1 / 17

Digital Modulation

Digital Modulation. Better performance and more cost effective than analog modulation methods (AM, FM, etc.) Used in 2 nd generation (2G) cellular systems in U.S. from 1998 - present AT&T Wireless, Verizon Wireless, Sprint, T-mobile, Cingular (now AT&T), Nextel (now Sprint), etc.

casta
Télécharger la présentation

Digital Modulation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Digital Modulation • Better performance and more cost effective than analog modulation methods (AM, FM, etc.) • Used in 2nd generation (2G) cellular systems in U.S. from 1998 - present • AT&T Wireless, Verizon Wireless, Sprint, T-mobile, Cingular (now AT&T), Nextel (now Sprint), etc. • Advancements in VLSI, DSP, ASICs, etc. have made digital solutions practical and affordable ECE 4730: Lecture #12

  2. Digital Modulation • Performance advantages: 1) Resistant to noise, fading, & interference 2) Combine multiple information types (voice, data, & video) in single transmission channel 3) Improved security (e.g. encryption)  deters phone cloning + eavesdropping 4) Error coding to detect/correct transmission errors 5) Signal conditioning to combat hostile MRC environment 6) Implement mod/dem functions using DSP software ECE 4730: Lecture #12

  3. Digital Modulation Performance • Many types of digital modulation methods  subtle differences • How to choose appropriate method?? • Performance factors to consider 1) Low Bit Error Rate (BER) at low SNR  power efficiency 2) Resistance to interference (ACI & CCI) & fading 3) Occupies minimum amount of BW  spectral efficiency 4) Easy and cheap to implement  mobile unit 5) Efficient use of battery power  mobile unit ECE 4730: Lecture #12

  4. Digital Modulation Performance • Power Efficiency p • Ability of modulation technique to preserve quality of digital message at low power levels (low SNR) • Specified as Eb/No @ some BER (e.g. 10-5) where • Eb : energy/bit and No : noise energy/bit • Tradeoff between signal power vs. signal quality  BER  as Eb / No • **Note that this is NOT related to DC/RF efficiency of Tx power amplifier** ECE 4730: Lecture #12

  5. Digital Modulation Performance • Bandwidth Efficiency B • Ability of modulation technique to accommodate data in a limited BW • Tradeoff between data rate (R) and occupied BW • BW  as R • Symbol Period = Ts • Signal BW = Bs1 / Ts R ECE 4730: Lecture #12

  6. PSD  . . . f 1 / Ts = FNBW 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 Symbol Period = Ts Signal BW = Bs1 / Ts Digital Modulation Performance • For a digital signal : • Each pulse or “symbol” having mfinite states represents n = log2m bits/symbol  e.g. m = 0 or 1 (2 states) n = 1 bit/symbol ECE 4730: Lecture #12

  7. Digital Modulation Performance • Maximum BW efficiency  Shannon’s Theorem C: channel capacity (bps) B : RF BW • Note that CB (expected) but also C S/N unexpected?? • Increase in signal power translates to increase in channel capacity!! • Large S/N easier to differentiate between multiple signal states (m) in one symbol n • is fundamental limit that cannot be achieved in practice  typically only 4060% is realizable where ECE 4730: Lecture #12

  8. Digital Modulation Performance • Fundamental tradeoff between pand B (in general) • If p then B (or vice versa) • Example: add error control bits to data stream and keep same data rate • Ts so Bs so B … but error bits will allow lower Eb / No for same BER so p • Is p vs. Btradeoff worth it?? • Use other factors to evaluate  complexity, resistance to MRC impairments, etc. ECE 4730: Lecture #12

  9. 1 B’ 0.5 f fc B” B”’ Signal Bandwidth • Many definitions depending on application • All use Power Spectral Density (PSD) of modulated bandpass signal • FCC definition of occupied BW  BW contains 99% of signal power B’ : half-power (3 dB) BW B” : null-to-null BW B’” : absolute BW range where PSD > 0 ECE 4730: Lecture #12

  10. Tb 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 Tb 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Line Coding • Different types of coding used for baseband digital signals • Choice depends on desired spectral properties • Unipolar  0 or V • Bipolar V or V • Non Return to Zero (NRZ) • Return to Zero (RZ) ECE 4730: Lecture #12

  11. PSD Tb V 0 1 1 0 f . . . Rb = 1 / Tb Line Coding • Unipolar NRZ • Advantage : narrow spectral width • Disadvantage : large DC component  data can’t be passed thru circuits that block DC (e.g. phone line!) • Disadvantage : no zero return  hard to synchronize (decoding errors) ECE 4730: Lecture #12

  12. PSD Tb V 0 . . . 1 0 1 f 2Rb = 2 / Tb Line Coding • Unipolar RZ • Disadvantage : wide spectral width • Advantage : smaller DC component • Advantage : better synchronization  easier to decode ECE 4730: Lecture #12

  13. PSD Tb +V 0 V V f 1 0 1 0 Rb 0.7Rb Line Coding • Manchester NRZ • Advantage : zero DC component • Advantage : zero crossing  excellent synchronization • Moderate spectral width ECE 4730: Lecture #12

  14. MRC Pulse Shaping • Rectangular pulses passed thru bandlimited channel (MRC) • Symbols smear into adjacent time slots • Inter-Symbol Interference (ISI) • Increases probability that symbol error will occur 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 ECE 4730: Lecture #12

  15. Pulse Shaping • Spectral shaping of digital pulses done at baseband • Reduce ISI due to pulse smearing • Reduce spectral width of signal • Improve BW efficiency • Achieve better control of ACI! • Nyquist Criterion • Design overall response of system (Tx + MRC + Rx) so at every sampling instant in Rx (0/1 decision point) the response of all other symbols is zero • Leads to ideal “brick wall” filter in frequency domain ECE 4730: Lecture #12

  16. Heff (f) f Pulse Shaping • Ideal Brick Wall Filter • In Time Domain -B +B ECE 4730: Lecture #12

  17. Pulse Shaping • Ideal brick wall filter in frequency domain and unlimited time domain pulse response cannot be achieved in practice • Other filters can satisfy the Nyquist criterion • Raised Cosine (RC) Filter • Other pulse shaping filters can also be used that do NOT satisfy Nyquist criterion • Gaussian Filter ECE 4730: Lecture #12

More Related