1 / 23

Using UW MSKTC Systematic Review Tools & Database: Tools for successful project management, data collection, and ext

Using UW MSKTC Systematic Review Tools & Database: Tools for successful project management, data collection, and extraction. Model Systems Knowledge Translation Center University of Washington. MSKTC Steps in Conducting a Systematic Review.

chloris
Télécharger la présentation

Using UW MSKTC Systematic Review Tools & Database: Tools for successful project management, data collection, and ext

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Using UW MSKTC Systematic Review Tools & Database:Tools for successful project management, data collection, and extraction Model Systems Knowledge Translation Center University of Washington

  2. MSKTC Steps in Conducting a Systematic Review

  3. Develop a Good Clinical QuestionDo a quick Scan of the Literature To write a good clinical question, you should ask yourself • Why am I conducting the review? • What do I hope to learn? • Who is this information for? • Consumers, clinicians, researchers, others • Is there enough relevant literature? • Finding enough disability specific research can be a challenge. Conducting a quick scan in the beginning is helpful.

  4. Create a Plan Conduct your literature search Your development plan should include: • Your clinical question • Criteria for the literature search • Key words & Databases • Dates to include (how far back do you go?) • Inclusion and exclusion criteria • A timeline for your project • Possible journals to publish in • Strategies to manage the project

  5. Using PBworks (WIKI) for project management • Platform for long-term project management • Allows for sharing of resources • Organizes documents

  6. Categorize for Inclusion • You have a complete plan and you have a list of articles (from a library search), what is next? • Time to decide which articles meet your inclusion criteria in your plan • How do you decide which articles should be included? • MSKTC uses a “categorization” tool/system to include & exclude articles. • Helps to track & documents the article inclusion process

  7. Sample: Inclusion Categorization System 1 Any article that includes children under age 18, will be flagged in the endnote database with the keyword “child” in the comment field (Custom 6) 2 includes both tetraplegia and paraplegia, and those with complete and incomplete injuries (NOT MS or spinal cord disease)

  8. Sample: Exclusion Criteria

  9. Implementing the Categorization • MSKTC uses Endnote to read article abstracts • Input the inclusion category as (1-5 or “no”) in the research notes field • Excluded Reason (“no”) category are input in the Label field • Could use other Citation System • Excel & Access • Main goal is to track why all potential articles are included and excluded from the review

  10. Sample: Systematic Review Flow Chart Categorization Process Data Extraction

  11. Next Steps: Data Extraction We’ve narrowed down the list of articles by categorizing them so what is next? • Data Extraction • Create Tables of Evidence

  12. MSKTC Systematic Review Database • Designed to improve the efficiency of systematic reviews • Designed for use in disability research and by Model Systems (allows for the collection of data specific to SCI, TBI, and Burns) • Not limited to a specific evidence grading tool • Allows for collection of more detailed data—including measurement data • Web-based so easy to use by anyone with web access & data can be entered simultaneously by many users • Allows for custom reports & Table of Evidence generation • Allows for less costly & more efficient customizations—than normal web-based development

  13. MSKTC Systematic Review Database: Research Design • Practical tool for deciding on research design • Research Design Decision Tree

  14. Research Design Decision Tree

  15. MSKTC Database Tour • Take a look at the database & give brief tour • http://sra.msktc.washington.edu/user.php

  16. Excel Datasheets

  17. Measure Report

  18. Data is in an MySQL Database

  19. View/Query/Manipulate

  20. Future Plans for MSKTC Database • Improved reference/citation importing • Standard reports available in real-time on the site (click a button get a report) • Getting the system set-up for a pilot test on the Women with SCI systematic review • All authors and research assistants will be extracting data together. • Pilot test will help us get input on finalizing the system and reports needed.

  21. For More Information • Elamin, M.B. Choice of data extraction tools for systematic reviews depends on resources and review complexity (http://pubget.com/search?q=latest%3AJournal+of+Clinical+Epidemiology&from=16168344). • Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials: the QUOROM statement checklist http://www.consort-statement.org/mod_product/uploads/QUOROM%20checklist%20and%20flow%20diagram%201999.pdf) • Lewin, S. SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 8: Deciding how much confidence to place in a systematic review (http://www.health-policy-systems.com/content/7/S1/S8) • American Academy of Neurology (AAN) Clinical Practice Guideline Process Manual (http://www.aan.com/globals/axon/assets/3749.pdf)

More Related