1 / 13

Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519 (1978)

Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519 (1978). Strategic Delay in Derailing Public Policy. The Historical Context. This was decided in 1978 The Warren court first reformed criminal due process. It next applied its individual rights jurisprudence to administrative law

charisma-spino
Télécharger la présentation

Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519 (1978)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519 (1978) Strategic Delay in Derailing Public Policy

  2. The Historical Context • This was decided in 1978 • The Warren court first reformed criminal due process. • It next applied its individual rights jurisprudence to administrative law • Searches, juvenile justice, welfare rights • The last decision was Goldberg v. Kelly in 1970 • The federal circuit's 1960s-70s jurisprudence on agency rulemaking is a reflection of the Warren Court's views of government power.

  3. Modern Administrative Law • The story of Adlaw post-1970 is the limitation of individual liberties in favor of efficient government. • The DC Circuit was still in the Warren Court era when this case was decided. • Why was the lower court suspicious of agency rulemaking in this case? • What did it want to require to provide greater public protections?

  4. Nuclear Power Plant Regulation • Originally regulated by the Atomic Energy Commission • Regulated and promoted nuclear power • Regulation was split off to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission because of conflicts of interest • Environmental impact analysis was added through NEPA after the initial permitting of this plant. • Greatly complicates permitting.

  5. The Permit History for Vermont Yankee • Permitting is an adjudication • Specific party, specific facts • The agency makes a decision as to whether it will grant the permit. • In 1967 Vermont Yankee is granted a construction permit. • In 1971, post-NEPA, it applies for an operating permit. • Why is it politically difficult to deny an operating permit?

  6. The Permit Fight • Who is the NRDC? • Why does it oppose the operating permit? • The EIS • Because of NEPA, the NRC must prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) • The adjudication must deal with problems with the EIS, and the sufficiency of the EIS can be challenged in court. • This the vehicle for a lot of environmental litigation.

  7. NuclearWaste and the EIS • Why is nuclear waste disposal a big issue for NEPA? • Does the NRC or the nuclear industry have a good solution in 1971? • What would this mean about the completeness of the EIS? • Why does the NRDC want the agency to explain in the EIS about the long term environmental impact of the reactor?

  8. Avoiding the Issue • What does the NRC do to avoid making this a subject of the hearing? • Why does it not want this discussed in the public hearing? • How will making a rule on waste disposal remove it from the hearing process? • Classic narrowing of adjudication issues by rulemaking

  9. The Rulemaking • What were the two alternatives in the proposed rulemaking? • What additional process was provided beyond the usual APA notice and comment? • Were there limits on the public participation? • Which alternative did the NRC adopt after the public comment? • Why is the NRDC unhappy with this alternative? • Why did they want the rulemaking reopened?

  10. DC Circuit • What does the DC circuit want the NRC to do to improve the due process in their rulemaking? • Is this required by the APA? • What is the lower court's theory about the APA requirements? • Floor or ceiling? • Who does the court think should decide on the appropriate procedures?

  11. The Substantive Issue • What is the DC court's real problem with the rulemaking on waste management? • What is the NRC’s plan? • What sort of technology does it depend on? • We are 35+ years latter - who was right about the technology?

  12. Energy Conservation • What is the energy conservation issue? • Why is energy conservation a NEPA environmental impact issue? • What event precipitated this concern? • Is it fair to apply to the operating permit for a reactor that has already been built? • Did the lower court accept the agency’s finding on energy conservation?

  13. The United States Supreme Court • What does the United States Supreme Court think about the role of the APA in setting process? • Who gets to make the call - agency or courts? • In the court's view, what is the real issue? • "The fundamental policy questions appropriately resolved in Congress and in the state legislatures are not subject to reexamination in the federal courts under the guise of judicial review of agency action. Time may prove wrong the decision to develop nuclear energy, but it is Congress or the States within their appropriate agencies which must eventually make that judgment. “ • Why is this critical for the political control of agencies?

More Related