1 / 11

S519: Evaluation of Information Systems

S519: Evaluation of Information Systems. Meta-evaluation D-Ch11. Meta-evaluation. It is evaluation of an evaluation (Scriven, 1991) to determin the quality and/or value of an evaluation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evaluation#cite_note-7. Five criteria. Validity Utility Conduct

cammack
Télécharger la présentation

S519: Evaluation of Information Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. S519: Evaluation of Information Systems Meta-evaluation D-Ch11

  2. Meta-evaluation • It is evaluation of an evaluation (Scriven, 1991) to determin the quality and/or value of an evaluation • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evaluation#cite_note-7

  3. Five criteria • Validity • Utility • Conduct • Credibility • Costs

  4. Validity • To what extent, the conclusions of the evaluation are justified • Check carefully the facts they use and values they assign • Question everything • Constraints (budget, time, etc.) • Using KEC checkpoints • Using standards (http://www.eval.org/Publications/GuidingPrinciples.asp)

  5. Validity • Covers all relevant sources of value • Comprehensively covers process, outcome and cost • Include no irrelevant or illicit criteria • Data used to directly address the criteria • Include analyses that are appropriate for the data • Clearly states how data are interpreted • Is clear about where evaluative conclusions come from • Include valid recommendation

  6. Utility • Are the findings • Relevant to the questions or decisions being faced by the audience • Timely • Clearly communicated • Cost effective

  7. Conduct • Legal • Ethical • Professional standards • Cultrual appropriateness • Unobtrusiveness • Minimal disruptive to the evaluand

  8. Credibility • Familiar with the context • Independence, impartiality, and/or lack of conflict of interest • Expertise in evaluation and in the evaluation subject field

  9. Cost • How reasonable the costs of an evaluation

  10. Meta-evaluation rating table • Table 11.1

  11. Exercise • D-p217, exercise 2 • Form a pair, do the evaluation • Form a group to select the best result, • Design a poster • Present them in a poster • Using three sentenses to summarize your evaluation • What you learn • What you feel • How to improve

More Related