1 / 16

SPEAR

SPEAR. PRE-ELECTION POLL 2008. "Justice, Democracy, & Sustainable Development for All". Key Measurements. Voter Turnout / Voter Disposition Government Performance Rating Voter Inclination Voter Motivation Quality of Life Optimism – outcome of elections. National Voter Turn-Out.

chogan
Télécharger la présentation

SPEAR

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SPEAR PRE-ELECTION POLL 2008 "Justice, Democracy, & Sustainable Development for All"

  2. Key Measurements • Voter Turnout / Voter Disposition • Government Performance Rating • Voter Inclination • Voter Motivation • Quality of Life • Optimism – outcome of elections

  3. National Voter Turn-Out

  4. Voter Turn-Out By District

  5. National Voter Turnout: 1984 - 2008

  6. Performance Rating:“ How do you rate the performance of the government during their last term in office?”

  7. Voter Inclination:“ When you go to the polls on February 7th, how are you most likely to vote?”

  8. Voter Inclination - Districts

  9. Voter Motivation:“What is the most important factor influencing the way you vote?”

  10. Voter Motivation -Districts

  11. Perception: “Quality of Life”“Compared to 10 years ago, has your ‘quality of life’ improved?”

  12. Optimism: “Outcome of Elections”“Are you optimistic about the outcome of the elections on February 7th?”

  13. Scenario Forecasting:Scenario #1: No Further Analysis of the “Undecided” & “Confidential” Clusters

  14. Scenario Forecasting:Scenario #2: Further analysis of the responses coded “Confidential” using interpolation , cross tabulations, & data triangulation”

  15. Scenario Forecasting:Scenario #3: Further analysis of responses coded “Confidential” & “Undecided” using similar technique as in scenario #2.

  16. QUIK FACTS ON SAMPLING FRAME • Total Number of Respondents - 417 • Qualifying Criteria - Registered Voter • Proportionate Sample from Six Districts: • Urban - 55.6% • Rural – 44.4% • Male - 40.3% • Female – 59.7 • Age Groupings: • Young Adult – 25.9% • Mature Adult – 67.6% • Middle Age – 20.4% • Elderly - 12.0% Margin of Error (+ or - 5%) or 95% Confidence Level Pre-Test Survey Conducted

More Related