1 / 34

Three Factor to Four Factor to Five Factor Machines

Three Factor to Four Factor to Five Factor Machines. Ted Mitchell. We Have Expanded Two-Factor Demand Models, Q. Into Three-Factor Models Cups sold, Q = (Cups per hour) x hours, H Cups sold, Q = ( Factor 1 , Q/H) x ( Factor 2 , H) Into

cheche
Télécharger la présentation

Three Factor to Four Factor to Five Factor Machines

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Three Factor to Four Factor to Five Factor Machines Ted Mitchell

  2. We Have Expanded Two-Factor Demand Models, Q • Into Three-Factor Models • Cups sold, Q = (Cups per hour) x hours, HCups sold, Q = (Factor 1, Q/H) x (Factor 2, H)Into • Cups sold, Q =(cups per server) x (servers per hour) x Hours • Cups Sold, Q = (Factor 1, Q/S) x (Factor 2, S/H) x (Factor 3, H)

  3. We have recognized that Demand, Q • Is NOT the only output of marketing machines • Other Outputs Include: • Revenue = Price x Quantity sold • Gross Profit = (Profit per unit) x Quantity sold • Marketing Profit = Gross Profit–Direct Fixed Marketing Expenses • Awareness • Satisfaction • Market Share

  4. Other Two-Factor Models can be expanded as well • 1) Output: Dollars of Sales Revenue, R Revenue, R = (dollar sales per server) x (servers per hour) x number of hoursR = (R/S) x (S/R) x H • 2) Output: Dollars of Gross Profit, GGross Profit, G = (gross profit per server) x (servers per hour) x (number of hours, H)G = (G/S) x (S/H) x H

  5. Consider a Three-Factor Revenue Machine • Revenue, R = (dollar sales per server) x (servers per hour) x (number of hours)R=(Factor 1, R/S)x (Factor 2, S/H)x Factor 3, H) • R = (R/S) (S/H) (H) • It might be useful to expand this Three Factor Revenue Machine to explicitly include the demand or the quantity sold, Q,

  6. The process has three stages • 1) Expand the given model with the variable that is to be made explicit • 2) Aggregate the conversion rate ratios to include the new variable • 3) Decompose the aggregated conversion rate into multiple conversion rates that include the newly explicit variable

  7. Stage 1: Expand • Identify the machine to be expandedRevenue, R = (R/S) x (S/H) x Hours, H • Insert the variable to be made explicit as Unity • (Quantity sold, Q)/(Quantity sold, Q) = Q/Q = 1 • Revenue, R = (R/S) x (S/H) x 1 x Hours, H • Revenue, R = (R/S) x (S/H) x (Q/Q) x Hours, H

  8. Stage 2: Aggregate • The conversion rates • Revenue, R = (R/S) x (S/H) x (Q/Q) x Hours, H • Revenue, R = (RSQ/SHQ) x Hours, H • Conversion rate, r = (RSQ/SHQ) Ugly massive conversion factor

  9. Stage 3: Decompose • The ugly aggregated conversion rate • Revenue, R = (RSQ/SHQ) x Hours, H • Revenue, R = (R/Q) x (Q/S) x (S/H) x Hours, H • whereR/Q = Factor #1 = Revenue per cup (Price) • Q/S = Factor #2 = Cups per server • S/H = Factor #3 = Servers per hour • H = Factor #4 = Input: Operating Hours

  10. Moved from a Three-Factor Demand Machine to a Four-Factor Revenue Machine • Three-Factor Machine with an Output of Demand, Quantity Sold • Quantity Sold, Q = (Cups per server) x (Servers per hour) x Hours, HQuantity Sold, Q = (Q/S) x (S/H) x HInto • Four-Factor Revenue Machine

  11. A Four-Factor Model of Revenue • Revenue, R = (Price, P) x (Q/S) x (S/H) x H • Revenue , R = selling price x cups per server x servers per hour x operating hours • A difference in selling price, ∆P, might help explain some difference in the output of two marketing performances

  12. Creating a Multi-Factor model of the marketing machine • With good explanatory power • Is the first step in comparing one marketing performance to an average performance, to a previous performance, to a target or benchmark performance, to a competitor’s performance. • You need to have an impact analysis to measure the size of differences in the two performances • Impact analysis is the second step

