1 / 21

SSSL/CAVE Undergraduate Research 5/7/03

SSSL/CAVE Undergraduate Research 5/7/03. AOE 4994 Alternative Methods of Spacecraft Control Using Space Systems Simulation Lab and VT-CAVE Final Presentation by Michael Shoemaker. SSSL/CAVE Undergraduate Research 5/7/03. Organization of presentation. - Introduction

charmaine-efrain
Télécharger la présentation

SSSL/CAVE Undergraduate Research 5/7/03

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SSSL/CAVE Undergraduate Research 5/7/03 AOE 4994 Alternative Methods of Spacecraft Control Using Space Systems Simulation Lab and VT-CAVE Final Presentation by Michael Shoemaker

  2. SSSL/CAVE Undergraduate Research 5/7/03 Organization of presentation - Introduction - Literature review results - CAVE simulation 1: orbit - CAVE simulation 2: fake Whorl1 - CAVE simulation 3: real Whorl1 - Looking ahead - Conclusions

  3. SSSL/CAVE Undergraduate Research 5/7/03 Introduction Overall Goal: - to control the spacecraft simulator(s) from within a Virtual Environment (VE), such as the CAVE. Why? - take advantage of both systems - achieve new results

  4. SSSL/CAVE Undergraduate Research Literature review results Original topics - manual satellite control - CG displays used to control spacecraft - other non-conventional display methods Expanded to include - more than just manual control - other fields besides spacecraft

  5. SSSL/CAVE Undergraduate Research Literature review results

  6. SSSL/CAVE Undergraduate Research Literature review results • Classifications for VEs • - Direct Control:human directly in the loop • - Supervisory Control:human assigns automatic tasks • - Planning:no hardware to control, more like design • - Observation:non-controlling humans get to watch • Lessons learned: • - VEs can use human senses to fill gaps in the system • space systems should be “field” tested as much as possible • VEs not just helpful to users but also to 3rd parties • control system should take advantage of human perception

  7. SSSL/CAVE Undergraduate Research DIVERSE “Rosetta Stone” DIVERSE – long acronym - allows easy development of VE’s for many different display types. - allows neat stuff to be done with I/O devices. DPF – DIVERSE graphics interface to Performer - the graphics part - allows a Performer scene to be displayed as a VE on many different displays types DTK – DIVERSE Tool Kit - the I/O part - makes programming easy for novices like me

  8. SSSL/CAVE Undergraduate Research CAVE simulation 1: orbit Goals: - test Performer capabilities - practice loading files into CAVE - early evaluation of astrodynamics expressed in 3D environment

  9. SSSL/CAVE Undergraduate Research CAVE simulation 2: fake Whorl1 • Goals: • simple Performer model • animate using pre-generated Euler angles • early evaluation of attitude dynamics expressed in 3D environment

  10. MATLAB “W1Driver.m” “RHS.m” SSSL/CAVE Undergraduate Research CAVE simulation 2: fake Whorl1 Whorl1 attitude dynamics

  11. MATLAB “W1Driver.m” DTK “writeEuler.C” “RHS.m” DPF dtkSharedMem “attitude” VT-CAVE or desktopCaveSim “dynCaveSim.C” “attitudeDTKtoDPF.C” dtk-floatSliders “attitude” Performer “refFrame.pfb” “whorl1.pfb” SSSL/CAVE Undergraduate Research MS Windows Local CAVE SGI system “Euler312.txt”

  12. SSSL/CAVE Undergraduate Research CAVE simulation 3: real Whorl1 • Goals: • same Performer model • animate using data from rate gyros • show actual motion of simulator

  13. SSSL/CAVE Undergraduate Research CAVE simulation 3: real Whorl1 • System description: • Whorl1 • Typhon • CAVE • why so much?

  14. SSSL/CAVE Undergraduate Research CAVE simulation 3: real Whorl1

  15. SSSL/CAVE Undergraduate Research CAVE simulation 3: real Whorl1

  16. SSSL/CAVE Undergraduate Research CAVE simulation 3: real Whorl1

  17. SSSL/CAVE Undergraduate Research CAVE simulation 3: real Whorl1

  18. SSSL/CAVE Undergraduate Research CAVE simulation 3: real Whorl1

  19. SSSL/CAVE Undergraduate Research Looking ahead Modify code: - better byte-order fix - fewer programs/shared memory Manipulate Whorl1: - control with thrusters from CAVE - what about constraints?

  20. SSSL/CAVE Undergraduate Research Conclusion Topics covered: - Motivations - Literature Review - Various CAVE simulations, with experiments - Future Ideas

  21. SSSL/CAVE Undergraduate Research References Grunwald, AJ., and Ellis, SR. “Visual Display Aid for Orbital Maneuvering: Design Considerations.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 16, No. 1, Jan-Feb 1993. Grunwald, AJ., and Ellis, SR. “Visual Display Aid for Orbital Maneuvering: Experimental Evaluation.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 16, No. 1, Jan-Feb 1993. Museth, K., et al. “Semi-Immersive Space Mission Design and Visualization: Case Study of the ‘Terrestrial Planet Finder’ Mission.” Proceedings Visualization 2001, IEEE SIGGRPAH, 21-26 Oct, 2001 pp. 501-509. Nguyen, LA., et al. “Virtual Reality Interfaces for Visualization and Control of Remote Vehicles.” Autonomous Robots 11, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 56-68, 2001. Stoker, Carol. “From Antarctica to Space: Use of Telepresence and Virtual Reality in Control of a Remote Underwater Vehicle.” SPIE, Vol. 2352, Mobile Robots IX, pp. 288-299, 1994. Plus many more….

More Related