1 / 20

Climate Change, Arctic Plant Communities and Nutrient Feedbacks

Climate Change, Arctic Plant Communities and Nutrient Feedbacks. Rebecca Hale Biogeochemistry of Northern Ecosystems 20 April 2005. A glimpse of things to come…. Global warming (!) has a disproportionate effect on Arctic ecosystems Effects of climate change on tundra ecosystems?

carter
Télécharger la présentation

Climate Change, Arctic Plant Communities and Nutrient Feedbacks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Climate Change, Arctic Plant Communities and Nutrient Feedbacks Rebecca Hale Biogeochemistry of Northern Ecosystems 20 April 2005

  2. A glimpse of things to come… • Global warming (!) has a disproportionate effect on Arctic ecosystems • Effects of climate change on tundra ecosystems? • Change in plant community composition • Changes in plant physiology, structure, function • Effects of plant change? • A work in progress…thinking about effects on nitrogen cycling

  3. Climate change in the Arctic! • Temperature • 2-3ºC increase in Arctic since 1960’s/70’s • Direct effect on plants • Indirect effects • permafrost thawing, increased active soil depth • extended growing season • soil warming and changes in soil processes (i.e. decomposition, N-mineralization)

  4. Changes in N Cycling • N deposition • indirect effects due to warming and CO2 • increased N mineralization • altered C:N ratios and associated changes in decomposition rates • indirect effects due to plant community and physiology changes • changes in litter decomposition • changes due to altered water regime

  5. Welcome to the Tundra • plant growth is 1° nutrient limited • most biomass in below ground plant parts (stems, rhizomes, storage tissue) • controls over plant community composition change across environmental gradient • lower tundra - biotic and abiotic controls (higher biomass = more competition) • higher tundra - become gradually more abiotic, very little competition

  6. Arctic Plants tussock tundra

  7. shrub tundra

  8. Methods • remote sensing • different scales spatially and temporally – tell us different things • historic aerial photographs – small spatial, large temporal scale • satellites – lots of them, fall all over the spatial/temporal scale spectrum • paleoclimatic records • global warming in Holocene – what was the change in plant community composition then? • Modeling • experimental manipulations • control changes over the past years in plant community compositional changes and physiological changes have often been in agreement with experimental and modeling results

  9. Changes in Plant Community[the abridged version] • decreased biodiversity, loss of lichens and mosses • Chapin et al. (1995): 30-50% decline in species richness in tussock after 9 yr warming exp. (loss of forbs and mosses) • Jonasson et al. (1991): loss of diversity in lichens and mosses with 3 yr fertilization

  10. Shrubs! • increase in evergreen and deciduous shrub abundance and biomass with warming and fertilization • Betula nana increased from 25% to >90% tussock tundra biomass after 15 years fertilization • Paleoclimatic methods corroborate these results • early Holocene warming – shrub invasions in Alaska arctic • increased shrub growth and development • short term versus long term results • Hartley et al (1999) soil warming increases shoot production

  11. Shrubs Part II • increased shrub growth and development • short term versus long term results • Hartley et al (1999): soil warming increases shoot production after 3 years, but had no effect after 5 years

  12. Betula nana dwarf birch Arctic willow

  13. Viccinium uliginosum Alpine bilberry Alnus crispa Green alder

  14. Why?!?!? • loss of lichen/moss abundance • competition with vascular plants • light • nitrogen • negative response to N fertilization • response to acid rain, increased T, decreased snow cover, increased CO2, altered fire regimes are other possibilities for lichen loss

  15. Plant Composition • warming • increased growing season (up to 7 days earlier) is correlated with increased photosynthetically active period • modeling results versus field results • increased N mineralization/soil fertility • fertilization experiments have caused changes in plant community composition – are these experiments realistic? • increased N min has been demonstrated in field control plots, but increases in experimental warming plots have been small and variable

  16. Still to come: so what? • what are the effects of these compositional changes on ecosystem functions? • Nutrient partitioning • differentiation in timing, depth and chemical form of N uptake in arctic tundra • dominant species use the most available forms of N • how will this be affected by increased abundance of dominant and loss of rarer species?

  17. effects of plant communities on soil processes and fertility • lichens/mosses – large role in maintaining soil moisture • increased transpiration with increased shrub abundance • changes in litter quality with change in dominant species

More Related