1 / 10

UrQMD vs RQMD and FLINT data

UrQMD vs RQMD and FLINT data. Sergey Kiselev , ITEP Introduction Input info Multiplicity of participants γ spectra γ spectra in the set-up θ spectra in the set-up slope parameter p 0 Summary. Introduction. RQMD4.12 generator 2 10 7 C+Be min.bias events at T/A=3.2 GeV

chadrick-cloudy
Télécharger la présentation

UrQMD vs RQMD and FLINT data

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. UrQMD vs RQMD and FLINT data Sergey Kiselev, ITEP Introduction Input info Multiplicity of participants γ spectra γ spectra in the set-up θ spectra in the set-up slope parameter p0 Summary ITEP S.Kiselev

  2. Introduction RQMD4.12 generator 2 107 C+Be min.bias events at T/A=3.2 GeV - set-up θ = 550 - 730 - γ spectrum has a kink at pt = 1.1 GeV/c - γ spectrum drops sharply at pt = 1.6 GeV/c  other generator is needed,  UrQMD ? ITEP S.Kiselev

  3. Input info • C+Be min.bias (b<4.8 fm) at T/A=3.2 GeV • UrQMD1.3 generator: 107events • RQMD4.12 generator: 2 107 events • FLINT data, set-up θ = 550 - 730 ITEP S.Kiselev

  4. Multiplicity of participants, 106 ev. Part of events with participants: UrQMD – 86% RQMD – 83% Baryon charge of participants: UrQMD – 9.8 RQMD – 8.6 ~ 5 particles per event ~ 40 particles per event UrQMD: larger mean and RMS, but the same per participant ITEP S.Kiselev

  5. Multiplicity of species , 106 ev. GEANT codes 1. γ 16. KS 2. e+ 17. η 3. e- 18. Λ 4. ν 19. Σ+ 5. µ+ 20. Σ0 6. µ- 21. Σ- 7. π 22. Ξ0 8. π + 23. Ξ- 9. π - 24. Ω- 10. KL 25. n 11. K+ 26. Λ 12. K- 27. Σ+ 13. n 28. Σ0 14. p+ 29. Σ- 15. p- 30. Ξ0 34. ϕ - - - - - - ITEP S.Kiselev

  6. Spectra of γ, 107 events UrQMD: smaller <θ>, larger <p> ITEP S.Kiselev

  7. p spectra of γ in the set-up,107 ev. UrQMD: no a kink at p = 1.1 GeV/c 4 times larger γ at 1.2 GeV/c ITEP S.Kiselev

  8. θ spectra of γ in the set-up ITEP S.Kiselev

  9. slope parameter p0 for fit by exp(-p/ p0) p0 (data) > p0 (UrQMD) ITEP S.Kiselev

  10. Summary • UrQMD1.3 vs RQMD and FLINT data • UrQMD: no a kink at p = 1.1 GeV/c ~ 4 times larger γ at 1.2 GeV/c • p0 (data) > p0 (UrQMD) ITEP S.Kiselev

More Related