  13. Three things changing resulting in a change in Revenue, ∆R, being produced • 1) The number of hours, H, is different • H1 = 112 hours, H2 = 100 hour • 2) The number of servers, S, is different • S1 = 18 servers, S2 = 20 servers • 3) The quantity sold is different • Q1 = 2,200 cups, Q2 = 2,400

  14. Our focus is on the changing ratios • Of the conversion rates Not the changes in variables • Number of serversper hour (S/H) is different • (S/H)1= 16 servers per 100 hours, (S/H)2= 20 servers per 100 hours • (S/H)1 = 0.16 sph, (S/H)2 = 0.2 sph • The quantity sold per server (Q/S)is different • (Q/S)1= 122.2 qps, (Q/S)2= 120 qps • Revenue per cup or selling price is different • P1 = $4.00 per cup, P2 = $3.80 per cup

  15. Comparing TWO Performances

  16. Comparing TWO Performances

  17. Comparing TWO Performances

  18. Report Comparing TWO Revenue Performances

  19. From the report we conclude • 1) the most important impact to explain differences in the revenues was • Not the Change in Price (average revenue per cup) • Not the Change in Hours • Yes! Was Change In Number of Servers • 2) A 12 hour difference in operating time was more important than the 20¢ difference in price

  20. The more strategic • The Two-Factor Model the greater the opportunity to find significantly important marketing variables to make explicit in the Machine • A Tactical Machine would be • Quantity sold, Q = (Cups per hour) x Hours • A Strategic Machine would be • Gross Profit, G = (Profit per Hour) x Hours

  21. How about a 5 Factor Model? • We identified the possibility of a three factor model to explain Gross Profit, G • Gross Profit, G = (gross profit per server) x (servers per hour) x Hours, H • Gross Profit, G= (G/S) x (S/H) x H • We want to make both Revenue, R, and Quantity Sold, Q, explicit in the model

  22. For a 5 Factor Model • Move from a 3-Factor Model of Gross Profit, G, to a 5-Factor Model • Gross profit, G = (G/S) x (S/H) x H • We insert Revenue, R, and Quantity sold, Q, As unity or (Q/Q) = 1 and (R/R) = 1 • Gross profit, G= (G/S) x (S/H) x 1 x 1 x H • Gross profit, G= (G/S)x(S/H)x (Q/Q) x (R/R) x H

  23. Step 2: Aggregate the conversion rates • Gross profit, G= (G/S)x(S/H)x (Q/Q) x (R/R) x H • Gross profit, G= (GQRS)/SHQR) x H • We have a very large and ugly conversion factor

  24. Step 3: Decompose the large ugly conversion rates • Gross profit, G= (GQRS)/SHQR) x H • Decompose the large ugly conversion factor • Gross Profit, G= (G/R) x (R/Q)x (Q/S) x (S/H) x H • where • G/R = Factor #1 = Gross Return on Sales or Markup on Price, Mp • R/Q = Factor #2 = Revenue per Cup = Price per Cup • Q/S = Factor #3 = Cups Sold per Server • S/H = Factor #4 = Servers per hour • H = Input Factor #5 = Number of Operating Hours

  25. There are thousands of combinations • that the big ugly aggregated conversion factor can be decomposed into • There is an art to decomposition of the big ugly conversion rate into a series of conversion rates that resonate with managers and make sense to executives

  26. A Five Factor Model explaining • Differences in Gross Profit, ∆G = G2-G1 • Due to the differences between the 5-Factors of two different performances • 1) Markup on Price, (P-V)/P • 2) Selling Price, R/Q = P • 3) Cups sold per server, Q/S • 4) Servers working per hour, S/H • 5) Number of hours open, H Could be Very Useful for Diagnostic purposes

  27. For Example, Selling Coffee • Input and Moderating Factors • Hours of Operation = 112 hours • Number of Servers = 18 servers • Cups sold = 2,200 cups • Revenue = $8,800 • Output: Gross Profit = $7,920

  28. Impact Analysis is still used

  29. For Example, Selling Coffee • Benchmark performance • Input and Moderating Factors • Hours of Operation = 100 hours • Number of Servers = 20 servers • Cups sold = 2,400 cups • Revenue = $9,120 • Output: Gross Profit = $8,390

  30. Impact Analysis is still used to explain the difference in the output of the two performances, ∆G = $470

  31. It is obvious that • There is a potential for thousands of different multi-factor marketing machines that could be used for diagnostic purposes • Designing a useful one is part ART and part marketing Science

More Related