1 / 8

EBSCO and ProQuest in eIFL Countries

EBSCO and ProQuest in eIFL Countries. Paper prepared by Biljana Kosanovic and KoBSON Full-text at: www.eifl.net Members only area information sharing Reports, Studies & Articles. Method. analysis at the individual journal title level

callum-gill
Télécharger la présentation

EBSCO and ProQuest in eIFL Countries

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. EBSCO and ProQuest in eIFL Countries Paper prepared by Biljana Kosanovic and KoBSON Full-text at: www.eifl.net Members only area information sharing Reports, Studies & Articles

  2. Method • analysis at the individual journal title level • citation analysis as the objective method of judging the quality of journals (JCR) • journal title lists provided by aggregators on April, 2003 • only full-text journals with ISSN • aggregators abbreviated journal titles in their own way • eg. ISSN 0896-7385 we found three titles: (1) Cancer Biotechnology Weekly (2) Cancer Weekly (3) Cancer Weekly Plus

  3. Contents: sub-databases

  4. Facts about contents…

  5. Common contents EBSCO ProQuest 940 4828 unique titles 705 unique titles

  6. Facts about contents

  7. Conclusion • EBSCO's package: • expanded their offer • move to STM content • ProQuest package: • less number of titles but more significant content • high number of Social Science journals

  8. Compare vendors • Selection of e-resources • Selection of content • Evaluation of content • Providing coordinators with an interface to all information resources (journals) • Database being considered

More Related