1 / 8

HISTORY 306

HISTORY 306. PROJECT SYNOPSIS/UPDATE “The Judiciary’s Changing Role In Canadian politics”. Synopsis. Three distinct periods of judicial precedent:. 1949-1982 The Court as Constitutional Arbiter.

chava-snyder
Télécharger la présentation

HISTORY 306

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. HISTORY 306 PROJECT SYNOPSIS/UPDATE “The Judiciary’s Changing Role In Canadian politics”

  2. Synopsis Three distinct periods of judicial precedent:

  3. 1949-1982The Court as Constitutional Arbiter • Primary role as interpreter of Constitutional division of powers between the provinces and the Federal Government. • Citation: Sections 91/92 of Constitution • Citation: Judicial decision regarding federal/provincial liquor licensing conflict • Citation: Supreme Court reference re: constitutional amendment

  4. 1982-1992The Court as Rights Arbiter • Role of the court changes to incorporate new Constitutional space for individual rights. • Citation: Example: Free Expression Rulings regarding tobacco advertising and Bill 101 • Relationship between judicial and legislative branches becomes a dialogue • Citation: Charter document – Focus on Sec. 1, Sec. 33 • Guarantees Rights “ . . . subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society” (S.1) Effects of “Reasonable Limits Clause” on Speech Legislation • Legislative Oversight: “Parliament or the legislature of a province may expressly declare in an Act of Parliament or of the legislature, as the case may be, that the Act or a provision thereof shall operate notwithstanding a provision included in section 2 or sections 7 to 15 of this Charter.” (S.33) Effects of “Notwithstanding Clause” on Bill 101

  5. Classical Legislative Formula

  6. 1992-2007Activist/Legislator • Post-92 Supremes emphasize new sections of the Charter • Stress placed on Sec. 15 and Sec. 24 • Expansion of Essential Freedoms • Expansion of “Judicial Remedy” • Changing the law, rather than upholding/striking down • Egan v. Canada & Same-Sex Marriage • Expansion of Sec. 15 – “Reading in” and “Un-Enumerated Grounds” • New Brunswick French Schools • Imposition of a legislative time-limit before court changes the law • Emphasis on prescriptive solutions undercuts dialectic relationship between courts and parliament.

  7. The New Legislative Process

  8. The Problematic Balance:

More Related