1 / 26

FIRE

FIRE. Future Internet Research and Experimentation. TNC’2009 Malaga Susanna Avéssta, DIMES. validation. large scale experimentation. long-term research. requirements. Testbed. Testbed. Testbed. Testbed. Testbed. Testbed. Future Internet Research and Experimentation.

calida
Télécharger la présentation

FIRE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FIRE Future Internet Research and Experimentation TNC’2009 Malaga Susanna Avéssta, DIMES

  2. validation large scale experimentation long-term research requirements Testbed Testbed Testbed Testbed Testbed Testbed Future Internet Research and Experimentation • Allowing European researchers to test new paradigms at large scale, including interactions with end users and communities • Internet as a complex system: need to promote strategic, advanced, experimentally-driven, multi-disciplinary research on new internet concepts

  3. FIREworks • Support Action coordinating FIRE projects • FIRE Community • FIRE Initiative • FIRE Office • International relations • FIRE Strategy • What research? What testbeds? • How to federate? Roadmap for FIRE Facility

  4. FIRE Research • Future Internet as a Complex System • Cross-layer, multidisciplinary, system approach • Need for testing on the experimental facility • Visionary research on Internet protocols, architectures and services • Open, bottom-up approach • Not necessarily backward-compatible • Multidisciplinary, allowing cross-fertilisation, e.g. bio-inspired principles, evolutionary concepts, economic principles, … • Experimentally-driven research • Not just paperwork: research, theories must be based on testbeds and data-driven experiments • Allowing identification of potential evolutionary transition paths • People?

  5. FIRE landscape PERIM PII Vital++ SMART OL2 NaDa WISEB N4C ECOD OPN Resum Self

  6. FP7 – WP 2007/08: Prototyping the conceptof federating testbeds Next: Expanding the concept & building the facility FP6: Early design & prototyping • Expand to include service architectures • Support experimentation cutting across layers • Enable socio-economic impact assessment • Broaden involvement of large user communities • Support sustainability • Develop the facility in close cooperation with FIRE research projects • Join forces in Europeand collaborateinternationally PARADISO FIREWorks PII ONELAB2 VITAL++ WISEBED FIRE Facility FIRE-Research:New paradigms Network ofthe Future Other ProjectsFP7, MSs, … • Open and dynamic • Supporting academia and industry • Proof-of-concept → pre-commercial tbs • Understanding the socio-economic dim. Buiding FIRE Facility FEDERICA

  7. Building FIRE Facility • Bridging between FIRE Facility projects: OneLab2 and PII (Vital++, WISEBED, FEDERICA) • Identifying scope and target customers • Use scenarios • Identifying usage and potential need for cross-federation • What use scenarios? • How much usage? • How implementable? • Common nominators: umbrella or architecture?

  8. Building FIRE Facility Cloud computing PII

  9. What is the federation of the testbeds? • A federation is a union comprising a number of partially self-governing regions united by a central ("federal") government under a common set of objectives. • Interconnection of two or more independent testbeds for • Creation of a richer environment for testing and experimentation • Increased multilateral benefits of the users of the individual testbeds • Normally geographically dispersed • Owned by different organisations. • However, considered as being part of a single resource • Dynamic and evolve over time based on the requirements of the users Common objectives – Added value!

  10. Vision for FIRE Facility • FIRE Facility the core of the European and global testing market • High-quality test centre, trustworthy partner and an integral part of European R&D in FI/NWGN • Reference point to the standardisation of the sector • Neutral and independent • Versatile services, well-productised activities, fast processes, open but can be walled as needed • Good, well-reasoned and quality enhancing control • Incubator of new innovations • Autonomy of resource providers ensured

  11. Onelab2 and the federation concept From Serge Fdida, Panayotis Antoniadis and Timur Friedman

  12. Vision

  13. Customer View on Experimentation • What do I want to achieve? • Test a proposition, e.g., • Technology • New service • End user acceptance • A new business hypothesis (e.g., business model) • A new regulatory approach with given objectives • Openness of results • Exclusive IPR • Integration into larger facilities (for increased testing purposes) • Scale of experiment • Diversity of environment, e.g., locality, technologies, …

  14. Where does the Facility Come In? A means to the (customers') ends! • Is A Facility… • …A collection of test beds (each individually governed)? • …A collection of test bed federations? • …A single test bed federation? • Or is it a toolkit to support the customers' needs with the ability to • Build a federation that match the objectives at hand • Build on working test beds but also allow to integrate its own • Apply technologies proven to work (to a certain extent) • Rely on a community of researchers and practitioners dealing with similar (testing and research) problems?

