1 / 14

The Neural Correlates of Religious and Nonreligious Belief

The Neural Correlates of Religious and Nonreligious Belief. author, philosopher, public intellectual, and neuroscientist. What is different?. Methods-Subjects. 54 subjects screened via telephone questionnaire Screened for Age (18-30) Psychological Health Christians Vs. Non-Believers

catori
Télécharger la présentation

The Neural Correlates of Religious and Nonreligious Belief

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Neural Correlates of Religious and NonreligiousBelief

  2. author, philosopher, public intellectual, and neuroscientist

  3. What is different?

  4. Methods-Subjects • 54 subjects screened via telephone questionnaire • Screened for • Age (18-30) • Psychological Health • Christians Vs. Non-Believers • Later psychological assessment excluded 13 subjects • 41 subjects went through Fmri (21 non-believers, 20 believers)

  5. Methods- Subjects • 10 additional subjects were excluded due to FMRI difficulties (2), gender balance (1) and inconsistency in response (one previously screened non-believer actually agreed with 43% of religious statements once under the machine) • Final exclusion left 30 subjects (15 Christians, 15 non-believers 8 women and 7 men in each group)

  6. Methods-Experimental Design • Subjects viewed statements and evaluated whether they were true or false • Statements were produced in groups of four; true or false, religious or non-religious • The biblical god really exists (true religious, false non-religious) • The biblical god is a myth (true non-religious, false religious) • Santa Clause is a myth (true both groups) • Santa Clause really exists (false both groups) • Statements were pre-tested via internet

  7. Results • Response times were longer for false responses (3.95s) to (3.70s) in all subjects • Response times were longer for religious (3.99s) stimuli then for non-religious stimuli (3.66s) • Both groups quicker to respond to truth, but the effect of truth was much greater on nonbelievers responding to religious stimuli

  8. Results cont. • Both groups showed greater activation in the VMPFC for statements associated with belief • Greater signal also found in left superior frontal gyrus and both lateral occipital cortices • When comparing belief minus disbelief signal changes were found in all groups on all levels

  9. Belief Vs. Disbelief

  10. Results Cont. • When comparing religious vs non-religious stimuli greater activation was found in the anterior insula, ventral striatum and anterior cingulate cortex • Non-religious stimuli showed increased activation in areas of the left hemisphere including the hippocampus, parahippocampalgyrus, middle temporal gyrus, temporal pole, and retrosplenial cortex

  11. Religious Vs. Non-Religious Stimuli

  12. Discussion • Core finding: • Content-independent difference in activated region of the brain • Religious thinking is more associated with brain regions that govern emotion, self-representation, and cognitive conflict, while thinking about ordinary facts is more reliant upon memory retrieval networks • Ideas for future research? • Study using sports fans • Different groups, kids with religious parents vs. kids with atheist parents • Limitations?

  13. Haidt • Back to chapter 2 • The new Atheists argue for the platonic rationalist model • Haidt likes the Humean model • Do the results of this study support the Platonic rationalist view (horse and chariotte) or the humean view(the rider and the elephant)?

More Related