1 / 37

Magnetic Reconnection in Plasmas; a Celestial Phenomenon in the Laboratory

Magnetic Reconnection in Plasmas; a Celestial Phenomenon in the Laboratory. J Egedal, W Fox, N Katz, A Le, M Porkolab, MIT, PSFC, Cambridge, MA. Outline. The problem of magnetic reconnection Reconnection in the Versatile Toroidal Facility Experimental setup Experimental observation

chavez
Télécharger la présentation

Magnetic Reconnection in Plasmas; a Celestial Phenomenon in the Laboratory

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Magnetic Reconnection in Plasmas; a Celestial Phenomenon in the Laboratory J Egedal, W Fox, N Katz, A Le, M Porkolab, MIT, PSFC, Cambridge, MA

  2. Outline • The problem of magnetic reconnection • Reconnection in the Versatile Toroidal Facility • Experimental setup • Experimental observation • Electron kinetic effects • Wind satellite data from the deep magnetotail • Kinetic effects • The new closed configuration in VTF • Conclusions

  3. The Versatile Toroidal Facility (VTF) 3.5 m

  4. The Versatile Toroidal Facility (VTF)

  5. The Versatile Toroidal Facility (VTF)

  6. A new closed cusp by internal coil. Passing electrons & spontaneous reconnection events. Two different magnetic configurations A open cusp magnetic field. Fast reconnection by trapped electrons. Wind observation Both configurations have Bguide and toroidal symmetry 2d

  7. VTF open configuration plasmashave a trapping potential Open field lines intersect the vessel wall. Electrons stream faster than ions, so plasma charges positive Thermal electrons are electrostatically trapped Typical Parameters: ne ~ 2-3 1016 m-3 Te ~ 12 eV Ti ~ 1 eV Bt ~ 80 mT (800 G) Bc ~ 0-10 mT

  8. Reconnection drive • Electric field induced by • a central solenoid • The solenoid is driven • by an LC circuit • Vloop ~ 100 V

  9. Plasma response to driven reconnection

  10. Electron flow: Experimental potential,  The electrostatic potential  +70 V -70 V

  11. The electrostatic potential  Ideal Plasma: Frozen in law is broken where EB0

  12. The size of the electron diffusion region is J Egedal et al., PRL 90, (2003) The electrostatic potential  Ideal Plasma: δ Frozen in law is broken where EB0 δ (cm) ρcusp

  13. Kinetic modeling(1) • Why is the experimental current density so small? • Liouville/Vlasov’s equation: df/dt=0 • For a given (x0,v0), follow the orbit back in time to x1 • Particle orbits calculated using electrostatic and magnetic fields consistent with the experiment. • Massively parallel code evaluates f(x0,v0) = f(|v1|). Computer Physics Communications , (2004)

  14. Kinetic modeling(2) 0 – 12 kA/m2 • The current is calculated as • Theory consistent with measurements (B-probe resolution: 1.5cm) Theory Experiment

  15. Outline • The problem of magnetic reconnection • Reconnection in the Versatile Toroidal Facility • Experimental setup • Experimental observation • Kinetic effects • Wind satellite data from the deep magnetotail • Kinetic effects • The new closed configuration in VTF • Conclusions

  16. Wind satellite observations in distant magnetotail, 60RE M. Øieroset et al. Nature 412, (2001) M. Øieroset et al. PRL 89, (2002) • Measurements within the ion • diffusion region reveal: • Strong anisotropy in fe.

  17. Wind satellite observations in distant magnetotail, 60RE M. Øieroset et al. Nature 412, (2001) M. Øieroset et al. PRL 89, (2002) • Measurements within the ion • diffusion region reveal: • Strong anisotropy in fe. Log(f)

  18. A trapped electron in the magnetotail The magnetic moment:

  19. No cooling Cooling Drift kinetic modeling of Wind data • From Vlasov’s equation df/dt=0  f(x0,v0) = f(Eexit ) • Two types of orbits: Passing: Trapped : =mv2/(2B)+… is constant

  20. Drift kinetic modeling of Wind data • Applying f(x0,v0) = f(|v1|) to an X-line geometry consistent with the Wind measurements • A potential, needed for trapping at low energies • Ion outflow: 400 km/s, consistent with acceleration in  Theory Wind ~ -1150V ~ -300V ~ -800V Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, (2005) 025006

  21. f(x0,v0) = f(E0-q0), passing = f(B), trapped Drift kinetic modeling of Wind data • Applying f(x0,v0) = f(|v1|) to an X-line geometry consistent with the Wind measurements • A potential, needed for trapping at low energies • Ion outflow: 400 km/s, consistent with acceleration in  Theory Wind ~ -1150V Cluster Obs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, (2005) 025006

  22. Outline • The problem of magnetic reconnection • Reconnection in the Versatile Toroidal Facility • Experimental setup • Experimental observation • Kinetic effects • Wind satellite data from the deep magnetotail • Kinetic effects • The new closed configuration in VTF • Conclusions

  23. New closed magnetic configurations

  24. A new reconnection drive scenario

  25. Spontaneous reconnection Phys. Rev. Lett. 98,(2007) 015003

  26. Sweet-Parker is out, E ≠ *j !

  27. Current channel expelled, J Magnetic energy released Bz R 4 -4 vA ~ 10 km/s c/pi ~ 1m, s ~ 0.12m

  28. d/dt[V] t [µs] Mode at f=50 kHz What Triggers Reconnection? R d/dt [V] R [m] t [µs]

  29. Plasma outflows

  30. Rough energy balance • Magnetic energy released ~ 0.5 × 6 10-6 H × (500A)2 ~ 0.8 J • Electron energization ~ 500 A× 80V × 210-5s ~ 0.8 J • Ion flows: ~ 24 eV × 21018m-3 ×0.06m3 ~ 0.48 J Strong energizations of the ions

  31. Electrostatic (and magnetic) fluctuations observed during reconnection events 800 0 Plasma Current (A) Loop voltage (V) Fluctuation > 10 MHz (au) (off scale) fpe ~ 10 GHz fce ~ 1 GHz f (MHz) Spectrogram fpi ~ 30 MHz fLH ~ 10 MHz 0 t (ms) 1 [Mar 22 shot 405, HPF 80kHz, scope B/W 150 MHz]

  32. Conclusions • Fast, collisionless driven reconnection observed in the open cusp configuration • Classical Coulomb collisions are not important • The width of the diffusion region scales with cusp • Solving Vlasov’s equation (using the measured profiles of E and B) provides current profiles consistent with the VTF measurements; the current is limited by electron trapping. • Wind observations consistent with fast reconnection mediated by trapped electrons • New closed configuration in VTF provides exciting new parameter regimes and boundaries for future study of collisionless magnetic reconnection & the trigger problem.

  33. Thank you for your attention

  34. Future studies with the new configuration • Fast, bursty reconnection with closed boundaries and in the presence of guide magnetic field can be studied (for the first time) • What controls the rate of reconnection? • How is reconnection “triggered” • Huge parameter regime available: Scans possible in Bcusp, Bguide, Te, Ne, Erec. • Spans collisional to collisionless regimes: e = 0.1 – 103 m • High plasma pressure (compared to magnetic field):  ~ 1 • Warm and magnetized ions. • 3D magnetic geometries are easily implemented

  35. Upgrade of open Cusp Fields of new in-vessel coils Existing configuration

  36. Upgrade of open Cusp New total field Ionization region

  37. Reconnection Experiments with a Guide Magnetic Field J Egedal, W Fox, N Katz, A Le and M Porkolab MIT, PSFC, Cambridge, MA

More Related