  15. Where does the Facility Come In? A means to the (customers') ends! • Is A Facility… • …A collection of test beds (each individually governed)? • …A collection of test bed federations? • …A single test bed federation? • Or is it a toolkit to support the customers' needs with the ability to • Build a federation that match the objectives at hand • Build on working test beds but also allow to integrate its own • Apply technologies proven to work (to a certain extent) • Rely on a community of researchers and practitioners dealing with similar (testing and research) problems?

  16. The Onelab Vision Provide a facility to the consumer that constitutes a toolkit of methods and abilities by • Building on a proven basis • PlanetLab Europe (PLE) is a working federation of test beds • PlanetLab (PL) provides a proven and evolving platform basis for experimentation • PL has gathered a large community of experimental researchers worldwide to rely on • Building (and federating) actual test beds • Building a toolkit that helps customers in experiments

  17. The federation vision

  18. Need for hierarchical federation ? PLC PLE ANA/Haggle Orbit … ? • Requires • flexible policy framework • a form of economic model PLJ

  19. PLE-PLC federation policy Access rights of PLE researches on PLC nodes Access rights of PLC researches on PLE nodes • Current federation policy: “peering” • Users from both facilities have the same access rights over the whole infrastructure • Both facilities apply the same local policy • But other federation policies are under investigation

  20. Other types of federation policies (PLE-Federica) PLE users are a subset of Federica users A consumer-provider relationship?

  21. PLE-Private PlanetLabs:(Glab, EverLab, Etomics) We may have to constrain access of PLE users to the private PlanetLab.

  22. Facility research challenges • Virtualization: Run concurrent experiments, support services • Monitoring: Collect data and make them available • Legal: Responsibilities and liabilities, IPR, … • Benchmarking: Assessment of the results produced, reproducibility • Security: Robust and secure facility • Economics:Of the facility, for the users, the operators, the federation(s) • Federation • Inter-operability framework • Data and resource representation • Control plane, resource management policies, incentives

  23. OneLab infrastructures • PlanetLab Europe • 118 nodes, 59 sites, 20 countries, 318 registered users, 65 active slices • Based on PlanetLab: • +1000 nodes, 487 sites, 41 countries, 5030 registered users, 630 active slices • Growth 100 nodes per year • New components • WiFi links • Emulated links (Dummynet boxes) • NITOS • WiFi testbed, 23 nodes, OMF based • Open to the Onelab2 partners • Low level driver programming

  24. Operational offering in 1.5 year • Access to SAC testbeds • SAC cloud composed of mobile devices, incl. GPS • ANA, Haggle, DTNRG • Access to Wireless testbeds • All based on OMF • WiFi, WiMax, Mesh • Open source wireless testbed toolkit • Access to Computing Clusters • Everlab: 6 clusters, 89 hosts, 265 CPUs • Access to other testbeds • Slice-Based facility Architecture (SFA) • FEDERICA, Glab • New Components • Emulation, Monitoring

  25. Wrap-up • FIRE is a concept • Experimentally-driven, multidisciplinary, FI research • Modular, dynamically developing supporting facility • OneLab approach • Proven model for federation • Research and innovation incubator • Existing entity to get connected Alone Network power

  26. Thankyou! • Web-site: www.ict-fireworks.eu • Susanna Avéssta susanna.avessta@dimes.fi • Serge Fdida serge.fdida@lip6.fr • Anastasius Gavras gavras@eurescom.eu

More Related