560 likes | 685 Vues
Forney ISD Academic Excellence Indicator System 2009-2010. Inspiring StudentsThrough Innovative Education. 1984-85 – Essential Elements adopted as State curriculum (1981 HB 246). 1985-86 – TEAMS and Annual Performance Report (1984 HB 72). 1990-91 – TAAS and AEIS (1989 SB 417).
E N D
Forney ISD Academic Excellence Indicator System 2009-2010 Inspiring StudentsThroughInnovative Education
1984-85 – Essential Elements adopted as State curriculum (1981 HB 246) 1985-86 – TEAMS and Annual Performance Report (1984 HB 72) 1990-91 – TAAS and AEIS (1989 SB 417) 1998-99 – TEKS implemented as State curriculum in schools (1991 HB 2885) 2000-01 – SDAA (1997 HB 1800) Key Dates Accountability/Assessment 2002-03 – TAKS (1999 SB 103) 2002-03 – Student Success Initiative begins for 3rd graders (1999 SB 4) 1980-81 – TABS (1979 SB 350) 2002-03 – AYP (2002 NCLB) 2004-05 – PBM (2003 H.B. 3459) 2005-06 – TAKS-Inclusive (now TAKS-Accommodated) and TAKS-LAT 2007-08 – SPP (2004 IDEA) 2007-08 – TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alternate Coming Attractions: EOC, College Readiness, ELL Progress
AEIS: Accountability Standards • * TAKS-Accommodated • Science (Grades 5, 8, 10, 11) ELA (Grade 11) • Social Studies (Grades 8, 10, 11) Math (Grade 11)
AEISAccountability Standards • Annual Dropout Rate (Grades 7-8) • Standards by Accountability Year (school year of dropout in parentheses)
AEIS Accountability Standards • Completion Rate (HS) • Grades 9-12 (2004-05 Freshman Class) • Final Decision: Standards by Accountability Year (freshman year of cohort in parentheses)
What is AEIS? • Comprehensive reporting system defined by statute • Published annually since 1990-91 • Gives parents and community a snapshot of • District/Campus Performance (Section I of AEIS Report) • District/Campus Profile (Section II of AEIS Report) • Contains all data used to determine District/Campus accountability ratings • Uses data collected through: • State data reporting system (PEIMS) • Student assessment system
2009-10 Academic Excellence indicator System Reported in Three Sections • Section I: District/Campus Performance • Data for all indicators used to determine accountability ratings • Spring 2010 TAKS Performance • Completion Rate I for class of 2009 • 2008-09 Annual Dropout Rate for grades 7 and 8 • Disaggregated Met Standard data by grade level/Subject tested
2009-10 Academic Excellence indicator System Reported in Three Sections • Section I: District/Campus Performance • TAKS Performance – Spring 2010 • Met Standard by grade, subject and student group • Comparison to 2009 performance • Comparison to State and Region Performance • TAKS met Standard with TPM • TAKS Commended Performance • TAKS M 2010 • TAKS ALT 2010 • TAKS M & ALT (2011 Preview) Standard and Commended • 2010 TAKS Participants • TAKS Exit Level Cumulative Pass Rate • Progress of Prior Year TAKS Failers • Student Success Initiative
2009-10 Academic Excellence indicator System Reported in Three Sections • Section I: District/Campus Performance • English Language Learner Progress Indicator • Attendance Rate • Annual Dropout Rate • Completion Rate • College Readiness Indicators • Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment Completion • RHSP/DAP Graduates • AP/IB Results • Higher Education Readiness Component • SAT/ACT Results • College-Ready Graduates
2009-10 Academic Excellence indicator System Reported in Three Sections • Section II: District/Campus Profile • Demographic data about students and staff • Financial information • Program information
