1 / 24

Gavin Brennen Lauri Lehman Zhenghan Wang Valcav Zatloukal JKP

Anyonic quantum walks: The Drunken Slalom. Gavin Brennen Lauri Lehman Zhenghan Wang Valcav Zatloukal JKP. Ubergurgl, June 2010. Anyonic Walks: Motivation. Random evolutions of topological structures arise in: Statistical physics (e.g. Potts model ):

chelsi
Télécharger la présentation

Gavin Brennen Lauri Lehman Zhenghan Wang Valcav Zatloukal JKP

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Anyonic quantum walks:The Drunken Slalom Gavin Brennen Lauri Lehman Zhenghan Wang Valcav Zatloukal JKP Ubergurgl, June 2010

  2. Anyonic Walks: Motivation • Random evolutions of topological structures arise in: • Statistical physics (e.g. Potts model): • Entropy of ensembles of extended object • Plasma physics and superconductors: • Vortex dynamics • Polymer physics: • Diffusion of polymer chains • Molecular biology: • DNA folding • Cosmic strings • Kinematic Golden Chain (ladder) Quantum simulation

  3. Bosons Fermions Anyons Anyons • Two dimensional systems • Dynamically trivial (H=0). Only statistics. 3D 2D View anyon as vortex with flux and charge.

  4. Define particles: Define their fusion: Define their braiding: Fusion Hilbert space: Ising Anyon Properties

  5. Assume we can: Create identifiable anyons pair creation Braid anyons Statistical evolution: braid representation B Fuse anyons Ising Anyon Properties time

  6. Approximating Jones Polynomials “trace” Knots (and links) are equivalent to braids with a “trace”. [Markov, Alexander theorems]

  7. Approximating Jones Polynomials “trace” Is it possible to check if two knots are equivalent or not? The Jones polynomial is a topological invariant: if it differs, knots are not equivalent. Exponentially hard to evaluate classically –in general. Applications: DNA reconstruction, statistical physics… [Jones (1985)]

  8. Approximating Jones Polynomials “trace” Take “Trace” With QC polynomially easy to approximate: Simulate the knot with anyonic braiding [Freedman, Kitaev, Wang (2002); Aharonov, Jones, Landau (2005); et al. Glaser (2009)]

  9. Classical Random Walk on a line -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 • Recipe: • Start at the origin • Toss a fair coin: Heads or Tails • Move: Right for Heads or Left for Tails • Repeat steps (2,3) T times • Measure position of walker • Repeat steps (1-5) many times • Probability distribution P(x,T): binomial • Standard deviation:

  10. QW on a line -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 • Recipe: • Start at the origin • Toss a quantum coin (qubit): • Move left and right: • Repeat steps (2,3) T times • Measure position of walker • Repeat steps (1-5) many times • Probability distribution P(x,T):...

  11. QW on a line -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 • Recipe: • Start at the origin • Toss a quantum coin (qubit): • Move left and right: • Repeat steps (2,3) T times • Measure position of walker • Repeat steps (1-5) many times • Probability distribution P(x,T):...

  12. CRW vs QW CRW QW P(x,T) Quantum spread ~T2, classical spread~T [Nayak, Vishwanath, quant-ph/0010117; Ambainis, Bach, Nayak, Vishwanath, Watrous, STOC (2001)]

  13. QW with more coins dim=2 dim=4 Variance =kT2 More (or larger) coins dilute the effect of interference (smaller k) New coin at each step destroys speedup (also decoherence) Variance =kT New coin every two steps? [Brun, Carteret, Ambainis, PRL (2003)]

  14. If walk is time/position independent then it is either: classical (variance ~ kT) or quantum (variance ~ kT2) Decoherence, coin dimension, etc. give no richer structure... Is it possible to have time/position independent walk with variance ~ kTafor 1<a<2? Anyonic quantum walks are promising due to their non-local character. QW vs RW vs ...?

  15. Ising anyons QW QW of an anyon with a coin by braiding it with other anyons of the same type fixed on a line. Evolve with quantum coin to braid with left or right anyon.

  16. Ising anyons QW Evolve in time e.g. 5 steps What is the probability to find the walker at position x after T steps?

  17. Ising anyons QW Hilbert space: P(x,T) involves tracing the coin and anyonic degrees of freedom: • add Kauffman’s bracket of each resulting link (Jones polynomial) • P(x,T), is given in terms of such Kauffman’s brackets: exponentially hard to calculate! large number of paths.

  18. Trace & Kauffman’s brackets Trace (in pictures) TIME

  19. Ising anyons QW A link is proper if the linking between the walk and any other link is even. Non-proper links Kauffman(Ising)=0 Evaluate Kauffman bracket. Repeat for each path of the walk. Walker probability distribution depends on the distribution of links (exponentially many).

  20. Locality and Non-Locality Position distribution, P(x,T): • z(L): sum of successive pairs of right steps • τ(L): sum of Borromean rings Very local characteristic Very non-local characteristic

  21. Ising QW Variance ~T2 Variance ~T step, T The variance appears to be close to the classical RW.

  22. local vs non-local step, T step, T Ising QW Variance Assume z(L) and τ(L) are uncorrelated variables.

  23. Anyonic QW & SU(2)k probability P(x,T=10) index k position, x The probability distribution P(x,T=10) for various k. k=2 (Ising anyons) appears classical k=∞ (fermions) it is quantum k seems to interpolate between these distributions

  24. Conclusions • Possible: quant simulations with FQHE, • p-wave sc, topological insulators...? • Asymptotics: Variance ~ kTa • 1<a<2 Anyons: first possible example • Spreading speed (Grover’s algorithm) • is taken over by • Evaluation of Kauffman’s brackets • (BQP-complete problem) • Simulation of decoherence? Thank you for your attention!

More Related