1 / 25

McGill Tomorrow Strategies, Plans and Compacts: Where we are and where we are going

The Faculty of Arts: Today, Tomorrow and Yesterday Faculty of Arts Retreat 2007 Thursday, 7 June 2007. McGill Tomorrow Strategies, Plans and Compacts: Where we are and where we are going. Laura R. Winer, Ph.D. Executive Director Office of the Provost.

Télécharger la présentation

McGill Tomorrow Strategies, Plans and Compacts: Where we are and where we are going

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Faculty of Arts: Today, Tomorrow and Yesterday Faculty of Arts Retreat 2007 Thursday, 7 June 2007 McGill TomorrowStrategies, Plans and Compacts: Where we are and where we are going Laura R. Winer, Ph.D. Executive Director Office of the Provost

  2. General principles underlying strategic planning activities • planning • objective, flexible, and adaptive • assumptions • realistic, sensitive to contexts • goals • attainable and sustainable over several years • allocations • coherent processes and transparent distributions • results • measurable • appropriate and agreed upon indicators • selected peer institutions

  3. General principles (cont’d): McGill’s “i’s” • identity • international • inquiry-based • interdisciplinary • innovation • infrastructure • integrity

  4. General principles (cont’d) • academic priorities are the drivers; resource allocations should be aligned with prioritised academic goals • strategic statements: The White Paper; the Principal’s Task Force on Student Life and Learning, the Master Plan • operational compacts (budgets and other resource allocations)

  5. General principles (cont’d) • tools are needed to fund new initiatives and priorities • resource generation mechanisms • internal reallocations also at the unit level

  6. General principles (cont’d): Budget planning decisions • means of helping responsible, authoritative, accountable individuals to take decisions • not a mechanical substitute for good judgment, political wisdom, and leadership of those who must take decisions • reasoned approach to decisions; i.e., “quantified common sense”

  7. Plans and compacts • development of a regular cycle of implementation, evaluation, and adjustment across the University • multiyear budgeting driven by academic priorities • yearly operational budget compacts • alignment of all resource allocations to strategic priorities

  8. What is a compact? • within the new multiyear framework, annual operating funds must still be allocated • compacts reflect academic priorities that can be funded to meet a Faculty’s goals and objectives • “academic renewal” in all of its aspects • University-wide and Faculty-specific allocations • expressions vary Faculty by Faculty

  9. Significant actions and programs • Academic renewal • Student life and learning • Graduate student funding • Master Plan • Comprehensive campaign • Sustainability • Staff development • Effective organisational practices

  10. Goals, objectives, and strategies developed in the “white paper” • McGill will consistently rank among the top 10 publicly-funded, research-intensive, student-centred universities worldwide • in selected areas our performance will unambiguously position the University among the world leaders • implement the plan over the next 5 years

  11. 1. academic renewal plan • CRC’s for external recruitment, internal McGill-Dawson programme, and endowed chairs • transition help for families • mentorship, start-ups, CFI • academic salary policy and benefits • NTT issues

  12. Arts specifics • continue program reviews with special examination of: • Programs with small enrolments (i.e., undergrad majors <100) • Enrolment and resource planning for BA&Sc programs • U0 • integration of aspects of aboriginal studies, comparative nationalism and diverse sexualities within existing programs • program issues: • enhance internship program • potential minor with Law for European Studies • Masters in Marriage and Family Therapy • vision for developments for offerings for First Nations and Inuit communities

  13. Arts specifics, cont’d • workload issues • assessment of field studies activities on teaching loads • manage course offerings requested by other Faculties • structural issues • languages, literature and culture

  14. Arts specifics, cont’d • moving to target complement for the Faculty • 266.8 TT; target TT complement is 279.3 • Academic renewal plans for MSE with Arts & Science; explore other Faculties—Engineering? Law? • operating budgets • increase operating budget • diversify sources of revenue

  15. 2. enriched student life experience • targeted growth in specific undergraduate programmes • residential life experiences • fee increases and increased student financial aid • academic advising • research-informed teaching and learning • international experiences • implementation of the recommendations of the Principal’s task force on student life and learning

  16. Arts undergraduate students • 2006 fall UG enrolment: • Arts: 6,523 (4,288 women, 2,235 men) • Arts & Science: 212 (149 women, 63 men) • goal: stable undergraduate enrolment

  17. 3. improved graduate studies environment • increase numbers of graduate students in research programmes • improve the quality of their experiences • increase completion rates and reduce time to completion

  18. Arts graduate students • Arts will work to: • Increase graduate FTEs to combined 450 MA and PhD

  19. 4. foundational disciplines and inter-disciplinary developments • centres, institutes, and other structures, with shared infrastructure platforms, equipment, networks, and technology • cognitive, biological, and behavioural neurosciences, including pain • public and social policy, including health and society • environmental sciences and studies • computation, statistical inference and modelling • nano-sciences, nanotechnology, and advanced materials • integrative systems biology • languages, literatures, and cultures • develop other directions where McGill can become a leader

  20. Arts partnerships to develop • with research centres: • McGill Institute for the Study of Canada • Institute for Health and Social Policy • Social Statistics • Book Project • Making Publics • Centre for Research on Religion • European Studies (Law) • Quantitative Economics (UdeM) • Letters and traditions (Laval) • Diversity in Quebec (UQAM) • Human Development (Concordia) • develop other directions where McGill can become a leader

  21. 5. highest quality service from all support areas • library • information, service, and innovation • information system and technology • teaching, learning, and research efforts • highest quality of service • avoidance of costly duplication • major projects • facilities developments • renovations to modernise existing laboratory, classroom and museum spaces • integrate that thinking into Master Plan

  22. 6. professional development • mechanisms leading to: • enhanced productivity • improved job satisfaction • make McGill one of the top university employers in Canada

  23. 7. internal performance indicators and benchmarking against selected peer institutions • Faculties, departments, centres, institutes, programs • internal goal setting • comparison of data for selected indicators • “standard” institutions are G13, AAU ( 9 better funded and 9 empirical peers), U21

  24. Decision-making processes • interplay between “centralisation” and “de-centralisation” • aspects of the way McGill must and has chosen to do its business have changed dramatically • the University expects more from Faculties • Faculties have been given more resources and broader mandates • Deans have to make decisions • tough, sometimes unpopular ones • aggressive re-purposing of space and human infrastructure

  25. Questions? • Comments? • Suggestions? • Criticisms? • Concerns? • Complaints?

More Related