2009-10 Academic Excellence indicator System Reported in Three Sections • Section III: Bilingual Education / English as a Second Language Report • Bilingual Education/English as a Second Language Report • Selected AEIS indicators disaggregated by bilingual and ESL instructional models • Nine columns for three required indicators: • Accountability base indicator, • SSI indicators, and • Progress of Prior Year Failures
AEIS Key Issues • Dropout Rate / Completion Rate • Dropout rate or completion rate CAN be the cause of a lowered district/campus rating • Texas Projection Measure (TPM) • TPM estimates whether a student is likely to pass TAKS assessments at a future grade. • For State Accountability, all students who met proficiency OR were predicted to meet proficiency at a future grade using TPM will be counted as proficient. • Vertical Scale • Reported in 2009; Full use in 2009-10 for TAKS Math and Reading, grades 3-8 • Allows comparison of student test scores across grade levels in a subject • Cut scores vary by grade and subject
Forney ISD Academic Excellence Indicator System 2009-2010 Inspiring Students through Innovative Education
2009-10 Academic Excellence indicator System Cover Page • District Name: FORNEY ISD • District # 129902 • 2010 Accountability Rating: Exemplary • District PBM Special Education Monitoring Results Status • Not listed for FISD – no monitoring required • District/Campus 2008 Gold Performance Acknowledgments: • Attendance (2008-09) • College- Ready Graduates (Class of 2009) • Texas Success Initiative (TSI) ELA • Commended on Reading/ELA • Commended on Writing • Commended on Social Studies
2009-2010 fISD Campus Accountability Ratings • ELEMENTARY: • Blackburn Elementary – Recognized • Claybon Elementary – Exemplary • Criswell Elementary – Exemplary • Crosby Elementary – Exemplary • Henderson Elementary – Exemplary • Johnson Elementary – Exemplary • Lewis Elementary – Exemplary • Rhea Elementary – Exemplary • Smith Elementary - Recognized • Forney ISD: Exemplary
2009-2010 fISD Campus Accountability Ratings • Forney ISD: Exemplary • SECONDARY • Brown Middle School – Recognized • Warren Middle School – Exemplary • Forney High School – Recognized • North Forney High School – Recognized
FORNEY ISD READING/ELA
TAKS MET 2010 STANDARDS (Sum of All Grades Tested) READING/ELA
TAKS MET 2010 STANDARDS WITH TPM (Sum of All Grades Tested) READING/ELA
COMMENDED PERFORMANCE (Sum of All Grades Tested) READING/ELA
FISD 2010 TAKS MET STANDARDS SUB POPS (Sum of All Grades Tested) READING/ELA
2010 Fisd TAKS Performance By Grade Level READING/ELA *Grades 5 & 8 First Administration Only
FORNEY ISD MATHEMATICS
TAKS MET 2010 STANDARDS (Sum of All Grades Tested) MATHEMATICS
TAKS MET 2010 STANDARDS WITH TPM (Sum of All Grades Tested) MATHEMATIC
COMMENDED PERFORMANCE (Sum of All Grades Tested) MATHEMATICS
FISD 2010 TAKS MET STANDARDS SUB POPS (Sum of All Grades Tested) MATHEMATICS
2010 Fisd TAKS Performance By Grade Level MATHEMATICS *Grades 5 & 8 First Administration Only
FORNEY ISD Science
TAKS MET 2010 STANDARDS (Sum of All Grades Tested) SCIENCE
TAKS MET 2010 STANDARDS WITH TPM (Sum of All Grades Tested) SCIENCE
COMMENDED PERFORMANCE (Sum of All Grades Tested) SCIENCE
FISD 2010 TAKS MET STANDARDS SUB POPS (Sum of All Grades Tested) SCIENCE
FORNEY ISD Social studies
TAKS MET 2010 STANDARDS (Sum of All Grades Tested) SOCIAL STUDIES
TAKS MET 2010 STANDARDS WITH TPM (Sum of All Grades Tested) SOCIAL STUDIES
COMMENDED PERFORMANCE (Sum of All Grades Tested) SOCIAL STUDIES
FISD 2010 TAKS MET STANDARDS SUB POPS (Sum of All Grades Tested) SOCIAL STUDIES
2010 FISD TAKS Performance By Grade Level SOCIAL STUDIES
Completion Rate I Completion Rate I (HS) • Grades 9-12 • 4-year cohort measure • Formula: # Graduates + Continuers # Graduates + Continuers + GED + Dropouts
ADVANCE PLACEMENT(AP) SCORES >= CRITERION
SAT/ACT RESULTS TESTED