1 / 9

Components of the Vision: Australian & European Perspectives on Land Administration Systems

Explore the Australian and European perspectives on land administration systems and their impact on sustainable development. Discuss the lessons learned and the future of LAS in both regions.

cevallos
Télécharger la présentation

Components of the Vision: Australian & European Perspectives on Land Administration Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Day: Thursday 10th November • Session: 14.30am - 15.30 • Coordinators: Ian Williamson & Stig Enemark • Topic: Components of the vision- break out groups

  2. Welcome & Research Vision Presentations - European Perspective of Paradigm Australian Group Coordinator: Stig Enemark Rapporteur: Steve Jacoby European Group Coordinator: Ian Williamson Rapporteur: Paul van der Molen Evaluate – Components of the vision Report Back - DiscussionEuropean Lessons Learnt Day 1 – Wednesday Nov 9th

  3. Presentations - Australian Perspective of Paradigm Australian Group Coordinator: Stig Enemark Rapporteur: Grahame Searle European Group Coordinator: Ian Williamson Rapporteur: Daniel Steudler Evaluate – Components of the vision Report Back - DiscussionAustralian Lessons Learnt Day 2 – Thursday Nov 10th

  4. Day 3 – Friday Nov 11th Presentation – Spatially Enabling Government Evaluate – Issues in Designing a New Generation of LAS Group 1 (based on Australian & European Perspectives) Rapporteur: Warwick Watkins Group 2 (based on Australian & European Perspectives) Rapporteur: Holger Magel Report Back - Discussion Final Presentation Next Generation of LAS Ian Williamson, Stig Enemark, Jude Wallace

  5. Key take home messages (1) • Sustainability is embedded within the culture – European owner has a different attitude towards land • Australia relies to much on regulation through Government to achieve sustainability • Current Australian LAS do not fully support sustainable development • Need much more disclosure and transparency of RRR and the current recording systems are not providing this – need to make a decision regarding recording these or not recording these in the register • Providing the correct information to policy and decision makers at all levels

  6. Key take home messages (2) • Current LAS system of cadastre and land registry are focussed on the Land Market • Does not provide relevant and sufficient information for sustainable development as a parcel based paradigm can constrain thinking about sustainable development BUT • Spatially enabled cadastre is the key to meeting sustainable development as you must relate back to the owner • LAS need to cater and build in behaviour elements of people – LAS need to represent the values of the community – when designing changes to LAS, what is the behavioural change we are trying to implement • Unbundling of rights – need to make sure that this does not threaten sustainability

  7. Lessons Learnt (1) • Has the approach been appropriate – straw man – paradigm • This approach was helpful • It created enough confusion to have a fruitful discussion • Overseas experience to the discussion was critical to success • Like to have seen more time for discussion and interaction after each presentation • Having papers developed before hand was good. • Want a CD of papers and presentations

  8. Future (1) • Register of restrictions – topic is vital as it is critical to the sustainability aspect of LAS – work needs to feed in and impact on the way we build systems • Network of people who should be used as a reference group to provide advice to and receive advice from • More interdepartmental and inter-profession interaction is important • But how do we do this?? • Involve others – users, other professionals, • Land registrars in Australia embrace collaborative change in the broad sustainability debate, however in Europe there does not appear to be the same degree of interaction and understanding • To further Land Administration work will require similar strong interaction between academic, professional and governmental structures – especially in all stages of development activity

  9. Future (2) • Local government engagement continues to be a problem that must be addressed • Original broad topic has enabled key issues to be identified – many of these need to be explored in a more defined process, rather than in a broad approach • Semantics and definitional issues need greater clarity if external stakeholders are to be engaged and to advance the process and application of our knowledge • Before this work is taken to government it needs to be road tested with the broad stakeholders • Government needs to understand the impact and scope of the effect of the RRR • Raise the importance of the debate at ministerial level through a ministerial council of land ministers

More Related