-included side of a second triangle, then the triangles are congruent.

  18. Proof of the Angle-Angle-Side (AAS) Congruence Theorem Given:A  D, C  F, BC  EF Prove: ∆ABC  ∆DEF D A B F C Paragraph Proof You are given that two angles of ∆ABC are congruent to two angles of ∆DEF. By the Third Angles Theorem, the third angles are also congruent. That is, B  E. Notice that BC is the side included between B and C, and EF is the side included between E and F. You can apply the ASA Congruence Postulate to conclude that ∆ABC  ∆DEF. E

  19. Example 5: Is it possible to prove these triangles are congruent? If so, state the postulate or theorem you would use. Explain your reasoning.

  20. Example 5 (continued): In addition to the angles and segments that are marked, EGF JGH by the Vertical Angles Theorem. Two pairs of corresponding angles and one pair of corresponding sides are congruent. Thus, you can use the AAS Congruence Theorem to prove that ∆EFG  ∆JHG.

  21. Example 6: Is it possible to prove these triangles are congruent? If so, state the postulate or theorem you would use. Explain your reasoning.

  22. Example 6 (continued): In addition to the congruent segments that are marked, NP  NP. Two pairs of corresponding sides are congruent. This is not enough information to prove the triangles are congruent.

  23. Example 7: Given: AD║EC, BD  BC Prove: ∆ABD  ∆EBC Plan for proof: Notice that ABD and EBC are congruent. You are given that BD  BC. Use the fact that AD ║EC to identify a pair of congruent angles.

  24. Example 7 (continued): Reasons: • Given • Given • If || lines, then alt. int. s are  • Vertical Angles Theorem • ASA Congruence Postulate Statements: • BD  BC • AD ║ EC • D  C • ABD  EBC • ∆ABD  ∆EBC

More Related